Abstract
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is considered the gold standard for molecular DNA quantification and can be used for a wide range of techniques from comparing gene expression levels to quantifying DNA copy number variation. The strengths of this assay include sensitivity to a wide range of expression levels, low starting template requirement, which is important when samples are scarce, and quick turnaround time. However, there are many variables to consider when performing qPCR: including (1) starting materials (e.g., tissues, cells, or genomic DNA), (2) fluorescent detection (e.g., SYBR green dye, fluorescent probes, or multiplexed assays), and (3) analysis methods (e.g., simple equations with single reference genes or complex algorithms with multiple reference genes). This chapter will introduce the process of designing an experiment while avoiding common mistakes and present tools for performing qPCR in a practical, simple, and efficient manner.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Peirson SN, Butler JN (2007) Quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol Biol 362:349–362
Bustin SA (2000) Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol 25:169–193
Qiao Y, Liu X, Harvard C, Nolin SL, Brown WT, Koochek M, Holden JJ, Lewis ME, Rajcan-Separovic E (2007) Large-scale copy number variants (CNVs): distribution in normal subjects and FISH/real-time qPCR analysis. BMC Genomics 8:167
Ginzinger DG (2002) Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp Hematol 30:503–512
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25:402–408
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622
Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3:1101–1108
Schmittgen TD, Zakrajsek BA (2000) Effect of experimental treatment on housekeeping gene expression: validation by real-time, quantitative RT-PCR. J Biochem Biophys Methods 46:69–81
Nolan T, Hands RE, Bustin SA (2006) Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat Protoc 1:1559–1582
Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0034
Mygind T, Birkelund S, Birkebaek NH, Østergaard L, Jensen JS, Christiansen G (2002) Determination of PCR efficiency in chelex-100 purified clinical samples and comparison of real-time quantitative PCR and conventional PCR for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae. BMC Microbiol 2:17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Yeatts, K. (2011). Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Using the Comparative C q Method. In: DiStefano, J. (eds) Disease Gene Identification. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 700. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-954-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-954-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-953-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-61737-954-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols