Abstract
To minimize the number of iterations and correction returns while designing a system, sharing crucial parameters and data between different actors is needed. Since mechatronic systems are considered complex because of their multi-disciplines, their design requires collaborative work to ensure the sharing of parameters between contributors from different domains. This paper proposes a new methodology based on the collaborative design to choose the architecture of a mechatronic system. This methodology is structured around three main phases: the pre-collaboration phase, the collaboration phase and the post-collaboration phase. The proposed methodology has been validated by applying it on a mechatronic system called Electronic Throttle Body (ETB). In order to share the different established activities and capitalize knowledge, KARREN (Knowledge Acquisition and reuse for Robust Engineering) a collaborative tool from DPS (Digital Product Simulation) a French company, is used in this project to help us to choose the appropriate architecture of the Electronic Throttle Body.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abid H, Pernelle P, Noterman D, Campagne JP, Ben Amar C (2015) SysML approach for the integration of mechatronics system within PLM systems. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(9):972–987
Alexopoulos K, Makris S, Xanthakis V, Chryssolouris G (2011) A web-services oriented workflow management system for integrated digital production engineering. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 4(3):290–295
Azzouzi EM, Iuliano M, Hammadi M, Plateaux R, Marchand F (2016) Process integration and design optimization technologies for modelling improvement. In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on systems engineering (ISSE). IEEE, pp 1–5
Badin J (2011) Ingénierie hautement productive et collaborative à base de connaissances métier: vers une méthodologie et un méta-modèle de gestion des connaissances en configurations (Doctoral dissertation, Belfort-Montbéliard)
Behbahani S, de Silva CW (2014) Niching genetic scheme with bond graphs for topology and parameter optimization of a mechatronic system. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 19(1):269–277 (In Press). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp
Chen K, Bankston J, Panchal JH, Schaefer D (2009) A framework for integrated design of mechatronic systems. In: Collaborative design and planning for digital manufacturing. Springer, London, pp 37–70
Ferretti G, Magnani G, Rocco P (2004) Virtual prototyping of mechatronic systems. Ann Rev Control 28(2):193–206
Hammadi M, Choley JY, Penas O, Riviere A, Louati J, Haddar M (2012) A new multi-criteria indicator for mechatronic system performance evaluation in preliminary design level. In: 2012 9th France-Japan & 7th Europe-Asia congress on mechatronics (MECATRONICS), and 2012 13th international workshop on research and education in mechatronics (REM). IEEE, pp 409–416
Lara-Molina FA, Dumur D, Koroishi EH (2016) Structure-control optimal design of 6-DOF fully parallel robot. In: Robotics. Springer, Cham, pp 247–266
Li Q, Zhang WJ, Chen L (2001) Design for control-a concurrent engineering approach for mechatronic systems design. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 6(2):161–169
Masoudi A, You H, Suh SH (2012) A guidance system for selecting an appropriate eco-design checklist in the early stages of product development. In: 3rd International conference on green and sustainable innovation, May 2012
Mcharek M, Azib T, Hammadi M, Choley JY, Larouci C (2018) Knowledge sharing for mechatronic systems design and optimization. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11):1365–1370
Mcharek M, Hammadi M, Choley JY, Azib T, Larouci C (2016) Modeling and multi-objective optimization of an Electronic Throttle in open-loop. In: 17th international conference on research and education in mechatronics (REM) 2016 11th France-Japan & 9th Europe-Asia congress on mechatronics (MECATRONICS). IEEE, pp 331–335
Model Center (2012) Phoenix Integration. www.phoenix-int.com
Mohebbi A, Achiche S, Baron L (2014) Mechatronic multicriteria profile (MMP) for conceptual design of a robotic visual servoing system. In: 12th Biennial conference on engineering systems design and analysis, ASME 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p V003T15A015
Moulianitis VC, Aspragathos NA, Dentsoras AJ (2004) A model for concept evaluation in design—an application to mechatronics design of robot grippers. Mechatronics 14(6):599–622
Moulianitis VC, Zachiotis GA, Aspragathos NA (2018) A new index based on mechatronics abilities for the conceptual design evaluation. Mechatronics 49:67–76
Samarakoon BL, Gamage LB, de Silva CW (2016) Design evolution of engineering systems using bond graphs and genetic programming. Mechatronics 33:71–83
Seo K, Fan Z, Hu J, Goodman ED, Rosenberg RC (2003) Toward a unified and automated design methodology for multi-domain dynamic systems using bond graphs and genetic programming. Mechatronics 13(8–9):851–885
Villarreal-Cervantes MG, Cruz-Villar CA, Alvarez-Gallegos J (2009) Structure-control mechatronic design of the planar 5r 2dof parallel robot. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on mechatronics, ICM 2009. IEEE, pp 1–6
Zhang WJ, Li Q, Guo LS (1999) Integrated design of mechanical structure and control algorithm for a programmable four-bar linkage. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 4(4):354–362
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their acknowledgments to the mechanical laboratory of Sousse (Tunisia) and QUARTZ laboratory in SUPMECA-Paris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fradi, M., Gaha, R., Mlika, A., Mhenni, F., Choley, J.Y. (2020). Design of an Electronic Throttle Body Based on a New Knowledge Sharing Engineering Methodology. In: Aifaoui, N., et al. Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems - IV. CMSM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27146-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27146-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27145-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27146-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)