Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Closed-World Semantics for Conjunctive Queries with Negation over \(\mathcal {ELH}_\bot \) Ontologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11468))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ontology-mediated query answering is a popular paradigm for enriching answers to user queries with background knowledge. For querying the absence of information, however, there exist only few ontology-based approaches. Moreover, these proposals conflate the closed-domain and closed-world assumption, and therefore are not suited to deal with the anonymous objects that are common in ontological reasoning. We propose a new closed-world semantics for answering conjunctive queries with negation over ontologies formulated in the description logic , which is based on the minimal canonical model. We propose a rewriting strategy for dealing with negated query atoms, which shows that query answering is possible in polynomial time in data complexity.

This work was supported by the DFG grant BA 1122/19-1 (GOASQ) and grant 389792660 (TRR 248) (see https://perspicuous-computing.science).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://bioportal.bioontology.org.

  2. 2.

    https://clinicaltrials.gov.

  3. 3.

    https://n2c2.dbmi.hms.harvard.edu.

  4. 4.

    An exclusion criterion in https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01463215.

  5. 5.

    https://www.snomed.org/snomed-ct.

  6. 6.

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01960803.

  7. 7.

    http://www.opengalen.org/.

References

  1. Ahmetaj, S., Ortiz, M., Simkus, M.: Polynomial datalog rewritings for expressive description logics with closed predicates. In: Kambhampati, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2016), pp. 878–885. AAAI Press (2016). https://www.ijcai.org/Abstract/16/129

  2. Arenas, M., Gottlob, G., Pieris, A.: Expressive languages for querying the semantic web. In: Hull, R., Grohe, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2014), pp. 14–26. ACM (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2594538.2594555

  3. Aronson, A.R.: Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pp. 17–21. American Medical Informatics Association (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\cal{EL}\) envelope. In: Kaelbling, L.P., Saffiotti, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), pp. 364–369. Professional Book Center (2005). http://ijcai.org/Proceedings/09/Papers/053.pdf

  5. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bárány, V., ten Cate, B., Otto, M.: Queries with guarded negation. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(11), 1328–1339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.14778/2350229.2350250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Besana, P., Cuggia, M., Zekri, O., Bourde, A., Burgun, A.: Using semantic web technologies for clinical trial recruitment. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6497, pp. 34–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17749-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bienvenu, M., Ortiz, M.: Ontology-mediated query answering with data-tractable description logics. In: Faber, W., Paschke, A. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2015. LNCS, vol. 9203, pp. 218–307. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21768-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonomi, L., Jiang, X.: Patient ranking with temporally annotated data. J. Biomed. Inform. 78, 43–53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Calvanese, D., et al.: Ontop: answering SPARQL queries over relational databases. Semant. Web 8, 471–487 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Epistemic first-order queries over description logic knowledge bases. In: Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Toman, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2006). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 189, pp. 51–61 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cresswell, K.M., Sheikh, A.: Inpatient clinical information systems. In: Sheikh, A., Cresswell, K.M., Wright, A., Bates, D.W. (eds.) Key Advances in Clinical Informatics, Chap. 2, pp. 13–29. Academic Press (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809523-2.00002-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Crowe, C.L., Tao, C.: Designing ontology-based patterns for the representation of the time-relevant eligibility criteria of clinical protocols. AMIA Joint Summits Transl. Sci. Proc. 2015, 173–177 (2015). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525239/

  14. Deutsch, A., Nash, A., Remmel, J.B.: The chase revisited. In: Lenzerini, M., Lembo, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2008), pp. 149–158. ACM (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1376916.1376938

  15. Eiter, T., Ortiz, M., Šimkus, M., Tran, T.K., Xiao, G.: Query rewriting for horn-\(\cal{SHIQ}\) plus rules. In: Hoffmann, J., Selman, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2012), pp. 726–733. AAAI Press (2012). http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI12/paper/view/4931

  16. Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P.G., Miller, R.J., Popa, L.: Data exchange: semantics and query answering. Theor. Comput. Sci. 336(1), 89–124 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2004.10.033

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutiérrez-Basulto, V., Ibáñez-García, Y., Kontchakov, R., Kostylev, E.V.: Queries with negation and inequalities over lightweight ontologies. J. Web Semant. 35, 184–202 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hernich, A., Kupke, C., Lukasiewicz, T., Gottlob, G.: Well-founded semantics for extended datalog and ontological reasoning. In: Hull, R., Fan, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2013), pp. 225–236. ACM (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2463664.2465229

  19. Hripcsak, G., Zhou, L., Parsons, S., Das, A.K., Johnson, S.B.: Modeling electronic discharge summaries as a simple temporal constraint satisfaction problem. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(1), 55–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, A.E.W., et al.: MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci. Data 3(160035), 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kharlamov, E., et al.: Ontology based data access in Statoil. Web Semant. 44, 3–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2017.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kontchakov, R., Lutz, C., Toman, D., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: The combined approach to ontology-based data access. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 2656–2661. AAAI Press (2011). https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-442

  23. Köpcke, F., Prokosch, H.U.: Employing computers for the recruitment into clinical trials: a comprehensive systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(7), e161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lutz, C., Seylan, I., Wolter, F.: Ontology-based data access with closed predicates is inherently intractable (sometimes). In: Rossi, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013), pp. 1024–1030. AAAI Press (2013). https://www.ijcai.org/Abstract/13/156

  25. Lutz, C., Toman, D., Wolter, F.: Conjunctive query answering in the description logic \(\cal{EL}\) using a relational database system. In: Boutilier, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), pp. 2070–2075. AAAI Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marnette, B.: Generalized schema mappings: from termination to tractability. In: Paredaens, J., Su, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2009), pp. 13–22. ACM (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1559795.1559799

  27. Mugnier, M.-L., Thomazo, M.: An introduction to ontology-based query answering with existential rules. In: Koubarakis, M., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2014. LNCS, vol. 8714, pp. 245–278. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10587-1_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Ni, Y., et al.: Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: Automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making 15, 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0149-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel, C., et al.: Matching patient records to clinical trials using ontologies. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 816–829. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Savova, G.K., et al.: Mayo clinical text analysis and knowledge extraction system (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17(5), 507–513 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tagaris, A., et al.: Exploiting ontology based search and EHR interoperability to facilitate clinical trial design. In: Koutsouris, D.-D., Lazakidou, A.A. (eds.) Concepts and Trends in Healthcare Information Systems. AIS, vol. 16, pp. 21–42. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06844-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Wolter, F.: First order common knowledge logics. Studia Logica 65(2), 249–271 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005271815356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair for Automata Theory, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Stefan Borgwardt & Walter Forkel

Authors
  1. Stefan Borgwardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Walter Forkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Borgwardt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Calabria, Rende, Italy

    Francesco Calimeri

  2. University of Calabria, Rende, Italy

    Nicola Leone

  3. Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy

    Marco Manna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Borgwardt, S., Forkel, W. (2019). Closed-World Semantics for Conjunctive Queries with Negation over \(\mathcal {ELH}_\bot \) Ontologies. In: Calimeri, F., Leone, N., Manna, M. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11468. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19569-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19570-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation