Abstract
Policy discourse analysis (PDA) draws from critical and poststructural theories to provide researchers with an approach to identifying dominant discourses shaping policy problems and solutions. Such analyses reveal how discourse contributes to shaping subject positions, or roles, with implications for practice. This chapter defines PDA, describes the conceptual principles of the approach, and details the research methods for the implementation of a PDA study. Examples of studies employing PDA are shared to illustrate the utility of the approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allan, E. J. (2008). Policy discourses, gender, and education: Constructing women’s status. New York, NY: Routledge.
Allan, E. J. (2010). Feminist poststructuralism meets policy analysis: An overview. In E. J. Allan, S. Iverson, & R. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Reconstructing policy in higher education: Feminist poststructural perspectives (pp. 11–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
Allan, E. J., Gordon, S., & Iverson, S. (2006). Re/thinking practices of power: The discursive framing of leadership in postsecondary education. The Review of Higher Education, 30(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0045
Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, policy, and politics: The construction of policy problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bertrand, M., Perez, W., & Rogers, J. (2015). Unmasking policy insiders’ discourses and discursive in upholding and challenging racism and classism in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(93), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2068
Dirks, D. A. (2016). Transgender people at four Big Ten campuses: A policy discourse analysis. Review of Higher Education, 39(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2016.0020
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Fowler, F. C. (2012). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction. New York, NY: Pearson.
Gildersleeve, R. E., & Hernandez, S. (2012). Producing (im)possible peoples: Policy discourse analysis, in-state resident tuition and undocumented students in American higher education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v14i2.517
Goudas, A. M., & Boylan, H. R. (2012). Addressing flawed research in developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 2–13.
Hinsdale, M. J. (2012). Opportunity reconsidered. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2012-6471
Hoffman, J. (2010). The dilemma of the senior woman administrator role in intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 3(5), 53–75.
Hotchkins, B., & Dancy, E. (2015). Rethinking success: Black male values in higher education. Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men, 4(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.2979/spectrum.4.1.05
Iverson, S. V. (2012). Constructing outsiders: The discursive framing of access in university diversity policies. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0013
Iverson, S. V. (2015). The risky subject: A policy discourse analysis of sexual assault policies in higher education. In S. C. Wooten & R. W. Mitchell (Eds.), The crisis of campus sexual violence: Critical perspectives on prevention and response (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
Larson, T. E., & Lovell, C. D. (2010). The integration of higher education and public policy: A complex and often misunderstood nexus. In C. D. Lovell, T. E. Larson, D. R. Dean, & D. L. Longanecker (Eds.), Public policy and higher education (2nd ed., pp. 3–9). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Marshall, C. (2000). Policy discourse analysis: Negotiating gender equity. Journal of Education Policy, 15(2), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/026809300285863
Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. London, UK: Routledge.
Parker, T. L., & Richardson Jr., R. C. (2005). Ending remediation at CUNY: Implications for access and excellence. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 5(2), 1–22.
Parker, T. L., Barrett, M. S., & Bustillos, L. T. (2014). The state of developmental education: Higher education and public policy priorities. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pillow, W. S. (2004). Unfit subjects: Educational policy and the teen mother. New York, NY: Routledge.
Pillow, W. S. (2006). Teen pregnancy and education politics of knowledge, research, and practice. Educational Policy, 20(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805285289
Soliday, M. (2002). The politics of remediation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
St. Pierre, E. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156422
Suspitsyna, T. (2012). Higher education for economic advancement and engaged citizenship: An analysis of the U.S. Department of Education discourse. Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2012.0003
Tolbert, A. R. (2017). Discourses of developmental English education: Reframing policy debates. Retrieved from: DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2659. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2659
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Suggested Readings
Suggested Readings
-
Allan, E. J. (2010). Feminist poststructuralism meets policy analysis: An overview. In E. J. Allan, S. Iverson, & R. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Reconstructing policy in higher education: Feminist poststructural perspectives (pp. 11–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
This chapter provides a more detailed introduction to the theoretical and conceptual underpinnings helpful to understanding policy as discourse.
-
Dirks, D. A. (2016). Transgender people at four Big Ten campuses: A policy discourse analysis. Review of Higher Education, 39(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2016.0020
This article provides a powerful illustration of a recent PDA study revealing how the policy discourses may actually undermine the outcomes of the policies intended to support trans-individuals.
-
Foucault, M. (2001). From “Truth and Power”. In V. B. Leitch (Ed.), The Norton anthology of theory and criticism (pp. 1667–1670). New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
Though brief, this passage may provide the most critical definition of “power” for poststructuralist thinking. Understanding how power is defined, especially in contrast to Marxian or positivist forms of power, is a conceptual key to poststructuralist work.
-
Gildersleeve, R. E., & Hernandez, S. (2012). Producing (im)possible peoples: Policy discourse analysis, in-state resident tuition and undocumented students in American higher education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v14i2.517
In this study, researchers detail a PDA study of state laws to powerfully illuminate how tuition policy discourses shape understandings of identity relative to undocumented students in US higher education.
-
Iverson, S. V. (2012). Constructing outsiders: The discursive framing of access in university diversity policies. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0013
This article provides a compelling illustration of a PDA study examining diversity action plans at US land-grant universities finding that well-intended policy efforts to enhance diversity and inclusivity may unwittingly reinforce inequitable practices.
-
Mills, S. (2011). Discourse: The new critical idiom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
This text provides a helpful introduction to the term “discourse” and how the term is used in the many varied sub-fields within scholarly work. The text introduces the history and language of debates and development of the idea of discourse for an audience not familiar or acquainted with the birth of the study of semiotics and structuralism under Saussure and Lacan. It also helps distinguish some of the fault lines between critical and poststructural thinking on discourse.
-
van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
While vast in its scope, and more focused on critical discourse analysis rather than policy discourse analysis, this text is a series of collected essays that provides multiple competing and interwoven definitions of power and discourse. It also includes relevant examples of the applications of discourse theory in research.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allan, E.J., Tolbert, A.R. (2019). Advancing Social Justice with Policy Discourse Analysis. In: Strunk, K.K., Locke, L.A. (eds) Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05899-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05900-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)