Skip to main content

Exploring the Effect of Experience on Team Behavior: A Computational Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Computing and Cognition '18 (DCC 2018)

Abstract

The paper presents the results of research aimed at contributing to a better understanding of the effect of team experience and learning on the performance of a design team. An agent-based model of the design team was developed, and computational simulations were utilized to study how agent’s knowledge changes by its use and what are the effects of such changes on the team behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gero JS, Peng W (2009) Understanding behaviours of a constructive memory agent: a markov chain analysis. Knowl-Based Syst 22:610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Light B, Butterworth G (2016) Context and cognition: ways of learning and knowing. Routlege, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2004) The situated function-behavior-structure framework. Des Stud 25(4):373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kannengiesser U, Gero JS (2012) A process framework of affordances in design. Des Issues 28:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gero JS, Fujii H (2000) A computational framework for concept formation in a situated design agent. Knowl-Based Syst 13(6):361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher ML, Gero JS (2002) Agent models of 3D virtual worlds. In: ACADIA 2002: thresholds, pp 127–138. California State Polytechnic University, Pamona

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, NY

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gero JS (2017) Whither design theory and methods? Back to the future: the next 50 years, ANZAScA, pp 563–572

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sivasubramaniam N, Liebowitz SJ, Lackman CL (2012) Determinants of new product development team performance: a meta-analytic review. J Prod Innov Manag 29:803–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbonell P, Rodriguez AI (2006) Designing teams for speedy product development: the moderating effect of technological complexity. J Bus Res 59:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akgun AE, Lynn GS (2002) Antecedents and consequences of learning in new product development teams. J Eng Technol Manage 5:57–72

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gruenfeld DH, Fan ET (1999) What newcomers see and what oldtimers say: discontinuities in knowledge exchange. In: Shared cognition in organizations: the management of knowledge, pp 245–268. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levine JM, Moreland RL (1999) Knowledge transmission in work groups: helping newcomers succeed. In: Shared cognition in organizations: the management of knowledge, pp 267–296. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choi HS, Thomson L (2005) Old wine in a new bottle: impact of membership change on group creativity. Organ Behav Hum Dec 98:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson CB, Gibbs CL (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effect of geographic dispersion, electronic dependance, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin Sci Quart 51:451–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirst G (2009) Effects of membership change on open discussion and team performance: the moderating role of team tenure. EJWOP 18:231–249

    Google Scholar 

  17. Badke-Schaub P, Neumann A, Lauche K, Mohammed S (2007) Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign 3:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McComb C, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2015) Lifting the veil: drawing insights about design teams from a cognitively-inspired computational model. Des Stud 40:119–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ambler NP (2015) Design in the modern age: investigating the role of complexity on the performance of collaborative engineering design teams. Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

    Google Scholar 

  20. Singh V, Dong A, Gero JS (2013) Social learning in design teams: the importance of direct and indirect communications. AIEDAM 27:167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kannengiesser U, Gero JS (2004) Modelling expertise of temporary design teams. J Des Res 4:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sosa R, Gero JS (2013) The creative values of bad ideas. Proc CAADRIA 2013:853–862

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van den Bossche P, Gijselaers W, Segers M, Woltjer G, Kirschner P (2011) Team learning: building shared mental models. Instr Sci 29:283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Perisic MM, Storga M, Gero JS (2017) Building a computational laboratory for the study of team behaviour in product development. Proc ICED’17 8:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carley K, Gasser L (1999) Computational organization theory, multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 299–330

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson EG, Lewis K (2014) A dynamic model of individual and collaborative learning amid disruption. Organ Sci 25:356–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper reports on work funded by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia, and Croatian Science Foundation MInMED project (www.minmed.org). This research is supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation to the third author under Grant CMMI‐1400466. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marija Majda Perišić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perišić, M.M., Štorga, M., Gero, J.S. (2019). Exploring the Effect of Experience on Team Behavior: A Computational Approach. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '18. DCC 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05362-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05363-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics