Abstract
The problem of the status of the embryo (fertilized eggs in the test tube) is central when considering genetic and reproductive technology. It is mainly about what is ethically justifiable in experiments with embryos at the earliest stages. However, ownership of the embryo, decisions about donation, and freezing of fertilized eggs are also important problems to discuss. Can embryos and fetal tissue be used for transplantation or in the pharmaceutical industry? The answer to these questions depends on the embryonal ethical and legal status of the embryo. This problem is one of the most controversial bioethical issues in Europe, where for religious and cultural reasons, there is a big difference between the perceptions of the various countries. Rendtorff argues that the embryo must be considered as a “third thing” between people and things. The legal policy discussion on embryo status shows that in the specific legal development, despite major differences between the perceptions of the status of the embryo, a pragmatic consensus on embryonal legal status between persons and things in the European countries can be traced. After having presented the ethical and philosophical issues relevant to embryo experiments and embryo research, he goes on to present a case study of the Danish debate about embryo experiments and embryo research. With this case example, he gives an overview of relevant issues concerning embryo experiments and embryo research in bioethics and biolaw, which concern the legal regulation of bioethical issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
It has become commonplace to describe the fertilized eggs in the test tube as “pre-embryo,” and the discussion in this chapter will be about the legal status of the pre-embryo. In order not to establish an absolute distinction between pre-embryo and embryo, I do not go into this division, but continue to use the term embryo to describe the early human life both before and after the 14-day limit. This concept of pre-embryo has especially gained ground in the Dutch and the English discussion of the status of the embryo. However, one should be cautious in the way that would define itself out of the controversial ethical issues.
References
Arnoux, Irma. 1995. Le droit de l’être humain avant la mort et après la naissance. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
Coughlan, Michael J. 1988. The Vatican, the law and the human embryo. London: Macmillan.
Dunstan, G.R., and Mary J. Seller, eds. 1988. The status of the human embryo. London: King Edward’s Hospital Fund.
Dyson, Anthony, and John Harris. 1990. Experiments on embryos. London: Routledge.
Engelhardt, Tristam. 1986. The foundations of bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eser, Albin. 1988. Rechtsvergleichende Aspekte der Embryonenforschung. In Respekt vor dem werdende Leben: Ein Presseseminar der Max Planck Gesellschaft zum Thema Embryonenforschung. Freiburg: Max Planck Institut für Strafrecht.
Etiske Råd, Denmark. 2001. Etiske problemer vedrørende kunstig befrugtning, 1. del. Ret til børn? Ret til hjælp til at få børn? Redegørelse. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd (The Danish Council of Ethics).
———. 2002. Etiske problemer vedrørende kunstig befrugtning, 2. del. Anonymitet og selektion i forbindelse med sæddontion. Redegørelse. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2003a. Menneskeligt livs begyndelse og fosteranlægs etiske status, Et debatoplæg. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2003b. Etiske problemer vedrørende kunstig befrugtning, 3. del. Mikroinsemination og præimplantationsdiagnostik. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2005a. Etisk Forum for Unge 2005. Den tjekkede tvivl. Om stamceller og etik. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2005b. Conference report and summaries: The ethics of patenting human genes and stem cells. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2010. Etiske aspekter ved nye typer af stamceller og befrugtningsteknikker. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2013a. Det Etiske Råds udtalelse om kompensation for ægdonation. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2013b. International handel med menneskelige æg. In rugemoderskab og organer. En redegørelse fra Det Etiske Råd. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2014. Det Etiske Råds udtalelse om embryo- og dobbeltdonation. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
———. 2015. Udtalelse om opbevaring og brug af befrugtede æg. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
Etiske Råd, Denmark, and Det dyreetiske Råd. 2007. Mand eller mus? Etiske aspekter ved kimæreforskningen. Copenhagen: Det Etiske Råd.
Ford, Norman. 1988. When did I begin? Conception of the human individual in history, philosophy and science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hare, Richard. 1992. Essays in bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, John. 1983. In vitro fertilization: The ethical issues (I). The Philosophical Quarterly 33 (132): 217–237.
———. 1985. The value of life. London: Routledge.
———. 1993. Wonderwoman and Superman, the ethics of human biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemp, Peter, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. 2009. The Barcelona declaration. Towards an integrated approach to basic ethical principles. Synthesis Philosophica 46 (2): 239–251.
Kemp, Peter, Jacob Rendtorff, and Niels Mattsson Johansen, eds. 2000. Bioethics and biolaw. Vol. I–II. Copenhagen: Rhodos International Publishers.
Lebech, Mette, Jacob Rendtorff, and Peter Kemp. 1997. Den bioetiske vending. En grundbog i bioetik. Copenhagen: Spektrum, Gyldendal.
Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl. 1997. Legislation, bioethics, judgement. In Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 19, 211–222. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
———. 1998. The Second International Conference about bioethics and biolaw: European principles in bioethics and biolaw. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (3): 271–274.
———. 1999. Bioetik og ret. Kroppen mellem person og ting. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
———. 2001. Biobanks and the rights to the human body. In The use of human bioBanks, ethical, social, economical and legal aspects, ed. Mats G. Hansson, 5–61. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
———. 2002. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability—Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3): 235–244.
———. 2003. Bioethics in Denmark. In The annals of bioethics. Regional perspectives in bioethics, ed. John F. Peppin and Mark J. Cherry, 209–224. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
———. 2004. Basic ethical principles for a common European culture of science and research. In The common European space of education, science and culture, ed. G.V. Makovich, 151–157. Chelyabinsk: Southern Ural State University.
———. 2008. The limitations and accomplishments of autonomy as a basic principle in bioethics and biolaw. In Autonomy and human rights in health care: An international perspective, ed. David N. Weisstub and Guillermo Díaz Pintos Pintos, vol. 36, 75–87. Doordrecht: Springer.
———. 2011. La notion de vulnérabilité comme principe fondamental dans la bioéthique et dans le biodroit. In Une société de soins: santé travail philosophie politique, ed. Paulette Guinchard and Jean-Francois Petit, 57–61. Ivry-sur-Seine: Les éditions de l’Atelier.
———. 2014. European perspectives. In Handbook of global bioethics, ed. Henk A.M.J. ten Have and Bert Gordijn, 293–310. New York: Springer.
———. 2015. Update of European bioethics: Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Bioethics Update 1 (2): 113–129.
Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl, and Peter Kemp. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw, autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability (Vol. I–II). Barcelona, Copenhagen.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1990. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Le Seuil.
Singer, Peter. 1993. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steinbock, Bonnie. 1992. Life before birth: The moral and legal status of embryos and fetuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Catholic Church. 1997. Congregation for the doctrine of the faith, instruction of respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation. London: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Thévoz, J.M. 1990. Entre nos mains, l’embryon, recherche bioéthique. Geneva: Ed. du Cerf.
Tooley, Michael. 1983. Abortion and Infanticide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trappenburg, Margot. 1993. Soorten van gelijk: Medisch-ethische discussies in Nederland. Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.
van der Burg, Wibren. 1995. Embryo experiments in the Netherlands. In Archiv für Staats- und Rechtsphilosophie.
Warnock, Mary. 1983. In vitro fertilization: The ethical issues (II). The Philosophical Quarterly 33 (132): 238–249.
———. 1995. A question of life: The warnock report on human fertilization and embryology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rendtorff, J.D. (2020). The Status of the Human Embryo: A Case Study of Embryo Experiments and Embryo Research in Denmark. In: Weiberg-Salzmann, M., Willems, U. (eds) Religion and Biopolitics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14580-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14580-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14579-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14580-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)