Skip to main content

Adorno on the Meaning of Phenomenology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hegel and Phenomenology

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 102))

  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper I reconstruct Adorno’s arguments against the phenomenological project as developed by Husserl in the early phase of his thought, with particular focus on the dialectical nature and meaning of such a critique. Primary references are Adorno’s article Husserl and the Problem of Idealism, published in 1940, and his book Against Epistemology: A Metacritique, published in 1956. I argue that, for Adorno, Husserl’s attempt must be understood as both logically impossible and theoretically productive. After laying down the general framework of Adorno’s reading in the first three sections, I examine his criticism of Husserl’s “involuntary dialectic” in detail, also with the help of an independent analysis of some ambiguities in Husserl’s concept of “categorial intuition”. In the last section, I explain why and under what conditions, according to Adorno, the original impulse of Husserlian phenomenology toward an intact knowledge of “things themselves” needs to be maintained in spite of all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Wolff (2006).

  2. 2.

    See Tiedemann (1997).

  3. 3.

    See Tiedemann (1997, 386).

  4. 4.

    See Testa (2011).

  5. 5.

    Quoted in: Adorno (1993, 67).

  6. 6.

    See O’Connor (2004, 127–148).

  7. 7.

    See Zanotti (2014, especially 71–76).

  8. 8.

    See Miller (2009).

  9. 9.

    See Adorno (1986, 129–132).

  10. 10.

    It can also be conjectured that if Adorno had dealt with the idea of a “passive synthesis”, he might have found it no less antinomic – and interesting – than categorial intuition itself.

  11. 11.

    This well-known formulation had already been used in a letter to Benjamin (Adorno and Benjamin 1994, 417), and then repeated in the Dialectic of Enlightenment (Horkheimer and Adorno 2002, 191).

  12. 12.

    See for example Adorno (1993, 14–17).

  13. 13.

    See Adorno (2013, chap. 4, especially 224–234).

  14. 14.

    See above, 7–8.

  15. 15.

    Quoted in: Adorno (1993, 67).

  16. 16.

    Quoted in: Adorno (1993, 67).

  17. 17.

    “The farther Hegel takes idealism, even epistemologically, the closer he comes to social materialism; the more he insists, against Kant, on comprehending his subject matter from the inside out” (Adorno 1993, 68).

  18. 18.

    See Adorno (1986, 120).

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1986. Husserl and the Problem of Idealism. In Id. Gesammelte Schriften in zwanzig Bänden, ed. R. Tiedemann in cooperation with G. Adorno, S. Buck-Morss, and K. Schultz, vol. 20/1, 119–134. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Hegel: Three Studies. Trans. S.W. Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Negative Dialectics. Trans. E.B. Ashton. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Einführung in die Dialektik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Against Epistemology: A Metacritique. Trans. W. Domingo. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W., and Walter Benjamin. 1994. Briefwechsel 1928–1940. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1962. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, vol. 1. Trans. E.B. Speirs and J.B. Sanderson. New York: The Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. System der Philosophie. Erster Teil. Die Logik. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. Logic: Part One of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Trans. W. Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1985. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Trans. T. Kisiel. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. E. Jephcott. Stanford: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical Investigations. Trans. J.N. Findlay, vol. 2. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1963. The Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. N. Kemp-Smith. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1970. The German Ideology. Trans. C. Dutt, W. Lough, and C.P. Magill. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Jared A. 2009. Phenomenology’s Negative Dialectic: Adorno’s Critique of Husserl’s Epistemological Foundationalism. The Philosophical Forum 40: 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Brian. 2004. Adorno’s Negative Dialectic. Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, Italo. 2011. La Metacritica di Adorno nella costellazione contemporanea. Epistemologia dialettica e post-empirismo. In Percorsi della dialettica nel Novecento, ed. M.L. Lanzillo and S. Rodeschini, 93–124. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann, Rolf. 1997. Editorische Nachbemerkung. In: T.W. Adorno. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, 385–386. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Trans. D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Ernst. 2006. From Phenomenology to Critical Theory. The Genesis of Adorno’s Critical Theory from His Reading of Husserl. Philosophy & Social Criticism 32: 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanotti, Giovanni. 2014. La psyché démodée. Psychanalyse et objectivité sociale chez Adorno. Meta. Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy VI (1): 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zanotti, G. (2019). Adorno on the Meaning of Phenomenology. In: Ferrarin, A., Moran, D., Magrì, E., Manca, D. (eds) Hegel and Phenomenology. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17546-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics