Skip to main content

Advancing Social Justice with Policy Discourse Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education

Abstract

Policy discourse analysis (PDA) draws from critical and poststructural theories to provide researchers with an approach to identifying dominant discourses shaping policy problems and solutions. Such analyses reveal how discourse contributes to shaping subject positions, or roles, with implications for practice. This chapter defines PDA, describes the conceptual principles of the approach, and details the research methods for the implementation of a PDA study. Examples of studies employing PDA are shared to illustrate the utility of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allan, E. J. (2008). Policy discourses, gender, and education: Constructing women’s status. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, E. J. (2010). Feminist poststructuralism meets policy analysis: An overview. In E. J. Allan, S. Iverson, & R. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Reconstructing policy in higher education: Feminist poststructural perspectives (pp. 11–35). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, E. J., Gordon, S., & Iverson, S. (2006). Re/thinking practices of power: The discursive framing of leadership in postsecondary education. The Review of Higher Education, 30(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, policy, and politics: The construction of policy problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., Perez, W., & Rogers, J. (2015). Unmasking policy insiders’ discourses and discursive in upholding and challenging racism and classism in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(93), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, D. A. (2016). Transgender people at four Big Ten campuses: A policy discourse analysis. Review of Higher Education, 39(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2016.0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. C. (2012). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction. New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildersleeve, R. E., & Hernandez, S. (2012). Producing (im)possible peoples: Policy discourse analysis, in-state resident tuition and undocumented students in American higher education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v14i2.517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudas, A. M., & Boylan, H. R. (2012). Addressing flawed research in developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsdale, M. J. (2012). Opportunity reconsidered. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2012-6471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. (2010). The dilemma of the senior woman administrator role in intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 3(5), 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotchkins, B., & Dancy, E. (2015). Rethinking success: Black male values in higher education. Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men, 4(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.2979/spectrum.4.1.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, S. V. (2012). Constructing outsiders: The discursive framing of access in university diversity policies. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, S. V. (2015). The risky subject: A policy discourse analysis of sexual assault policies in higher education. In S. C. Wooten & R. W. Mitchell (Eds.), The crisis of campus sexual violence: Critical perspectives on prevention and response (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, T. E., & Lovell, C. D. (2010). The integration of higher education and public policy: A complex and often misunderstood nexus. In C. D. Lovell, T. E. Larson, D. R. Dean, & D. L. Longanecker (Eds.), Public policy and higher education (2nd ed., pp. 3–9). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. (2000). Policy discourse analysis: Negotiating gender equity. Journal of Education Policy, 15(2), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/026809300285863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, T. L., & Richardson Jr., R. C. (2005). Ending remediation at CUNY: Implications for access and excellence. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 5(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, T. L., Barrett, M. S., & Bustillos, L. T. (2014). The state of developmental education: Higher education and public policy priorities. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pillow, W. S. (2004). Unfit subjects: Educational policy and the teen mother. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pillow, W. S. (2006). Teen pregnancy and education politics of knowledge, research, and practice. Educational Policy, 20(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805285289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliday, M. (2002). The politics of remediation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suspitsyna, T. (2012). Higher education for economic advancement and engaged citizenship: An analysis of the U.S. Department of Education discourse. Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2012.0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, A. R. (2017). Discourses of developmental English education: Reframing policy debates. Retrieved from: DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2659. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2659

  • van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth J. Allan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Suggested Readings

Suggested Readings

  • Allan, E. J. (2010). Feminist poststructuralism meets policy analysis: An overview. In E. J. Allan, S. Iverson, & R. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Reconstructing policy in higher education: Feminist poststructural perspectives (pp. 11–35). New York, NY: Routledge.

This chapter provides a more detailed introduction to the theoretical and conceptual underpinnings helpful to understanding policy as discourse.

This article provides a powerful illustration of a recent PDA study revealing how the policy discourses may actually undermine the outcomes of the policies intended to support trans-individuals.

  • Foucault, M. (2001). From “Truth and Power”. In V. B. Leitch (Ed.), The Norton anthology of theory and criticism (pp. 1667–1670). New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.

Though brief, this passage may provide the most critical definition of “power” for poststructuralist thinking. Understanding how power is defined, especially in contrast to Marxian or positivist forms of power, is a conceptual key to poststructuralist work.

  • Gildersleeve, R. E., & Hernandez, S. (2012). Producing (im)possible peoples: Policy discourse analysis, in-state resident tuition and undocumented students in American higher education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v14i2.517

In this study, researchers detail a PDA study of state laws to powerfully illuminate how tuition policy discourses shape understandings of identity relative to undocumented students in US higher education.

  • Iverson, S. V. (2012). Constructing outsiders: The discursive framing of access in university diversity policies. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0013

This article provides a compelling illustration of a PDA study examining diversity action plans at US land-grant universities finding that well-intended policy efforts to enhance diversity and inclusivity may unwittingly reinforce inequitable practices.

  • Mills, S. (2011). Discourse: The new critical idiom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

This text provides a helpful introduction to the term “discourse” and how the term is used in the many varied sub-fields within scholarly work. The text introduces the history and language of debates and development of the idea of discourse for an audience not familiar or acquainted with the birth of the study of semiotics and structuralism under Saussure and Lacan. It also helps distinguish some of the fault lines between critical and poststructural thinking on discourse.

  • van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

While vast in its scope, and more focused on critical discourse analysis rather than policy discourse analysis, this text is a series of collected essays that provides multiple competing and interwoven definitions of power and discourse. It also includes relevant examples of the applications of discourse theory in research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Allan, E.J., Tolbert, A.R. (2019). Advancing Social Justice with Policy Discourse Analysis. In: Strunk, K.K., Locke, L.A. (eds) Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05899-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05900-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics