Skip to main content

A Quantum Model of Non-illusory Free Will

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quanta and Mind

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 414))

Abstract

Contemporary science and philosophy are dominated by a mechanistic materialist metaphysic that treats consciousness as a derivative aspect of the brain’s physical state, with no independent causal efficacy ascribed to consciousness. Studies suggest there may be negative social consequences to widespread popular belief that our thoughts are passive spectators to our behavior. Dissenting from the commonly held view, the psychologist William James argued that consciousness must serve some evolutionary purpose, and therefore must be efficacious. But how might something as insubstantial as a thought cause something to happen in the physical world? According to mechanistic materialism, it cannot. However, there is an alternative to mechanistic materialism. The physicist Stapp argues that a realistic interpretation of quantum theory can form the basis for a scientifically well-founded theory of efficacious conscious choice. The resulting theory of agency fills complementary explanatory gaps in physics and psychology, allowing consciousness to become efficacious in a manner entirely consistent with empirically validated physical theory. The profound implications of a scientifically well-founded theory of non-illusory free will argue for working out a detailed model of its operation in human brains and devising empirical tests of the model’s predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altenmüller, T. P., & Schenzle, A. (1993, July). Dynamics by measurement: Aharonov’s inverse quantum Zeno effect. Physical Review. A, Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 48(1), 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J., A. (2014, January). How unconscious thought and perception affect our every waking moment. Scientific American, 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Brewer, L. E. (2012). Believing versus disbelieving in free will: Correlates and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10), 736–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, S. (2016, June). There’s no such thing as free will. The Atlantic [Internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-will/480750/

  • Dennett, D. C. (1996, January 1). Facing backwards on the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, F., & McCormick, D. A. (2010, July 15). Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron, 67(1), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2012). Free will (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (2001). Psychology: The briefer course. Later edition (p. 368). Mineola: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskey, K. B. (2018a). Acting in the world: A physical model of free choice. Journal of Cognitive Science, 19(2), 125–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laskey, K. B. (2018b, October 6). A theory of physically embodied and causally effective agency. Information, 9(10), 249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavazza, A. (2016, June 1). Free will and neuroscience: From explaining freedom away to new ways of operationalizing and measuring it. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. [Internet. Cited 2018 August 26]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887467/.

  • Lavazza, A., & De Caro, M. (2010, April 1). Not so fast. On some bold neuroscientific claims concerning human agency. Neuroethics, 3(1), 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavazza, A., & Inglese, S. (2015, April 17). Operationalizing and measuring (a kind of) free will (and responsibility). Towards a new framework for psychology, ethics, and law. Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 6(1), 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(4), 529–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B., Wright, E. W. J., Feinstein, B., & Pearl, D. K. (1979). Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience. Brain, 102, 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983, September). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 106(Pt 3), 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. D., Rigoni, D., & Vohs, K. D. (2017, July 11). Free will beliefs predict attitudes toward unethical behavior and criminal punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7325–7330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, J. (2000). Quantum evolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, J. (2013). The CEMI field theory closing the loop. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(1–2), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. R. (2009). Effective intentions: The power of conscious will (p. 208). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, B., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1977, April 1). The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18, 756–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2010, June 1). From uncaused will to conscious choice: The need to study, not speculate about people’s folk concept of free will. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(2), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, A. E., Brady, G. L., & Malle, B. F. (2017, March 1). This isn’t the free will worth looking for: General free will beliefs do not influence moral judgments, agent-specific choice ascriptions do. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Noûs, 41(4), 663–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, Y. S., Chakram, S., & Vengalattore, M. (2015, October 2). Measurement-induced localization of an ultracold lattice gas. Physical Review Letters, 115(14), 140402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect (1st ed., p. 432). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pockett, S. (2002). On subjective back-referral and how long it takes to become conscious of a stimulus: A reinterpretation of Libet’s data. Consciousness and Cognition, 11(2), 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, B., & Kuttner, F. (2011). Quantum enigma: Physics encounters consciousness (2nd ed., p. 304). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. M., Stapp, H. P., & Beauregard, M. (2005). Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: A new model with respect to mind/brain interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360(1458), 1309–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilansky, S. (2000). Free will and illusion (1st ed., p. 344). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, H. P. (2011). Mindful universe: Quantum mechanics and the participating observer (2nd ed., p. 230). Berlin/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, H. P. (2017). Quantum theory and free will: How mental intentions translate into bodily actions (1st ed., p. 142). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F., & Mele, A. R. (2011). Free will in everyday life: Autobiographical accounts of free and unfree actions. Philosophical Psychology, 24(3), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. M. (2003). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H. (2009). Neurophilosophy of free will: From libertarian illusions to a concept of natural autonomy (p. 420). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgement is due to Henry Stapp for extensive discussions, explanations, and feedback as the ideas expressed in this paper evolved. Appreciation is extended to participants in the April 2018 International Conference on Quanta and the Mind for stimulating discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Blackmond Laskey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laskey, K.B. (2019). A Quantum Model of Non-illusory Free Will. In: de Barros, J.A., Montemayor, C. (eds) Quanta and Mind. Synthese Library, vol 414. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21908-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics