Skip to main content

Creation of a New Prospective Research Biobank: The Example of HUNT3

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Methods in Biobanking

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 675))

Abstract

When establishing a biobank, there are a number of issues to consider with significant impact on the outcome of your efforts and the quality of your work. Some of the most relevant are: (1) study design, (2) the size and composition of your cohort, (3) the nature and desired quality of the biological material, and (4) how to handle, store, and retrieve your samples to maintain the best quality for future analyses.

In this chapter, we in particular describe the organisation of biobanks derived from population-based prospective health surveys illustrated by the Norwegian HUNT study as a basis for more general considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Holmen J, Forsen L, Hjort PF, Midthjell K, Waaler HT and Bjorndal A. (1991) Detecting hypertension: screening versus case finding in Norway. BMJ 302(6770), 219–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Midthjell K, Bjorndal A, Holmen J, Kruger O and Bjartveit K. (1995) Prevalence of known and previously unknown diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in an adult Norwegian population. Indications of an increasing diabetes prevalence. The Nord-Trondelag Diabetes Study. Scand J Prim Health Care 13(3), 229–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmen J et al. (2003) The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995–97 (HUNT 2). Nor Epidemiol 33, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Potter JD. (2004) Toward the last cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(6), 895–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson DB. (2004) An incidence density sampling program for nested case-control analyses. Occup Environ Med 61(12), e59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekman A and Litton JE. (2007) New times, new needs; e-epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 22(5), 285–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekman A, Klint A, Dickman PW, Adami HO and Litton JE. (2007) Optimizing the design of web-based questionnaires – experience from a population-based study among 50,000 women. Eur J Epidemiol 22(5), 293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman A, Dickman PW, Klint A, Weiderpass E and Litton JE. (2006) Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol 21(2), 103–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tranoy KE. (1993) Research ethics: a European perspective. Bull Med Ethics 92, 28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Winickoff DE and Winickoff RN. (2003) The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. N Engl J Med 349(12), 1180–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindmo T, Hveem K et al. (2004) Health Surveys and Biobanking. A Foresight Analysis towards 2020 Report.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Landi MT and Caporaso N. (1997) Sample collection, processing and storage. IARC Sci Publ 142, 223–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ollier W, Sprosen T and Peakman T. (2005) UK Biobank: from concept to reality. Pharmacogenomics 6, 639–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. UK Biobank: protocol for a large-scale prospective epidemiological resource. (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chanock SJ, Manolio T, Boehnke M, Boerwinkle E, Hunter DJ, Thomas G et al. (2007) Replicating genotype-phenotype associations. Nature 447(7145), 655–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hattersley AT and McCarthy MI. (2005) What makes a good genetic association study? Lancet 366(9493), 1315–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Valeri CR, Srey R, Lane JP and Ragno G. (2003) Effect of WBC reduction and storage temperature on PLTs frozen with 6 percent DMSO for as long as 3 years. Transfusion 43(8), 1162–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berz D, McCormack EM, Winer ES, Colvin GA and Quesenberry PJ. (2007) Cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells. Am J Hematol 82(6), 463–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Burke W, Bowen S and Zimmern R. (2007) Will genomics widen or help heal the schism between medicine and public health? Am J Prev Med 33(4), 310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Hveem, K. (2011). Creation of a New Prospective Research Biobank: The Example of HUNT3. In: Dillner, J. (eds) Methods in Biobanking. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 675. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-995-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-423-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics