Skip to main content

Regionalism in Latin America: Eclectic, Multi-faceted and Multi-layered

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 17))

Abstract

Regionalism in Latin America is a complex phenomenon. This chapter will argue that after a sequence of various waves of regionalization efforts, Latin-American regionalism has become multi-layered, multi-faceted and eclectic. It is characterized by a large set of different arrangements, both formal and informal in nature and structure, and various regimes and regional institutions currently coexist. It is the result of a large variety of different drivers and influential factors, both endogenous as well as exogenous which has resulted in what can best be labelled “the alphabet soup of Latin American regionalism”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, this is not only the Latin American case. Regionalism in Africa includes a myriad of economic and security organizations. There is not a single bloc in the whole Pacific Rim or in the whole Asian continent. The Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) is being transformed by new initiatives such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership that include China, Australia, New Zealand and India or the almost disappeared Transpacific Partnership (TPP). The idea of a single regional project that has widened and deepened has as empirical evidence just the European Union, that certainly became hegemonic in Western Europe, despite the existence of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) or the Council of Europe in the field of Human Rights.

  2. 2.

    For a complete overview, start at the SICA (2017) “Homepage” [online] accessible at http://www.sica.int/

  3. 3.

    Venezuela was temporarily suspended from MERCOSUR’s membership in December 2016 for failing to comply with membership requirements, in particular the incorporation of several Mercosur decisions and norms into Venezuelan legislation. In April 2017 the Mercosur Democratic Clause was activated due to the Venezuelan Supreme Court’s decision to suspend the powers of the National Assembly further limiting participation of Venezuela in the MERCOSUR system.

Further Readings

  • Malamud, A., & Gardini, G. L. (2012). Has regionalism peaked? The Latin American quagmire and its lessons. The International Spectator, 47(1), 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, D. (2014). Latin America’s new regional architecture: A cooperative or segmented regional governance complex? Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, RSCAS 2014/89, 34p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivares, E., & Dolcetti-Marcolini, M. (2016). Two regionalisms, two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a critical and decolonial IPE. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 866–882.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Bianculli, A. C. (2010). Trade governance in Latin America. Interest articulation and institutions across negotiations in Argentina and Chile. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 370p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianculli, A. C. (2016). Latin America. In T. A. Börzel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 154–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceño Ruiz, J. (2014). Los congresos hispanoamericanos en el siglo XIX: identidad, amenazas externas e intereses en la construcción del regionalismo. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales de la UNAM, 118, 131–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancilleria. (2018). Union of South American Nations, UNASUR [online]. Available https://www.cancilleria.gob.ec/union-of-south-american-nations-unasur/. Accessed 13 Oct 2018.

  • Cienfuegos, M., & Sanahuja, J. A. (2010). Una región en construcción: UNASUR y la integración en América del Sur. CIDOB, Barcelona, 412p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communidad Andina. (2017). Portal de la Comunidad Andina. Accessible at http://www.comunidadandina.org

  • Cooper, A., & Legler, T. (2006). Intervention without intervening?: The OAS defense and promotion of democracy in the Americas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, R. (2016). Correa outlines CELAC priorities [online]. Available https://videosenglish.telesurtv.net/video/344215/correa-outlines-celac-priorities/aspx. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Chasteen, J. (2008). Americanos: Latin America’s struggle for Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, A. (2018). Understanding ALBA: The Progress, problems, and prospects of alternative regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabène, O. (2009). The politics of regional integration in Latin America: Theoretical and comparative explorations (258p). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabène, O. (2012). La gauche en Amérique latine, 1998–2012 (464p). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lombaerde, P., & Garay, L. J. (2008). El nuevo regionalismo en América Latina. In P. De Lombaerde, S. Kochi, & J. Briceño Ruíz (Eds.), Del regionalismo latinoamericano a la integración interregional (pp. 3–35). Madrid: Fundación Carolina – Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lombaerde, P., & Schulz, M. (Eds.). (2009). The EU and world regionalism: The makability of regions in the 21st century (297p). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctor, M. (2013). Why bother with inter-regionalism? Negotiations for a European Union – Mercosur agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 281–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, R. (2015). EU foreign policy towards Latin America (185p). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. (2016). Preliminary overview of the economies of Latin America and the Caribbean (133p). Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EULAC Foundation. (2017). The Carribbean in the European Union- Community of Latin American and Caribbean States Partnership (126p). Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L., & Serrano, M. (Eds.). (2005). Regionalism and governance in the Americas: Continental drift (284p). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzón, J. F. (2015) Multipolarity and the future of regionalism: Latin America and beyond (GIGA Working Papers, No. 264, 34p).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickhouse, R. (2012). Explainer: An alphabet soup of regional integration organizations [online]. Available at http://www.as-coa.org/articles/explainer-alphabet-soup-regional-integration-organizations/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Gomez-Mera, L. (2015). International regime complexity and regional governance: Evidence from the Americas. Global Governance, 21, 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A. (1995). Explaining the resurgence of regionalism in world politics. Review of International Studies, 21, 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazeh, K., & Clark, D. P. (1990). A case study of effects of developing country integration on trade flows: The Andean pact. Journal of Latin American Studies, 22(1–2), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, G. P. (2014). Presentacion en el Cuadragésimo Quinto aniversario de suscripcion del Acuerdo de Cartagena, Lima, 4p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, A. (2008). The internal agenda of Mercosur: Interdependence, leadership and institutionalization. Los nuevos enfoques de la integración: más allá del regionalismo (pp. 115–135). Quito: FLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, A. (2013). Overlapping regionalism, no integration: Conceptual issues and the Latin American experiences (EUI Working Papers RSCAS, pp. 1–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, A., & Gardini, G. L. (2012). Has regionalism peaked? The Latin American quagmire and its lessons. The International Spectator, 47(1), 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzetti, L. (1993a). The political economy of privatization through divestiture in lesser developed economies. Comparative Politics, 25, 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzetti, L. (1993b). Institutions, parties, and coalitions in Argentine politics (382p). University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrossan, P. (2015). The political economy of EU interregionalism. Doctoral dissertation, Dublin City University, 274p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, K. (2016). Interregionalism re-loaded: Assessing the EU-MERCOSUR negotiations. St Antony’s International Review, 11(2), 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercosur. (2017). Mercosur in brief. Online accessible at: https://www.mercosur.int/en/about-mercosur/mercosur-in-brief/

  • Mercosur. (2019). Mercosur in brief. Online accessible at: https://www.mercosur.int/en/about-mercosur/mercosur-in-brief/

  • Meyer, P. J. (2018). Organization of American States: Background and issues for Congress (27p). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncayo, E., De Lombaerde, P., & Guinea Ibáñez, O. (2012). Latin American regionalism and the role of UN-ECLAC, 1948-2010. In C. Auroi & M. Helg (Eds.), Latin America 1810–2010. Dreams and legacies (pp. 359–386). London: Imperial College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, D. (2014). Latin America’s new regional architecture: a cooperative or segmented regional governance complex?. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, RSCAS 2014/89, 34p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, D. (2016). The Pacific Alliance: Nation-branding through regional Organisations. GIGA Focus Lateinamerika, 04, 13p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, D., & Comini, N. (2016). UNASUR: Regional pluralism as a strategic outcome. Contexto International, 38(2), 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OAS. (2014). Resolution on strategic vision with a view to adapting the organization to the challenges of the 21st century. E-370/14, Washington, DC, 3p.

    Google Scholar 

  • OAS. (2017). Who we are [online]. Available http://www.oas.org/en/about/who_we_are.asp. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • O’Keefe, T. A. (1996). How the Andean pact transformed itself into a friend of foreign enterprise. International Law, 30, 811–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozco, G., Dominguez, R., & Carrera, M. (2016). The matrix of regional governance in Latin America (12p). Academia.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena, C., & Rozemberg, R. (2005). Una aproximación al desarrollo institucional del MERCOSUR: sus fortalezas y debilidades (Occasional Paper ITD= Documento de Divulgación ITD; n. 31) (Vol. 31). BID-INTAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perales, J. R. (2003). A supply-side theory of international economic institutions for the Mercosur. In F. Laursen (Ed.), Comparative regional integration. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 75–101). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenta, G. F., & Arantes, P. C. (2014). Rethinking integration in Latin America: The “Pink tide” and the post-neoliberal regionalism. FLASCO-ISA joint international conference, 20p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntigliano, A. R., & Briceño-Ruiz, J. (Eds.). (2013). The resilience of regionalism in Latin America (Autonomy and development, 273p) New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettberg, A., De Lombaerde, P., Lizarazo Rodríguez, L. and Ortiz-Riomalo, J. (2014). Rights, free trade, and politics: The strategic use of a rights discourse in the negotiation of free trade agreements (FTAs). Available at HYPERLINK https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428668. Accessed 8 June 2019. [online].

  • Riggirozzi, P., & Grugel, J. (2015). Regional governance and legitimacy in South America: The meaning of UNASUR. International Affairs, 91(4), 781–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinke, B. y Scheneckener, U. (2012). Informalisation of world politics? Global governance by clubs. In T. Debiel, et al. (Eds.), Global trends 2013. Peace, development, enviroment (pp. 21–35). Bonn: Development and Peace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, G. (1991). Un Informe Crítico a 30 años de Integración en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 113, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad-Filho, A., & Johnston, D. (2005). Neoliberalism: A critical reader (268p). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, J. A. (2012). Regionalismo post-liberal y multilateralismo en Sudamérica: El caso de UNASUR. Anuario de Integración Regional de América Latina y el Caribe, pp. 19–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, J. A. (2015). The EU and CELAC: Reinvigorating a strategic partnership. Hamburg: EU-LAC Foundation, 85p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, J. A., et al. (2015). Beyond 2015: Perspectives and proposals for development cooperation between the European Union and Latin America and the Caribbean (134p). Hamburg: EU-LAC Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selleslaghs, J. (2014). The EU’s role and interest in promoting regional integration in Central America (30p). Bruges: UNU-CRIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • SG-SICA. (2017). SG-SICA en Breve [online]. Available https://www.sica.int/sgsica/sgsica_breve.aspx. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • SICA. (2017). Instancias regionals del SICA [online]. Available https://www.sica.int/sica/instituciones.aspx. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Tussie, D. (2009). Latin America: Contrasting motivations for regional projects. Review of International Studies, 35(S1), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tussie, D. & Riggirozzi, P. (2012). The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism. The case of Latin America (203p). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villareal, M. A. (2016). The Pacific Alliance: A trade integration initiative in Latin America. In Congressional research service (pp. 7–5700).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivares, E., & Dolcetti-Marcolini, M. (2016). Two regionalisms, two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a critical and decolonial IPE. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 866–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joren Selleslaghs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Selleslaghs, J., Ruiz, J.B., de Lombaerde, P. (2020). Regionalism in Latin America: Eclectic, Multi-faceted and Multi-layered. In: Hosli, M.O., Selleslaghs, J. (eds) The Changing Global Order. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21603-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics