Skip to main content

Can Technology Make a Difference to the Level of Engagement Within Large Classes in Engineering Education? A Case Study in Sri Lanka

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education (ICL 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 917))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Engineering education is oriented towards problem based and project-based education. In Sri Lanka, teachers of first-year engineering undergraduate courses have the unique challenge of fostering student engagement especially in large classes. This study concerns a large classroom using the Moodle virtual learning environment. Data was collected qualitatively through focus-group discussions with undergraduates with respect to accessing the Moodle Log and quantitatively via the Moodle records. An important finding in this study is that when students are used to traditional teaching methods, they face difficulties in accepting TEL techniques, unless the latter is made compulsory for some aspects. Hence teachers must use a blended-learning approach and gradually increase the use of TEL techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mills, J.E., Treagust, D.: of Engineering based or project-based learning the. Australas. J. Eng. Educ. 3, (2003). ISSN 1324-5821

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newman, M.: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of problem-based learning. Ltsn, pp. 1–74 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clive, D. et al.: Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. J. Eng. Educ. (January), 103–120 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. National, T.H.E., Press, A. : Educating the Engineer of 2020 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neto, P., Williams, B.: More activity, less lectures: A technology stewardship approach applied to undergraduate engineering learning’. In: Proceedings—1st International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education, CISPEE 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ministry of Finance Sri Lanka.: Annual Report, p. 25. (2015). doi: 1.1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell, R., et al.: Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best practice tips. CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 6, 1–15 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Czekanski, A.J., Roux, D.-M.P.: The use of clicker technology to evaluate short and long-term concept retention. 1–12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pritchard, D.: The Use of “Clicker” Technology to Enhance the Teaching/Learning Experience, … /hedc/resources/Digital-Resources-for-your-Teaching …, pp. 1–24 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Felder, R., Silverman, L.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78(June), 674–681 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, K.D.: Technology-enabled active learning environments: an appraisal, CELE exchange. Centre Effective Learn. Environ. (610), 1–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Langan, D., et al.: Students’ use of personal technologies in the university classroom: analysing the perceptions of the digital generation. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 25(1), 101–117 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chokri, B.: Factors influencing the adoption of the e-Learning technology in teaching and learning by students of a university class. European Sci. J. 8(28), 165–190 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boz, B., Adnan, M.: How do freshman engineering students reflect an online calculus course? Int. J. Educ Math. Sci. Technol. (IJEMST), 5(4), 262–278 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.83046

  15. Juniu, S.: Use of technology for constructivist learning in a performance assessment class. Meas. Physical Educ. Exerc. Sci. 10(1) (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkwood, A., Price, L.: Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn. Media Technol. 39(1), 6–36 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support received from the LK Domain Registry in publishing this paper. The conclusions and/or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views of the LK Domain Registry. This study was conducted at University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka and we would like to express our gratitude to all the lecturers, non-academic staff and students those who have involved in this study. We express our special thanks and appreciation to Mr. Sanjaya Sooriyaarchchi, Mr. Shashi N Amarasinghe and all CIT studio staff at the university for recording lectures and uploading to the Moodle.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Peramunugamage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peramunugamage, A., Usoof, H., Dias, P. (2019). Can Technology Make a Difference to the Level of Engagement Within Large Classes in Engineering Education? A Case Study in Sri Lanka. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education. ICL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 917. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11935-5_78

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics