Abstract
“College students try to hack a gene – and set a science fair abuzz” (Swetlitz 2016); “Amateurs Are New Fear in Creating Mutant Virus”(Zimmer 2015); “DIY Gene Editing: Someone Is Going to Get Hurt” (Baumgaertner 2018); and “In Attics and Closets, Biohackers Discover Their Inner Frankenstein (Whalen 2009)”—these are the headlines the public reads in major publications like the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and others about the increasing accessibility to biotechnologies. Read aloud; they sound like the opening trailers for horror movies. Have there been missteps? Stunts? Individuals that spark controversy? Of course. But pandemics? Environmental disasters? Of course not. What has occurred though, and the story that is rarely told, are the tens of thousands of students and everyday citizens that have been introduced to biology, biotechnology, and science more broadly, who might not otherwise have had the opportunity to explore it. As with any broad reaching loosely affiliated community, there will always be those pushing the boundaries and trying to steal the spotlight with hyperbole and stunts. And with the help of some in the press, have misbranded and misrepresented the entire community of citizens interested in biology. Unfortunately these stories overshadow the educational opportunities this community provides and dismisses the safety, security, ethical, and responsible innovation practices and programs they have established.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Baumgaertner, E. (2018). As D.I.Y. gene editing gains popularity, ‘someone is going to get hurt.’ New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/14/science/biohackers-gene-editing-virus.html
Biosummit, Global Community. (2018). Global Community Biosummit. https://www.biosummit.org/
Bloomberg. (2018, September). This biohacker makes mutant frogs — And you can buy them on the internet. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2018/09/12/genetic-engineering-buy-frogs/
Carlson, R. (2005, May). Splice it yourself. Wired.
de Beer, J., & Jain, V. (2018). Inclusive innovation in biohacker spaces: The role of systems and networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(2).
Demuijnck, G., & Fasterling, B. (2016). The social license to operate. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2976-7.
DIYbio. (2013). No title. Ask a biosafety professional. http://ask.diybio.org/
FDA. (2017). Information about self-administration of gene therapy. https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/CellularGeneTherapyProducts/ucm586343.htm
Gallois, C., Ashworth, P., Leach, J., & Moffat, K. (2017). The language of science and social licence to operate. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16663254.
Grushkin, D., Kuiken, T., & Millet, P. (2013). Seven Myths & Realities about do-it-yourself biology. Washington, D.C.
IGEM. (2018). IGEM – previous competitions. http://igem.org/Previous_Competitions
iGEM. (2019). Human Practices Program. https://2019.igem.org/Human_Practices
iGEM Foundation. (2018a). 2018 exemplary projects in safety. http://2018.igem.org/Safety/Exemplary_Projects
iGEM Foundation. (2018b). IGEM animal use form. http://2018.igem.org/Safety/Animal_Use_Check_In
iGEM Foundation. (2018c). IGEM safety check in. http://2018.igem.org/Safety/Check_In
iGEM Foundation. (2018d). IGEM safety form. http://2018.igem.org/Safety/Final_Safety_Form
iGEM Foundation. (2018e). IGEM safety policies. http://2018.igem.org/Safety/Policies
iGEM Foundation. (2018f). IGEM safety rules. http://2018.igem.org/Safety/Rules
iGEM Foundation. (2018g). IGEM White List. http://2018.igem.org/Safety/White_List
IGEM, International Genetically Engineered Machines Competition. (2017). Registry of Standard Biological Parts.
International Genetically Engineered Machines Competition. (2018). IGEM human practices. http://igem.org/Human_Practices
Kuiken, T. (2016). Governance: Learn from DIY biologists. Nature, 531(7593), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/531167a.
Kuiken, T., Pauwels, E., & Denton, S. W. (2018). The rise of the new bio-citizen workshop. Washington, D.C. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/the-rise-the-new-bio-citizen-workshop
Lunshof, J. E., & Birnbaum, A. (2017). Adaptive risk management of gene drive experiments. Applied Biosafety, 22(3), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676017721488.
Millett, P., Binz, T., Evans, S. W., Kuiken, T., Oye, K., Palmer, M. J., van der Vlugt, C., Yambao, K., & Yu, S. (2019). Developing a comprehensive, adaptive, and international biosafety and biosecurity program for advanced biotechnology: The IGEM experience. Applied Biosafety, 153567601983807, 64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019838075.
Minnesota, Team. (2016). Shifting gene drives into reverse: Now mosquitoes are the yeast of our worries. IGEM Foundation. http://2016.igem.org/Team:Minnesota
Odin. (2018). The Odin. http://www.the-odin.com/about-us/
Open Philanthropy Project. (2019). Open philanthropy project. https://www.openphilanthropy.org/
Pauwels, E., & Denton, S. W. (2018). The rise of the new bio-citizen. Washington, D.C. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/the-rise-the-new-bio-citizen
PRIMR. (2019). Public responsibility in medicine and research. https://www.primr.org/about/
Sherman, R. E., Anderson, S. A., Pan, G. J. D., Gray, G. W., Gross, T., Hunter, N. L., LaVange, L., et al. (2016). Real-world evidence — What is it and what can it tell us? New England Journal of Medicine, 375(23), 2293–2297. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.
Smalley, E. (2018). FDA warns public of dangers of DIY gene therapy. Nature Biotechnology, 36(2), 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0218-119.
Swetlitz, I. (2016, December). College students try to hack a gene drive — And set a science fair abuzz. STAT News. https://www.statnews.com/2016/12/14/gene-drive-students-igem/
The Australia Group. (2019). List of human and animal pathogens and toxins for EXPORT control. https://australiagroup.net/en/human_animal_pathogens.html
U.S. FDA. (2017). Use of real world evidence to support decision-making for medical devices. Use of real world evidence to support decision-making for medical devices.
U.S. FDA. (2018). 21st century cures act. https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/lawsenforcedbyfda/significantamendmentstothefdcact/21stcenturycuresact/default.htm
Whalen, J. (2009). In attics and closets, ‘biohackers’ discover their inner Frankenstein. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124207326903607931
Zimmer, C. (2015, March 5). Amateurs are new fear in creating mutant virus. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/06/health/amateur-biologists-are-new-fear-in-making-a-mutant-flu-virus.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuiken, T. (2020). Biology Without Borders: Need for Collective Governance?. In: Trump, B., Cummings, C., Kuzma, J., Linkov, I. (eds) Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance. Risk, Systems and Decisions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27264-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27264-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27263-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27264-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)