Skip to main content

Extent of Mesenteric Resection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 507 Accesses

Abstract

Rates of surgery in Crohn’s disease have remained largely unchanged. Indeed, a rather substantial proportion of patients with Crohn’s disease continue to require one of more operations. In addition, the proportion requiring re-operation is also significant with rates varying between 4% and 60%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burke JP, Velupillai Y, O’Connell PR, Coffey JC. National trends in intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease in the post-biologic era. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(10):1401–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coffey JC, Kiernan MG, Sahebally SM, Jarrar A, Burke JP, Kiely PA, et al. Inclusion of the mesentery in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease is associated with reduced surgical recurrence. J Crohns Colitis. 2018;. jjx187-jjx

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aratari A, Papi C, Leandro G, Viscido A, Capurso L, Caprilli R. Early versus late surgery for ileo-caecal Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(10):1303–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Eshuis EJ, Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Ferrante M, D’Haens GR, et al. Short- and medium-term outcomes following primary ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease in two specialist centres. Br J Surg. 2017;104(12):1713–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bordeianou L, Stein SL, Ho VP, Dursun A, Sands BE, Korzenik JR, et al. Immediate versus tailored prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic recurrences after surgery for ileocecal Crohn’s disease? Surgery. 2011;149(1):72–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Riss S, Schuster I, Papay P, Herbst F, Mittlbock M, Chitsabesan P, et al. Surgical recurrence after primary ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(4):365–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. An V, Cohen L, Lawrence M, Thomas M, Andrews J, Moore J. Early surgery in Crohn’s disease a benefit in selected cases. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(7):492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Kerremans R, Coenegrachts JL, Coremans G. Natural history of recurrent Crohn’s disease at the ileocolonic anastomosis after curative surgery. Gut. 1984;25(6):665–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iesalnieks I, Kilger A, Glass H, Muller-Wille R, Klebl F, Ott C, et al. Intraabdominal septic complications following bowel resection for Crohn’s disease: detrimental influence on long-term outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(12):1167–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Connelly TM, Messaris E. Predictors of recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolectomy: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(39):14393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Beyls J, Kerremans R, Hiele M. Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1990;99(4):956–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Post S, Herfarth C, Bohm E, Timmermanns G, Schumacher H, Schurmann G, et al. The impact of disease pattern, surgical management, and individual surgeons on the risk for relaparotomy for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg. 1996;223(3):253–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto T, Shiraki M, Nakahigashi M, Umegae S, Matsumoto K. Enteral nutrition to suppress postoperative Crohn’s disease recurrence: a five-year prospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(3):335–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borley NR, Mortensen NJ, Jewell DP. Preventing postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 1997;84(11):1493–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fornaro R, Caratto E, Caratto M, Fornaro F, Caristo G, Frascio M, et al. Post-operative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Critical analysis of potential risk factors. An update. Surgeon. 2015;13(6):330–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamamoto T. Factors affecting recurrence after surgery for Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(26):3971–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G. Risk factors for surgery and postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg. 2000;231(1):38–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutgeerts P. Strategies in the prevention of post-operative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;17(1):63–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cunningham MF, Docherty NG, Coffey JC, Burke JP, O’Connell PR. Postsurgical recurrence of ileal Crohn’s disease: an update on risk factors and intervention points to a central role for impaired host-microflora homeostasis. World J Surg. 2010;34(7):1615–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coffey JC, O’Leary DP. The mesentery: structure, function, and role in disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(3):238–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coffey JC. O‘Leary DP, Kiernan MG, Faul P. The mesentery in Crohn’s disease: friend or foe? Curr Op Gastroenterol. 2016;32(4):267–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bunni J. The primacy of embryological, ontogenetic and specimen orientated (mesenteric) surgery as the most important tool in treating visceral (colorectal) cancer. Mesentery Peritoneum. 2017;1(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Strong SA. Mesenteric division in Crohn’s disease. Oper Tech Gen Surg. 2007;9(1):30–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaffer VO, Wexner SD. Surgical management of Crohn’s disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;398(1):13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bayless TMH, Hanauer SB. IBD and Crohn’s disease. Advanced therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. 2. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alexander-Williams J. Surgical management. In: Kumar D, Alexander-Williams J, editors. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. London: Springer; 1993. p. 41–4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Bainbridge A, Greenhalgh R, De Vita E, Bloom S, et al. Mural inflammation in Crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features. Radiology. 2009;252(3):712–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cornet A, Savidge TC, Cabarrocas J, Deng WL, Colombel JF, Lassmann H, et al. Enterocolitis induced by autoimmune targeting of enteric glial cells: a possible mechanism in Crohn’s disease? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(23):13306–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Chamaillard M, Gonzalez F, Beclin E, Decourcelle C, Antunes L, et al. Mesenteric fat in Crohn’s disease: a pathogenetic hallmark or an innocent bystander? Gut. 2007;56(4):577–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kredel L, Batra A, Siegmund B. Role of fat and adipokines in intestinal inflammation. Curr Op Gastroenterol. 2014;30(6):559–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Crohn BB, Ginzburg L, Oppenheimer GD. Regional ileitis; a pathologic and clinical entity. Am J Med. 1932;13(5):583–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brahme F, Lindstrom C. A comparative radiographic and pathological study of intestinal vaso-architecture in Crohn’s disease and in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1970;11(11):928–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ewe K, Herfarth C, Malchow H, Jesdinsky HJ. Postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease in relation to radicality of operation and sulfasalazine prophylaxis: a multicenter trial. Digestion. 1989;42(4):224–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet] Bethesda (MD). Identifier NCT02542904, Extensive Mesenteric Excision (EME) Versus Local Mesenteric Excision (LME) for Crohn’s Disease. National Library of Medicine (US). 2015 [cited 25/08/18]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02542904.

  35. ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet] Bethesda (MD). Identifier NCT03172143, Mesenteric Sparing for the Prevention of Recurrent Crohn’s Disease. National Library of Medicine (US). 2017 [cited 25/08/18]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03172143.

  36. Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Coffey JC, Peirce C. Should surgical intervention become a primary treatment modality in Crohn’s disease?—A review of the role of surgery and emerging surgical techniques. Mesentery Peritoneum. 2018;2(7)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Coffey JC, Lipman J. General techniques in mesenteric-based colorectal surgery. In: Coffey JC, Sehgal R, Walsh D, editors. Mesenteric principles of gastrointestinal surgery: basic and applied science. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press; 2017.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Coffey JC, Dillon M, Sehgal R, Dockery P, Quondamatteo F, Walsh D, et al. Mesenteric-based surgery exploits gastrointestinal, peritoneal, mesenteric and fascial continuity from duodenojejunal flexure to the anorectal junction--a review. Dig Surg. 2015;32(4):291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Culligan K, Coffey JC, Kiran RP, Kalady M, Lavery IC, Remzi FH. The mesocolon: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(4):421–8.. discussion 8-30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Culligan K, Remzi FH, Soop M, Coffey JC. Review of nomenclature in colonic surgery--proposal of a standardised nomenclature based on mesocolic anatomy. Surgeon. 2013;11(1):1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Culligan K, Sehgal R, Mulligan D, Dunne C, Walsh S, Quondamatteo F, et al. A detailed appraisal of mesocolic lymphangiology – an immunohistochemical and stereological analysis. J Anat. 2014;225(4):463–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Culligan K, Walsh S, Dunne C, Walsh M, Ryan S, Quondamatteo F, et al. The mesocolon: a histological and electron microscopic characterization of the mesenteric attachment of the colon prior to and after surgical mobilization. Ann Surg. 2014;260(6):1048–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Wilhelmsen M, et al. Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with ‘conventional’ colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2016;103(5):581–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Michelassi F, Hurst RD, Melis M, Rubin M, Cohen R, Gasparitis A, et al. Side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty in extensive Crohn’s disease: a prospective longitudinal study. Ann Surg. 2000;232(3):401–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Michelassi F, Taschieri A, Tonelli F, Sasaki I, Poggioli G, Fazio V, et al. An international, multicenter, prospective, observational study of the side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease. Dises Colon Rect. 2007;50(3):277–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Vermeire S, Vanbeckevoort D, Rimola J, Ferrante M, Van Assche G, et al. Modified side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty over the ileocaecal valve: an alternative to ileocaecal resection in extensive terminal ileal Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10(4):437–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Katsuno H, Maeda K, Hanai T, Masumori K, Koide Y, Kono T. Novel antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn (Kono-S) anastomoses for Crohn’s disease: a report of surgical procedure and short-term outcomes. Dig Surg. 2015;32(1):39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fichera A, Zoccali M, Kono T. Antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn (Kono-S) anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(7):1412–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kono T, Ashida T, Ebisawa Y, Chisato N, Okamoto K, Katsuno H, et al. A new antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn anastomosis: surgical prevention of anastomotic recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(5):586–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Calvin Coffey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kiernan, M.G., Coffey, J.C. (2019). Extent of Mesenteric Resection. In: Hyman, N., Fleshner, P., Strong, S. (eds) Mastery of IBD Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16755-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16755-4_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16754-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16755-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics