Abstract
Contemporary science and philosophy are dominated by a mechanistic materialist metaphysic that treats consciousness as a derivative aspect of the brain’s physical state, with no independent causal efficacy ascribed to consciousness. Studies suggest there may be negative social consequences to widespread popular belief that our thoughts are passive spectators to our behavior. Dissenting from the commonly held view, the psychologist William James argued that consciousness must serve some evolutionary purpose, and therefore must be efficacious. But how might something as insubstantial as a thought cause something to happen in the physical world? According to mechanistic materialism, it cannot. However, there is an alternative to mechanistic materialism. The physicist Stapp argues that a realistic interpretation of quantum theory can form the basis for a scientifically well-founded theory of efficacious conscious choice. The resulting theory of agency fills complementary explanatory gaps in physics and psychology, allowing consciousness to become efficacious in a manner entirely consistent with empirically validated physical theory. The profound implications of a scientifically well-founded theory of non-illusory free will argue for working out a detailed model of its operation in human brains and devising empirical tests of the model’s predictions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altenmüller, T. P., & Schenzle, A. (1993, July). Dynamics by measurement: Aharonov’s inverse quantum Zeno effect. Physical Review. A, Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 48(1), 70–79.
Bargh, J., A. (2014, January). How unconscious thought and perception affect our every waking moment. Scientific American, 32–39.
Baumeister, R. F., & Brewer, L. E. (2012). Believing versus disbelieving in free will: Correlates and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10), 736–745.
Cave, S. (2016, June). There’s no such thing as free will. The Atlantic [Internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-will/480750/
Dennett, D. C. (1996, January 1). Facing backwards on the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), 4–6.
Fröhlich, F., & McCormick, D. A. (2010, July 15). Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron, 67(1), 129–143.
Harris, S. (2012). Free will (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover.
James, W. (2001). Psychology: The briefer course. Later edition (p. 368). Mineola: Dover Publications.
Laskey, K. B. (2018a). Acting in the world: A physical model of free choice. Journal of Cognitive Science, 19(2), 125–163.
Laskey, K. B. (2018b, October 6). A theory of physically embodied and causally effective agency. Information, 9(10), 249.
Lavazza, A. (2016, June 1). Free will and neuroscience: From explaining freedom away to new ways of operationalizing and measuring it. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. [Internet. Cited 2018 August 26]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887467/.
Lavazza, A., & De Caro, M. (2010, April 1). Not so fast. On some bold neuroscientific claims concerning human agency. Neuroethics, 3(1), 23–41.
Lavazza, A., & Inglese, S. (2015, April 17). Operationalizing and measuring (a kind of) free will (and responsibility). Towards a new framework for psychology, ethics, and law. Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 6(1), 37–55.
Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(4), 529–566.
Libet, B., Wright, E. W. J., Feinstein, B., & Pearl, D. K. (1979). Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience. Brain, 102, 193–224.
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983, September). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 106(Pt 3), 623–642.
Martin, N. D., Rigoni, D., & Vohs, K. D. (2017, July 11). Free will beliefs predict attitudes toward unethical behavior and criminal punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7325–7330.
McFadden, J. (2000). Quantum evolution. New York: Norton.
McFadden, J. (2013). The CEMI field theory closing the loop. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(1–2), 1–2.
Mele, A. R. (2009). Effective intentions: The power of conscious will (p. 208). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Misra, B., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1977, April 1). The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18, 756–763.
Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2010, June 1). From uncaused will to conscious choice: The need to study, not speculate about people’s folk concept of free will. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(2), 211–224.
Monroe, A. E., Brady, G. L., & Malle, B. F. (2017, March 1). This isn’t the free will worth looking for: General free will beliefs do not influence moral judgments, agent-specific choice ascriptions do. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 191–199.
Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Noûs, 41(4), 663–685.
Patil, Y. S., Chakram, S., & Vengalattore, M. (2015, October 2). Measurement-induced localization of an ultracold lattice gas. Physical Review Letters, 115(14), 140402.
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect (1st ed., p. 432). New York: Basic Books.
Pockett, S. (2002). On subjective back-referral and how long it takes to become conscious of a stimulus: A reinterpretation of Libet’s data. Consciousness and Cognition, 11(2), 141–161.
Rosenblum, B., & Kuttner, F. (2011). Quantum enigma: Physics encounters consciousness (2nd ed., p. 304). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Schwartz, J. M., Stapp, H. P., & Beauregard, M. (2005). Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: A new model with respect to mind/brain interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360(1458), 1309–1327.
Smilansky, S. (2000). Free will and illusion (1st ed., p. 344). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Stapp, H. P. (2011). Mindful universe: Quantum mechanics and the participating observer (2nd ed., p. 230). Berlin/New York: Springer.
Stapp, H. P. (2017). Quantum theory and free will: How mental intentions translate into bodily actions (1st ed., p. 142). New York: Springer.
Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F., & Mele, A. R. (2011). Free will in everyday life: Autobiographical accounts of free and unfree actions. Philosophical Psychology, 24(3), 381–394.
von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wagner, D. M. (2003). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
Walter, H. (2009). Neurophilosophy of free will: From libertarian illusions to a concept of natural autonomy (p. 420). MIT Press.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement is due to Henry Stapp for extensive discussions, explanations, and feedback as the ideas expressed in this paper evolved. Appreciation is extended to participants in the April 2018 International Conference on Quanta and the Mind for stimulating discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laskey, K.B. (2019). A Quantum Model of Non-illusory Free Will. In: de Barros, J.A., Montemayor, C. (eds) Quanta and Mind. Synthese Library, vol 414. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21908-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21908-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21907-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21908-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)