Abstract
An individual’s personality is among the most established predictors of job performance, and personality factors in aggregate are predictive of team performance across a range of team types. However, a recent review of a decade’s worth of quantitative and mixed-methods research articles on science teams identified no empirical studies on the impact of personality on science teams (Hall et al. 2018). As such, there is a need to look to the broader teams literature to learn what we can about how personality may impact science teams. This chapter provides an introduction to the most commonly used framework for understanding personality, the Five Factor Model. It then summarizes what is known from the teams literature about the influence of personality factors on team effectiveness, and considers the potential interactions of personality with team processes and emergent states. The chapter reflects on how personality traits may uniquely impact science teams given their interactions with key influences that are specific to scientific work, including scientific goals, the academic environment, and the culture of the scientific enterprise. Finally, the chapter recommends future conceptual and methodological research directions to advance our understanding of the influence of personality factors, as they interact with one another and a range of other critical influencing factors, on the effectiveness of science teams.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
03 March 2020
The published version of the book has missed to include the corresponding authors’ e-mail address for chapters 14, 35 and 44. Affiliation correction provided for the author Dr. Milton Eder in chapter 9 has been missed to update in the list of contributors. The affiliation detail for the author Dr. Stephen M were published incorrectly in chapter 33. Also, the text in the Abstract section which reads “(cite other chapters in team science book).” was not removed during the copy editing stage. These errors have been corrected, and the text has been updated in the book.
References
Barrick MR, Mount MK. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol. 1991;44:1–26.
Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(3):377–91.
Barry B, Stewart GL. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82:62–78.
Bell S. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:595–615.
Bell S. Tapping into the power of team composition for science teams. Clearwater Beach, FL: Featured presentation at Annual Science of Team Science; 2017.
Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman WC, editors. Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 1993. p. 71–98.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. 4 ways 5 factors are basic. Personal Individ Differ. 1992;13(6):653–65.
Driskell JE, Hogan R, Salas E. Personality and group performance. Rev Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;14:91–112.
Hall KL, Vogel AL, Huang GC, Serrano KJ, Rice EL, Tsakraklides SP, Fiore SM. The science of team science: a review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. Am Psychol. 2018;73(4):532–48.
Hall KL, Vogel AL, Stipelman B, Stokols D, Morgan G, Gehlert S. A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: goals, team processes, and strategies. Transl Behav Med. 2012;2(4):415–30.
Hurtz GM, Donovan JJ. Personality and job performance: the big five revisited. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85:869–79.
Juhász M. Influence of personality on teamwork behaviour and communication. Soc Manage Sci. 2010;18(2):63–77. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.2010-2.02.
Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. Work groups and teams in organizations. In: Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, editors. Handbook of psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 12. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2003. p. 333–75.
Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. Evidence-based principles and strategies for optimizing team functioning and performance in science teams. In: Hall KL, Vogel AL, Croyle RT, editors. Strategies for team science success: handbook of evidence-based principles for cross-disciplinary science and practical lessons learned from health researchers. New York, NY: Springer; 2019.
Lam TK. The influence of team trust, potency and leadership on the intent to share knowledge and team creativity, DBA thesis. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University; 2012.
LePine JA. Team adaptation and post change performance: effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88:27–39.
McCrae RR, Costa PT. Validation of the 5-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(1):81–90.
Miron-Spektor E, Erez M, Naveh E. The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad Manag J. 2011;54(4):740–60.
Mohammed S, Angell L. Personality heterogeneity in teams: which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Res. 2003;34(6):651–77.
Mohammed S, Mathieu JE, Bartlett LB. Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: considering the influence of team- and task-related composition variables. J Organ Behav. 2002;23:795–814.
Molleman E, Nauta A, Jehn KA. Person-job fit applied to teamwork: a multilevel approach. Small Group Res. 2004;35:515–39.
Mount MK, Barrick MR, Stewart GL. Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Hum Perform. 1998;11(2–3):145–65.
Morgeson FP, Reider MH, Campion MA. Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology 2005;58(3):583–611.
Neuman GA, Wagner SH, Christiansen ND. The relationship between work team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group Org Manag. 1999;24(1):28–45.
Neuman GA, Wright J. Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999;84(3):376–389.
O'Neill TA, Allen NJ. Personality and the prediction of team performance. Eur J Personal. 2011;25(1):31–42.
Peeters MA, Rutte CG, van Tuijl HF, Reymen IM. The big five personality traits and individual satisfaction with the team. Small Group Res. 2006b;37(2):187–211.
Peeters MA, Rutte CG, van Tuijl HF, Reymen IM. Designing in teams: does personality matter? Small Group Res. 2008;39(4):438–67.
Peeters MAG, van Tuijl HFJM, Rutte CG, Reymen MJ. Personality and team performance: a meta-analysis. Eur J Personal. 2006a;20:377–96.
Porter CO, Hollenbeck JR, Ilgen DR, Ellis AP, West BJ, Moon H. Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(3):391–403.
Prewett MS, Walvoord AAG, Stilson FRB, Rossi ME, Brannick MT. The team personality-team performance relationship revisited: the impact of criterion choice, pattern of workflow, and method of aggregation. Hum Perform. 2009;22(4):273–96.
Salgado JF. Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2003;76:323–46.
Stock RM, von Hippel E, Gillert NL. Impacts of personality traits on consumer innovation success. Res Policy. 2016;45(4):57–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.002.
Stout RJ, Salas E, Carson R. Individual Task Proficiency and Team Process Behavior: What's Important for Team Functioning? Military Psychology 2009;6(3):177–192.
Taggar S. Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Acad Manag J. 2002;45:315–30.
Tett RP, Jackson DN, Rothstein M, Reddon JR. Meta-analysis of bidirectional relations in personality-job performance research. Hum Perform. 1999;12:1–29.
Van Vianen AEM, De Dreu CKW. Personality in teams: its relations to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. Eur J Work Organ Psy. 2001;10:97–120.
Xia L, Ya S. Study on knowledge sharing behavior engineering. Syst Eng Procedia. 2012;4:468–76.
Acknowledgments
This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stipelman, B.A., Rice, E.L., Vogel, A.L., Hall, K.L. (2019). The Role of Team Personality in Team Effectiveness and Performance. In: Hall, K., Vogel, A., Croyle, R. (eds) Strategies for Team Science Success. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20990-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20992-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)