Skip to main content

Addressing the Kurdish Self-Determination Conflict: Democratic Autonomy and Authoritarianism in Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democratic Representation in Plurinational States

Part of the book series: Comparative Territorial Politics ((COMPTPOL))

Abstract

This article examines the concepts of “democratic confederalism” and “democratic autonomy” as developed by the mainstream Kurdish movement in Turkey. It primarily focuses on the type of self-government these concepts envision, and questions to what extent they can contribute to the resolution of the Kurdish conflict. While the concept of “democratic confederalism” acts as the key theoretical framework for the resolution of the Kurdish conflict, democratic autonomy functions as its modus operandi. The latter presents itself as a non-secessionist understanding of self-determination and thus as a mechanism for conflict transformation, which aims to achieve the democratic reconstruction of Turkey by establishing self-governing bodies in the Kurdish region and throughout the country. As such it entails elements of territorial and non-territorial self-government and shares some insights and features with the concept of National Cultural Autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akkaya, A. H., & Jongerden, J. (2012). Reassembling the Political: The PKK and the Project of Radical Democracy. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 14, 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktoprak, E. (2012). The Kurdish Opening and the Constitutional Reform: Is There Any Progress? European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 9, 643–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkey, K. (2008). Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barkey, H. (2017). The Transformation of Turkey’s Kurdish Question. In G. Stansfield, et al. (Eds.), The Kurdish Question Revisited (pp. 211–224). London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R. (2005). Political Autonomy or Cultural Minority Rights? A Conceptual Critique of Renner’s Model. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics (pp. 83–95). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, O. (2000 [1907]). The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayır, D. (2013). Turkey, the Kurds, and the Legal Contours of the Right to Self-Determination. Kurdish Studies, 1(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengio, O. (2017). Separated but Not Connected. The Synergic Effects in the Kurdish Sub-system. In G. Stansfield, et al. (Eds.), The Kurdish Question Revisited (pp. 77–91). London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezwan, N. (2008). Türkei und Europa. Die Staatsdoktrin der Türkischen Republik, ihre Aufnahme in die EU and die kurdische Nationalfrage. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezwan, N. (2016). Sykes-Picot Paylaşım Antlaşması ve Kurdistan. In A. Karakaş, et al. (Eds.), Bitmeyen Savaş Paylaşılmayan Ortadoğu (pp. 136–153). İstanbul: Evrensel Yayım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarslan, H. (2008). The Kurds and the Turkish State. In R. Kasaba (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Turkey: Turkey in the Modern World (Vol. 4, pp. 33–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilmayer, L. (1991). Secession and Self-Determination. A Territorial Interpretation. Yale Journal of International Law, 16, 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity Without Groups. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (2003). Democracy and Secession. In M. Moore (Ed.), National Self-Determination and Secession (pp. 14–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., et al. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. A. (2017). False Dawn: Protest, Democracy, and Violence in the New Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C. (2002). The Political Geography of Kurdistan. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 43(4), 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission). (2017). Turkey Opinion on the Amendments to the Constitution adopted by the Grand National Assembly on 12 January 2017 and to be submitted to a National Referendum 16 April 2017 adopted by the Venice Commission on its 110th Plenary Session Venice, 10–11 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, M. M. (2017). Contrasting Turkish Paradigms Toward the Volatile Kurdish Question: Domestic Consideration and Foreign Considerations. In G. Stansfeld & M. Shareef (Eds.), Kurdish Question Revisited (pp. 225–243). London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongerden, J. (2017). The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK): The Radical Democracy and the Right to Self-Determination Beyond the Nation-State. In G. Stansfield, et al. (Eds.), The Kurdish Question Revisited (pp. 245–257). London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2003). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2005). Renner and the Accommodation of Sub-state Nationalism. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics (pp. 117–126). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leezenberg, M. (2016). The Ambiguities of Democratic Autonomy: The Kurdish Movement in Turkey and Rojava. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 671–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, D. (2017). A Modern History of the Kurds. London: I. B. Tauris Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, J. (2010). Ethnic Domination in Democracies. In M. Weller, et al. (Eds.), Political Participation of Minorities: A Commentary on International Standards and Practice (pp. 35–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, J., & Moore, M. (2005). Karl Renner, Power Sharing and Non-territorial Autonomy. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics (pp. 64–81). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimni, E. (2000). Introduction for the English Reading-Audience. In Otto Bauer’s The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy (pp. xv–xlv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimni, E. (2005). National Cultural Autonomy Model Revisited. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics (pp. 1–12). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2017). Report on the Human Rights Situation on South–East Turkey. July 2015 to December 2016. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, M. T. (2004). Trapped Between the Map and Reality. In Geography and Perceptions of Kurdistan. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öcalan, A. (2017). The Political Thought of Abdullah Öcalan: Kurdistan, Woman’s Revolution and Democratic Confederalism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B., et al. (2017). Fields Note: On the Independence Referendum in the Kurdish Region of Iraq and Disputed Territories in 2017. Kurdish Studies, 5(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D. (1995). In Defense of Self-Determination. Ethics, 105(2), 352–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, D. L. (2015). The Kurdish Spring: A New Map of the Middle East. London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, K. (2005 [1899]). State and Nation. In E. Nimni (Ed.). National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics (pp. 13–40). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taş, L. (2014). The Myth of the Ottoman Millet System: Its Treatment of Kurds and a Discussion of Territorial and Non-territorial Autonomy. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 21, 497–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Üngör, U. U. (2012). The Making of Modern Turkey. Nation and State in Eastern Anatolia, 1913–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bruinessen, M. (1992). Agha, Shaikh and State: The Social and Political Structure of Kurdistan. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. (2008). Escaping the Self-Determination Trap. Leiden-Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M., et al. (2008). Settling Self-Determination Conflicts. In Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice (pp. xi–xvii). Leiden-Boston: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadirgi, V. (2017). The Political Economy of the Kurds of Turkey: From the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeğen, M. S. (2011). The Kurdish Question in Turkey, Denial to Recognition. In M. Casier, et al. (Eds.), Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bezwan, N. (2018). Addressing the Kurdish Self-Determination Conflict: Democratic Autonomy and Authoritarianism in Turkey. In: Nimni, E., Aktoprak, E. (eds) Democratic Representation in Plurinational States. Comparative Territorial Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01108-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics