Skip to main content

Determination of IUP Based on Susceptibility for Degradation by Default

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 895))

Abstract

Intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) like the structured proteins are subjected to proteasomal degradation. However, unlike the structured ones, there is no crucial need of protein unfolding step to access the IUPs to the 20S catalytic subunit of the proteasome. This distinctive behavior set the stage for operational definition of the IUPs based on their susceptibility to the 20S degradation in a cell free system. Numerous studies revealed that this is the case in the cells as well, although no comprehensive analysis was performed to date. IUPs are degraded by the 20S proteasome subunit by default, without being polyubiquitinated or undergoing any other modifications. IUPs escape the process of degradation by default by a number of mechanisms, of which a more general one is interaction with a partner named nanny. Based on these attributes one can define IUP by conducting a set of cell free and cell culture experiments as outlined in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL (1996) Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem 65:801–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Glickman MH, Ciechanover A (2002) The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev 82:373–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Asher G, Reuven N, Shaul Y (2006) 20S proteasomes and protein degradation “by default”. Bioessays 28:844–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsvetkov P, Asher G, Paz A, Reuven N, Sussman JL, Silman I, Shaul Y (2008) Operational definition of intrinsically unstructured protein sequences based on susceptibility to the 20S proteasome. Proteins 70:1357–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsvetkov P, Reuven N, Shaul Y (2009) The nanny model for IDPs. Nat Chem Biol 5:778–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsvetkov P, Reuven N, Prives C, Shaul Y (2009) Susceptibility of p53 unstructured N terminus to 20S proteasomal degradation programs the stress response. J Biol Chem 284:26234–26242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dosztanyi Z, Tompa P (2008) Prediction of protein disorder. Methods Mol Biol 426:103–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jariel-Encontre I, Bossis G, Piechaczyk M (2008) Ubiquitin-independent degradation of proteins by the proteasome. Biochim Biophys Acta 1786:153–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Forsthoefel AM, Pena MM, Xing YY, Rafique Z, Berger FG (2004) Structural determinants for the intracellular degradation of human thymidylate synthase. Biochemistry 43:1972–1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart DP, Koss B, Bathina M, Perciavalle RM, Bisanz K, Opferman JT (2010) Ubiquitin-independent degradation of antiapoptotic MCL-1. Mol Cell Biol 30:3099–3110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bossis G, Ferrara P, Acquaviva C, Jariel-Encontre I, Piechaczyk M (2003) c-Fos proto-oncoprotein is degraded by the proteasome independently of its own ubiquitinylation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 23:7425–7436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian SB, Princiotta MF, Bennink JR, Yewdell JW (2006) Characterization of rapidly degraded polypeptides in mammalian cells reveals a novel layer of nascent protein quality control. J Biol Chem 281:392–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schubert U, Anton LC, Gibbs J, Norbury CC, Yewdell JW, Bennink JR (2000) Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature 404:770–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowdary DR, Dermody JJ, Jha KK, Ozer HL (1994) Accumulation of p53 in a mutant cell line defective in the ubiquitin pathway. Mol Cell Biol 14:1997–2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elsasser S, Schmidt M, Finley D (2005) Characterization of the proteasome using native gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 398:353–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ciechanover A, Ben-Saadon R (2004) N-terminal ubiquitination: more protein substrates join in. Trends Cell Biol 14:103–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosef Shaul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Tsvetkov, P., Shaul, Y. (2012). Determination of IUP Based on Susceptibility for Degradation by Default. In: Uversky, V., Dunker, A. (eds) Intrinsically Disordered Protein Analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 895. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-927-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-927-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-926-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-927-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics