Skip to main content

Using Prospect Theory to Determine Investor Risk Aversion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Impact of Digital Transformation and FinTech on the Finance Professional

Abstract

The prospect theory model developed by Daniel Kahnemann and Amos Tversky in 1979 is now widely recognized as providing more empirically valid explanations of decision-making under uncertainty than the classical von Neumann-Morgenstern paradigm of expected utility maximization. However, despite compelling potential use cases, industry applications of prospect theory remain scarce. Following an outline of the shortcomings of classical expected utility theory and some key tenets of prospect theory, we discuss how prospect theory can be used in practice to obtain meaningful estimates of investor risk preferences. We then conclude with a case study of the digital investment management firm LIQID and its use of prospect theory as a decision support tool for its clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Allais, M. (1953). Le Comportement de L’Homme Rationnel Devant Le Risque: Critique Des Postulats et Axiomes de L’École Americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, K. K., De Giorgi, E. G., & Hens, T. (2018). Behavioural finance for private banking: From the art of advice to the science of advice (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, R. (2017). Normative theories of rational choice: Expected utility. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.). Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick P. Brooks, J. (1995). No silver bullet—Essence and accident in software engineering. In J. Frederick P. Brooks (Ed.), The mythical man-month, anniversary edition with 4 new chapters (pp. 1069–1076). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, W. S. (1990). The puzzle of the self-torturer. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantin Lisson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lisson, C. (2019). Using Prospect Theory to Determine Investor Risk Aversion. In: Liermann, V., Stegmann, C. (eds) The Impact of Digital Transformation and FinTech on the Finance Professional. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23719-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23719-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23718-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23719-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics