Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Classic (Analogue) to Digital Forms of Cultural Heritage Protection in Poland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Digital Cultural Heritage

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present research about some aspects of material entities that are part of the cultural heritage of Poland. The article examines characteristics of protection of this cultural heritage as expressed in activities dating from the early nineteenth century to modern times and indeed extending to the present moment which is much more digitally framed. Such activities now include some use of digital resources. In this article, special attention is paid to the fact that currently in Poland the classic analogue form of monuments registration dominates at the national, regional and local levels. A more developed digital historical monument database has great potential for progress in various ways. Apart from the fundamental function of gathering and recording information about cultural heritage, such a database also has a large information-disseminating, educational, and marketing potential. It can be used to create new digital resources for communication and presentation of cultural heritage, and for planning purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agenda 2030 – Transforming our world; The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Appadurai A. 2013. The Future as Cultural Fact, [In:] A. Appadurai, The Future as Cultural Fact-Essays on the Global Condition, Verso, London, 2013, 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bac-Bronowicz, J., Wojciechowska, G. (2016). The status of work on development of the database of architectural industrial heritage in Wrocław. Annals of Geomatics, 14(5 (75)), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baturay, M. H., Birtane, M. (2013). Responsive web design: a new type of design for web-based instructional content. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2275–2279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brundtland Report 1987. Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demetrykiewicz K. 1900–1916. Teka grona konserwatorów Galicyi Zachodniej. Książka została opatrzona wstępem Sokołowskiego, Biblioteka Jagiellońska, SYGNATURA 72058 IV i III, Tom I, Kraków CMC.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donohue R.G., Sack C.M., Roth R.E. 2014. Time series proportional symbol maps with Leaflet and JQuery. Cartographic Perspectives, 76, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gloger Z. 1907–1910. Budownictwo drzewne i wyroby z drzewa w dawnej Polsce. Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hernik J., Prus B., Ulman E., Dixon-Gough R. 2015. The Evolution of Małopolskie and Kraków as Destinations for Cultural Tourism. [In:] Hepperle E., Dixon-Gough R., Mansberger R., Paulsson J., Reuter F. and Yimay M. (eds.) Challenges for Governance Structures in Urban and Regional Development. European Academy of Land Use and Development. Vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holliman, G., Rowley, J. (2014). Business to business digital content marketing: marketers’ perceptions of best practice. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(4), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2014-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ionita A., Lepadatu C., Dumitrescu G. 2009. Digital Cultural Landscape Content. [In:] Hernik J. (ed.) Cultural Landscape – Across Disciplines, Oficyna Wydawnicza Branta, 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones M. 2007. The European Landscape Convention and question of public participation. Landscape Research, 32, 613–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kopera F., Lepszy L. 1916. Kościoły drewniane Galicyi Zachodniej. Serya 1. Die Holzkirchen Westgaliziens. I. Serie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Grona Konserwatorów Galicyi Zachodniej.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Król K., Szomorova L. 2015. The possibilities of using chosen jQuery JavaScript components in creating interactive maps. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape (GLL), 2, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Król, K., Gawroński, K., Gawrońska, G. (2013). Aplikacje multimedialne w zarządzaniu gminną ewidencją zabytków. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 1(IV), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, S. W., Fu, H. P. (2012). Uncovering critical success factors for business-to-customer electronic commerce in travel agencies. Journal of travel & tourism marketing, 29(6), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2012.703034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, J., Lu, Z. (2004). Development, distribution and evaluation of online tourism services in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 4(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ELEC.0000027981.81945.2a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mercado-Alonso I., Fernández-Tabales A. and Muñoz-Yules O. 2018. Perceptions and social valuations of landscape. Objectives and methodology for citizen participation in landscape policies. Landscape Research, 43:1, 95–111, https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1302570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Provincial Office 2018. Wykaz obiektów wpisanych do rejestru zabytków nieruchomych województwa małopolskiego z uwzględnieniem podziału na powiaty i gminy. Wojewódzki Konserwator Zabtyków w Krakowie.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prus B., Gawroński K. 2010. Krajobrazy kulturowe a ochrona zabytków. [w:] Planowanie i zagospodarowanie przestrzenne jako instrument kształtowania krajobrazów kulturowych, K. Gawroński, J. Hernik (red.), Wyd. Branta, 222–233.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Salata T., Prus B., Król K. 2012. Opracowanie i zastosowanie nowoczesnego modelu danych przestrzennych dla stworzenia gminnej ewidencji zabytków (Development and implementation of a modern model of spatial data for the creation of municipal records of monuments). Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas. Polish Academy of Science. No 2/I, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sankowski E., Harris B.J., Hernik J., 2016. Some Problems and Possibilities for Sustainable Development, Publishing House of the University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sen A. 2009. The Idea of Justice, Section, “Sustainable Development and the Environment”. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sołtyk K. (eds). 2015. Prawdziwa Polska. The real Poland. Skarby nadwiślańskiej krainy. Marvels from the land of the River Vistula. Multico Oficyna Wydawnicz, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stiglitz J.E. and Greenwald B.C., 2015. Creating a Learning Society-A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress, Reader’s Edition, Columbia University Press, New York, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van der Valk A. 2009. Multiple cultural landscape: research and planning for living heritage in the Netherlands. [In:] Hernik J. (ed.) Cultural Landscape – Across Disciplines, Oficyna Wydawnicza Branta, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waters, R. D., Jones, P. M. (2011). Using video to build an organization’s identity and brand: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ YouTube videos. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 23(3), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2011.594779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wood J., Dykes J., Slingsby A., Clarke K. 2007. Interactive visual exploration of a large spatio-temporal dataset: reflections on a geovisualization mashup. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6), 1176–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Żywicki J. 2010. Officials: architects, builders, civil engineers…Architecture and construction people in the Lublin voivodeship and the Lublin province in the Kingdom of Poland in the years 1815-1915 (Urzędnicy: architekci, budowniczowie, inżynierowie cywilni…Ludzie architektury i budownictwa w województwie lubelskim oraz guberni lubelskiej w Królestwie Polskim w latach 1815–1915). Wyd. UMCS, Lublin.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zeidler K. 2007. Prawo ochrony dziedzictwa kultury. Wyd. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

Legal Acts

  1. Act 1922. Ustawa o zniesieniu Ministerstwa Sztuki i Kultury z dnia 17 lutego 1922, [w:] Dziennik Praw Państwa Polskiego (dalej: DPPP) z 6 marca 1922 r., nr 14, poz. 128, s. 238–239.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Act 2003. Ustawa z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami [Dz.U.10.76.489].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Act 2010. Ustawa z dnia 18 marca 2010 r. o zmianie ustawy o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami oraz o zmianie niektórych innych ustaw [Dz.U.10.75.474].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Decree 1918a. Dekret o opiece nad zabytkami sztuki i kultury z dnia 31 października 1918, [w:] Dziennik Praw Państwa Polskiego (DPPP) z 8 listopada 1918, nr 16, poz. 36, s. 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Decree 1918b. Dekret o utworzeniu Ministerstwa Sztuki i Kultury z 5 grudnia 1918 r., [w:] DPPP z 14 grudnia 1918 r” nr 19, poz. 52, s. 140–141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Regulation 2004. Rozporządzenie Ministra Kultury z dnia 14 maja 2004 r. w sprawie prowadzenia rejestru zabytków, krajowej, wojewódzkiej i gminnej ewidencji zabytków oraz krajowego wykazu zabytków skradzionych lub wywiezionych za granicę niezgodnie z prawem [Dz.U. 11.113.661]

    Google Scholar 

  7. Regulation 1928. Rozporządzenie Prezydenta RP z dnia 6 marca 1928 r. o opiece nad zabytkami, [w:] Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 14 marca 1928 r, nr 29, poz, 265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Land Management and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 253C, 30-149, Kraków, Poland

    Barbara Prus, Karol Król, Krzysztof Gawroński & Józef Hernik

  2. Department of Philosophy, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA

    Edward Sankowski

Authors
  1. Barbara Prus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karol Król
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Krzysztof Gawroński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edward Sankowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Józef Hernik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Józef Hernik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CODATA-Germany, Berlin, Germany

    Horst Kremers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prus, B., Król, K., Gawroński, K., Sankowski, E., Hernik, J. (2020). From Classic (Analogue) to Digital Forms of Cultural Heritage Protection in Poland. In: Kremers, H. (eds) Digital Cultural Heritage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15200-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation