Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility in Visegrad Countries (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary) Overall Landscape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to outline the context of CSR activities also in a geographic outline. The location and clustering of CSR issues gives the basis for comparison, benchmarking and empowerment to refer to a broader perspective. This chapter is a bridge between CSR knowledge and practice in Poland and the regional context within the Visegrad Group.

It is obvious that the socio-cultural, historical and economic backgrounds of the societies in this region differ from each other. But despite this variability there seems to be a consensus that, for analytical reasons, clustering CSR practices in the four Visegrad Countries (V4), against the wider—European or global context—is completely understandable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angyal, Á. (2009). Vállalatok társadalmi felelőssége, felelős társaságirányítás [Corporate social responsibility]. Budapest: Kossuth Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, D. (2017). Implicit és explicit, valamint belső és külső CSR egy kettős függésben lévő piacgazdaságban (PhD Thesis). Budapest: Corvinus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, A. (2017). A stratégiai CSR személyiségi gyökerei. In Á. Csiszárik-Kocsir (Ed.), Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században: VII. tanulmánykötet (pp. 55–69). Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem Keleti Károly Gazdasági Kar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čanik, P. (2007). Kde začíná a končí společenská odpovědnost firem? Accessed March 15, 2016, from http://www.canik.cz/2007/09/18/kde-zacina-a-konci-spolecenska-odpovednost-firem

  • Carroll, A. (1979). A three dimensional model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csillag, S. (2008). Vállalatok társadalmi felelőssége és a versenyképesség. Versenyképesség kutatások műhelytanulmány-sorozat. Budapest: BCE Világgazdaságtan Intézet Versenyképesség Kutató Központ.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSR Managers Survey in Central Europe. (2015). How CSR has influenced Central European societies and economies? Lessons learnt and future trends. Accessed June 28, 2017, from https://www2.deloitte.com/csr-managers-survey-in-central-europe-2015.html

  • CMKOS. (2017). Czech-Moravian confederation of trade unions. https://www.cmkos.cz/obsah/330/documents/14982?language=en

  • European Commission. (2001). Green Paper promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Accessed April 12, 2017, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/committees/deve/20020122/com(2001)366_en.pdf

  • European Commission. (2007). The European alliance for CSR progress review 2007 making Europe a pole of excellence on CSR. https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2008-00311-E.pdf

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility Brussels. COM/2011/681.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOCUS. (2010, October). A guide to CSR in Europe: Country insights by CSR Europe’s national partner organisations. CSR Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Formánková, S., & Mikusová, J. (2014). Companies” decision making about CSR. In New trends in management in the 21st century. Czestochowa: Sekcja Wydawnictw Wydzialu Zarzadzania Politechniki Czestochowskiej.

    Google Scholar 

  • GFKCzech. (2010). http://www.gfk.cz/public_relations/press/press_articles/006700/index.cz.html

  • GKI. (2011). A társadalmi felelősségvállalás szerepe és szintje a hazai vállalkozások körében.

    Google Scholar 

  • GKI Economic Research Co. (2008, March). Monthly business survey. Accessed April 20, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • GKI Economic Research Co. (2009, March) Monthly business survey. Accessed, April 20, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Competitiveness Report. (2017). Accessed June 28, 2017, from http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report

  • Global Reporting Initiative. (2015). Sustainability and reporting trends 2025. In: Global reporting initiative. Accessed May 19, 2016, from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Sustainability-and-Reporting-Trends-in-2025-1.pdf

  • Goodpaster, K. E. (2006). Conscience and corporate culture. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Győri, Z. (2010). CSR-on innen és túl. Doktori (PhD) értekezés. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Gazdálkodástani Doktori Iskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hąbek, P. (2017). CSR reporting practices in Visegrad Group countries and the quality of disclosure. Sustainability, 9(12), 2322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humieres, P., & Chauveau, A. (2001). Les Pionniers de l’entreprise responsable, Editions d’Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hupková, D., Bielik, P., & Turčeková, N. (2009). Structural changes in the beef meat demand in Slovakia and demand elasticity estimation. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 55, 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaďuďová, J. (2013). Perception of corporate social responsibility in selected sector of national economy of the Slovak Republic. Electronic International Interdisciplinary Conference, 2, 339–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Statement of the Visegrad Group and Croatia. (2018). http://www.kormany.hu

  • Káposzta, J., & Nagy, H. (2015). Status report about the progress of the Visegrad countries in relation to Europe 2020 targets. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kašparová, K. (2006). Stakeholderská teórie a její propojení s CSR. Accessed August 26, 2017, from http://www.csronline.cz/Page.aspx?publikace

  • Kasparová, K., & Kunz, V. (2013). Moderní přístupy ke společenské odpovědnosti firem a CSR reportování. Praha: GRADA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kita, J. (2005). Marketing 3. prepracované a doplnené vydanie (p. 432). Bratislava: Ekonóm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konya, I. (2018). Economic growth in small open economies lessons from the Visegrad countries. Cham: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lentner, C., Tatay, T., Szegedi, K., & Chauduri, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the banking sector. Firma i Rynek, 51(1), 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorinczy, M., & Formánková, S. (2015). Business ethics and CSR in pharmaceutical industry in the Czech Republic and Hungary? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563062011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lőrinczy, M., Sroka, W., Jankal, R., Hittmár, S., & Szántó, R. (2015). Trends of business ethics and corporate social responsibility in Central Europe. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Málovics, G. (2011). A vállalati fenntarthatóság értelmezéséről Szeged. Szeged: JATEPress Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazurkiewicz, P., Crown, R., & Bartelli, V. (2007). What does business think about corporate social responsibility? A comparison of attitudes and practices in Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merhaut, M. (2013). Etika jako součást společenské odpovědnosti firem hotelového průmyslu. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molendowski, E. (2017). An internationally competitive economy: A comparison of Poland and the Visegrad Group countries in the post-accession period. Comparative Economic Research, 20(4), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molendowski, E., & Żmuda, M. (2011). Changes in competitiveness among the Visegrad countries after accession to the European Union: A comparative analysis based on a generalized double diamond model. Comparative Economic Research, 16(4), 121–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravčíková, K. (2016). Corporate social responsibility of the Slovak agro-food enterprises in the competitive environment. Nitra: Dissertation, Slovak University of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, M., & Bělčik, M. (2010). Společenská odpovědnost organizace: CSR v praxi a jak s ním dál. Praha: Grada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piasecki, R., & Gudowski, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility: The challenges and constraints. Comparative Economic Research, 20(4), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popowska, M. (2015). Europe, between mandatory and voluntary approach to CSR: Some new evidence from the Polish listed companies. Journal of Yaşar University, 10, 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., Scott, T., & Green, M. (2017). Social progress index. http://www.socialprogressindex.com

  • Prokeinová, R., & Paluchová, J. (2012). Social responsibility of food companies in Slovakia – A selected tool of sustainability. Annals of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 99(3), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šarkanová, B., & Krištofík, P. (2018). Innovation through treasury centralization: The potential of the Visegrad countries for establishment of corporate treasury centres. In A. Dias, B. Salmelin, D. Pereira, & M. S. Dias (Eds.), Modeling innovation sustainability and technologies. Economic and policy perspectives. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, J. P., Sobczak, A., & Triomphe, C. A. (2003). Corporate social responsibility and working conditions. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonyi, A. (1999). Labour and social welfare in competitive firms. In C. Makó & C. Warhurst (Eds.), The management and organization of firm in the global context. Budapest: University of Gödöllő.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skácelík, P. (2010). Společenská odpovědnost organizací. Praha: Grada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowron-Grabowska, B., Tomski, P., Dunay, A., & Illés, B. C. (2016). Multidimensionality of decision-making of corporate social responsibility in the strategy of enterprises. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej Zarządzanie, 24(2), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szegedi, K., & Mélypataki, G. (2016). A vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállalás (CSR) és a jog kapcsolata. Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 11(1), 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szlávik, J. (2009). A vállalatok társadalmi felelősségvállalása. Budapest: Complex Kiadó Kft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szuchy, R. (2013). A gazdasági társaságok társadalmi felelősségvállalása. In Magyar Tudomány Napja a Délvidéken. Vajdasági: Vajdasági Magyarok Tudományos Társasága. http://www.vmtt.org.rs/mtn2013/287_304_Szuchy_A.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardos, K. (2014). Esélyegyenlőség és családbarát vállalati gyakorlatok. Budapest: mtd Tanácsadói Közösség MTA Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont Szociológiai Intézet.

    Google Scholar 

  • The V4 is interested in an economically stabile EU. (2018, February 8). The V4 connect. http://v4.gov.hu/the-v4-isinterested-in-an-economically-stabile-eu

  • Ubrežiová, A., & Horská, E. (2011). Perception and approach towards corporate social responsibility in SMEs: Case study of Slovak and Czech Republic. Brno: European Scientific Conference of Ph.D. Students.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubrežiová, I., Stankovič, L., Mihalčová, B., & Ubrežiová, A. (2013). Perception of corporate social responsibility in companies of Eastern Slovakia region in 2009 and 2010. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7), 2903–2910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Válová, A., & Formánková, S. (2014). Corporate philanthropy in the Czech Republic. In 17th international conference enterprise and competitive environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veber, J. (2011). Management Základy – moderní manažerské přístupy – výkonnost a prosperita. Praha: Management Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2016). Future trends in CSR. Waynevisser. Accessed May 21, 2016, from http://www.waynevisser.com/articles/fu-ture-trends-in-csr

  • Zadek, S. (2001). Third generation corporate citizenship – Public policy and business in society. London: The Foreign Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysk, W. (2017). Trends in the area of responsibility and justice in the activities of enterprises. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on innovation management, entrepreneurship and sustainability. Prague: IMES.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Przytuła, S., Formánková, S., Ubrežiová, I., Dunay, A. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility in Visegrad Countries (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary) Overall Landscape. In: Długopolska-Mikonowicz, A., Przytuła, S., Stehr, C. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00440-8_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics