Abstract
In 2010, University College Cork (UCC) was the first institution in the world to be awarded a “Green Flag” from the Foundation for Environmental Education. Since 2011, UCC has been ranked highly in the UI Green Metric World University Rankings and, in 2018, the university participated in the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS). STARS—a programme of the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE)—is a transparent, self-reporting framework for colleges and universities to comprehensively measure their sustainability performance. In 2018, UCC became the first university outside of the US and Canada to achieve a STARS Gold Rating. This paper documents the experience of UCC in undertaking the STARS assessment for the first time and explores how the process is helping to shape the sustainability agenda at UCC. The STARS submission process involves a collaborative review stage, and the use of this collaboration to shape further development of the STARS programme will be also be examined. Transparent reporting tools, such as STARS, present opportunities for further engagement with campus stakeholders. Recommendations for campuses embarking on the programme, and for the assessment of sustainability in higher education will be presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (2018) New AASHE & ACTS partnership brings STARS to Australasia. https://www.aashe.org/news/aashe-acts-partnership/. Last accessed 28 Mar 2019
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (2019a) About STARS. https://stars.aashe.org/about-stars/. Last accessed 28 Mar 2019
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (2019b) STARS Technical Manual. https://stars.aashe.org/resources-support/technical-manual/. Last accessed 28 Mar 2019
Ballantyne R, Packer J (2009) Introducing a fifth pedagogy: experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Env Ed Res 15(2):243–262
Barr S (2007) Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors, a U.K. case study of household waste management. Environ Behav 39(4):435–473
Byrne E (2017) Paradigmatic transformation across the disciplines; snapshots of an emerging complexity informed approach to progress, evolution and sustainability. In: Byrne E, Mullally G, Sage C (eds) Transdisciplinary perspectives on transitions to sustainability. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 65–82
Byrne E, Mullally G, Sage C (2017) Transdisciplinary perspectives on transitions to sustainability. Routledge, Abingdon
Chaplin G, Wyton P (2014) Student engagement with sustainability: understanding the value–action gap. Int J Sust Higher Ed 15(4):404–417
Department of Communications, Energy Efficiency and Natural Resources (2009) Maximising Ireland’s energy efficiency the national energy efficiency action plan 2009–2020. Department of Communications, Energy Efficiency and Natural Resources, Dublin
Environmental Association of Universities and Colleges (2017) Mapping sustainability assessment and reporting in the UK Tertiary education. https://www.eauc.org.uk/eauc_launches_new_research_on_sustainability_re. Last accessed 28 Mar 2019
Faghihi V, Hessami AR, Ford DN (2015) Sustainable campus improvement program design using energy efficiency and conservation. J Clean Prod 107:400–409
Findler F, Schönherr R, Lozano R, Stacherl R (2018) Assessing the impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development—an analysis of tools and indicators. Sust 11:59–78
Hands V, Anderson R (2016) Benchmarking sustainability research: a methodology for reviewing sustainable development research in universities. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Sustainable development research at universities in the United Kingdom. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 27–43
Higher Education Associations Sustainability Consortium (2006) Call for a system for assessing & comparing progress in campus sustainability. https://stars.aashe.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/HEASC-call.pdf. Last accessed 28 Mar 2019
König A (2015) Changing requisites to universities in the 21st century: organizing for transformative sustainability science for systemic change. Curr Opin Env Sust 16:105–111
Lauder A, Sari RF, Suwartha N, Tjahjono G (2015) Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: Green Metric. J Clean Prod 108:852–863
Maiorano J, Savan B (2015) Barriers to energy efficiency and the uptake of green revolving funds in Canadian universities. Int J Sust Higher Ed 16(2):200–216
Mero T (2011) Town and gown unite. Sustain J Record 4(4):169–173
Molderez I, Fonseca L (2018) The efficacy of real-world experiences and service learning for fostering competences for sustainable development in higher education. J Clean Prod 172:4397–4410
O’Mahony C, Higgs B, Alexander D, Kilcommins S, Ryan AC, Blackshields D, McCarthy M, O’Sullivan K, Cronin JGR (2015) A review of scholarly work and educator understanding of Pedagogies of transition: implications for impact. National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning, Dublin
O’Sullivan S, O’Tuama S, Kenny L (2018) Universities as key responders to education inequality. Global Discourse 7(4):527–538
Parag Y, Janda KB (2014) More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out”. Energy Res Soc Sci 3:102–112
Parnell R (2016) Grassroots participation integrated with strong administration commitment is essential to address challenges of sustainability leadership: tools for successfully meeting in the middle. J Env Stud Sci 6(2):399–404
Reidy D, Kirrane M, Curley B, Brosnan D, Koch S, Bolger P, Dunphy N, McCarthy M, Poland M, Ryan-Fogarty Y, O’Halloran J (2015) A journey in sustainable development in an urban campus. In: Leal Filho W, Brandli L, Kuznetsova O, Paço AMF (eds) Integrative approaches to sustainable development at university level. World Sustainability Series. Springer International Publishing, pp. 599
Ryan-Fogarty Y, O’Regan B, Moles R (2016) Greening healthcare: systematic implementation of environmental programmes in a university teaching hospital. J Clean Prod 126:248–259
Ryan-Fogarty Y, Carlin C, Reidy DT, Kirrane MJ (submitted) Intervarsity BioBlitz as a sustainability reporting tool for the higher education sector: a case study of Irish Universities
Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Iss 56(3):407–424
UNESCO (2017) Cork call to action for learning cities. https://uil.unesco.org/lifelong-learning/learning-cities/cork-call-action-learning-cities. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
University College Cork (2016) UCC sustainability strategy. https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/support/greencampus/UCCSustainabilityStrategy_interactive.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
University College Cork (2017) UCC civic engagement plan: together With and for the community. https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/centralmedia/UCC_Civic_Engage_2017a.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2019
University College Cork (2018a) UCC ranks in world’s top 10 ‘Green’ universities. Available at: https://www.ucc.ie/en/news/ucc-ranks-in-worlds-top-10-green-universities.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2018
University College Cork (2018b) The connected university: academic strategy (2018–2022). https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/support/regsa/dpr/academicstrategy/AcademicStrategy2018-2022.pdf. Last accessed 28 Mar 2019
Wals AEJ, Corcoran PB (2012) Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change. Wageningen Academic Publishers
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Annex 1
Annex 1
-
STARS credits (version 2.1)
Academics (AC) | Curriculum 40 points available | AC 1: Academic courses AC 2: Learning outcomes AC 3: Undergraduate program AC 4: Graduate program AC 5: Immersive experience AC 6: Sustainability literacy assessment AC 7: Incentives for developing courses AC 8: Campus as a living laboratory |
Research 18 points available | AC 9: Research and scholarship AC 10: Support for sustainability research AC 11: Open access to research | |
Engagement (EN) | Campus engagement 21 points available | EN 1: Student educators program EN 2: Student orientation EN 3: Student life EN 4: Outreach materials and publications EN 5: Outreach campaign EN 6: Assessing sustainability culture EN 7: Employee educators program EN 8: Employee orientation EN 9: Staff professional development |
Public engagement 20 points available | EN 10: Community partnerships EN 11: Inter-campus collaboration EN 12: Continuing education EN 13: Community service EN 14: Participation in public policy EN 15: Trademark licensing | |
Operations (OP) | Air and climate 11 points available | OP 1: Greenhouse gas emissions OP 2: Outdoor air quality |
Buildings 8 points available | OP 3: Building operations and maintenance OP 4: Building design and construction | |
Energy 10 points available | OP 5: Building energy consumption OP 6: Clean and renewable energy | |
Food and dining 8 points available | OP 7: Food and beverage purchasing OP 8: Sustainable dining | |
Grounds 4 points available | OP 9: Landscape management OP 10: Biodiversity | |
Purchasing 6 points available | OP 11: Sustainable procurement OP 12: Electronics purchasing OP 13: Cleaning and janitorial purchasing OP 14: Office paper purchasing | |
Transportation 7 points available | OP 15: Campus fleet OP 16: Student commute modal split OP 17: Employee commute modal split OP 18: Support for sustainable transportation | |
Waste 10 points available | OP 19: Waste minimization and diversion OP 20: Construction and demolition waste diversion OP 21: Hazardous waste management | |
Water 8 points available | OP 22: Water use OP 23: Rainwater management | |
Planning and administration (PA) | Coordination and planning 8 points available | PA 1: Sustainability coordination PA 2: Sustainability planning PA 3: Participatory governance |
Diversity and affordability 10 points available | PA 4: Diversity and equity coordination PA 5: Assessing diversity and equity PA 6: Support for underrepresented groups PA 7: Affordability and access | |
Investment and finance 7 points available | PA 8: Committee on investor responsibility PA 9: Sustainable investment PA 10: Investment disclosure | |
Wellbeing and work 7 points available | PA 11: Employee compensation PA 12: Assessing employee satisfaction PA 13: Wellness program PA 14: Workplace health and safety | |
Innovation and leadership | 4 bonus points available | A catalog of exemplary practice and open-ended innovation credits available for selection |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirrane, M.J., Pelton, C., Mehigan, P., Poland, M., Mullally, G., O’Halloran, J. (2020). “Reaching for the STARS”: A Collaborative Approach to Transparent Sustainability Reporting in Higher Education, the Experience of a European University in Achieving STARS Gold. In: Leal Filho, W., Borges de Brito, P., Frankenberger, F. (eds) International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26758-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26759-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)