Skip to main content

Filtering Email Addresses, Credit Card Numbers and Searching for Bitcoin Artifacts with the Autopsy Digital Forensics Software

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR 2018) (SoCPaR 2018)

Abstract

Email addresses and credit card numbers found on digital forensic images are frequently an important asset in a forensic casework. However, the automatic harvesting of these data often yields many false positives. This paper presents the Forensic Enhanced Analysis (FEA) module for the Autopsy digital forensic software. FEA aims to eliminate false positives of email addresses and credit card numbers harvested by Autopsy, thus reducing the workload of the forensic examiner. FEA also harvests potential Bitcoin public addresses and private keys and validates them by looking into Bitcoin’s blockchain for the transactions linked to public addresses. FEA explores the report functionality of Autopsy and allows exports in CSV, HTML and XLS formats. Experimental results over four digital forensic images show that FEA eliminates as many as \(40\%\) of email addresses and \(55\%\) of credit card numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.sleuthkit.org/autopsy/.

  2. 2.

    FEA is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1006703 (GPLv3 license).

  3. 3.

    www.sleuthkit.org.

  4. 4.

    Available at data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt.

  5. 5.

    ISO/IEC 7812-1:2006. Identification cards – Identification of issuers – Part 1: Numbering system.

References

  1. Paul, P.K., Bhuimali, A., Shivraj, K.S.: Internet corporation for assigned names and numbers: an overview. Asian J. Eng. Appl. Technol. 5(2), 40–43 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bahnsen, A.C., Aouada, D., Stojanovic, A., Ottersten, B.: Feature engineering strategies for credit card fraud detection. Expert Syst. Appl. 51, 134–142 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duchamp, D., et al.: Prefetching hyperlinks. In: USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, pp. 12–23 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elz, R., Bush, R.: Clarifications to the DNS specification. Technical report (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eskandari, S., Leoutsarakos, A., Mursch, T., Clark, J.: A first look at browser-based Cryptojacking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02887 (2018)

  6. Garfinkel, S.: AFF and AFF4: where we are, where we are going, and why it matters to you. In: Sleuth Kit and Open Source Digital Forensics Conference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garfinkel, S.L.: Digital media triage with bulk data analysis and bulk\(\_\)extractor. Comput. Secur. 32, 56–72 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jung, J., Sit, E., Balakrishnan, H., Morris, R.: DNS performance and the effectiveness of caching. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 10(5), 589–603 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klensin, J.: RFC 5321: simple mail transfer protocol (2008). https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321

  10. Liao, K., Zhao, Z., Doupé, A., Ahn, G.J.: Behind closed doors: measurement and analysis of CryptoLocker ransoms in Bitcoin. In: 2016 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime), pp. 1–13. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Panchal, E.P.: Extraction of persistence and volatile forensics evidences from computer system. Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol. (IJCTT) 4(5), 964–968 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Postel, J.: Domain name system structure and delegation (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Resnick, P.: RFC 5322: Internet message format (2008). https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322

  15. Rowe, N.C., Schwamm, R., McCarrin, M.R., Gera, R.: Making sense of email addresses on drives. J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law: JDFSL 11(2), 153 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wachira, W., Waweru, K., Nyaga, L.: Transposition error detection in Luhn’s algorithm. Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci. Technol. 30(1), 24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by FCT, Instituto de Telecomunicações under project UID/EEA/50008/2013 and CIIC under project UID/CEC/04524/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricio Domingues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Domingues, P., Frade, M., Parreira, J.M. (2020). Filtering Email Addresses, Credit Card Numbers and Searching for Bitcoin Artifacts with the Autopsy Digital Forensics Software. In: Madureira, A., Abraham, A., Gandhi, N., Silva, C., Antunes, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR 2018). SoCPaR 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 942. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17065-3_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics