Abstract
In vitro tests of cancer cell invasion are the “first line” tools of preclinical researchers for screening the multitude of chemical compounds or cell perturbations that may aid in halting or treating cancer malignancy. In order to have predictive value or to contribute to designing personalized treatment regimes, these tests need to take into account the cancer cell environment and measure effects on invasion in sufficient detail. The in vitro invasion assays presented here are a trade-off between feasibility in a multisample format and mimicking the complexity of the tumor microenvironment. They allow testing multiple samples and conditions in parallel using 3D-matrix-embedded cells and deal with the heterogeneous behavior of an invading cell population in time. We describe the steps to take, the technical problems to tackle and useful software tools for the entire workflow: from the experimental setup to the quantification of the invasive capacity of the cells. The protocol is intended to guide researchers to standardize experimental set-ups and to annotate their invasion experiments in sufficient detail. In addition, it provides options for image processing and a solution for storage, visualization, quantitative analysis, and multisample comparison of acquired cell invasion data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clark AG, Vignjevic DM (2015) Modes of cancer cell invasion and the role of the microenvironment. Curr Opin Cell Biol 36:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2015.06.004
Kramer N, Walzl A, Unger C, Rosner M, Krupitza G, Hengstschläger M, Dolznig H (2013) In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. Mutat Res 752:10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.08.001
Masuzzo P, Van Troys M, Ampe C, Martens L (2016) Taking aim at moving targets in computational cell migration. Trends Cell Biol 26:88–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.09.003
Nath S, Devi GR (2016) Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: focus on tumor spheroid model. Pharmacol Ther 163:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.03.013
Fayzullin A, Tuvnes FA, Skjellegrind HK, Behnan J, Mughal AA, Langmoen IA, Vik-Mo EO (2016) Time-lapse phenotyping of invasive glioma cells ex vivo reveals subtype-specific movement patterns guided by tumor core signaling. Exp Cell Res 349:199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.08.001
Friedl P, Locker J, Sahai E, Segall JE (2012) Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat Cell Biol 14:777–783. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2548
Stewart MD, Jang CW, Hong NW, Austin AP, Behringer RR (2009) Dual fluorescent protein reporters for studying cell behaviors in vivo. Genesis 47:708–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20565
Masuzzo P, Hulstaert N, Huyck L, Ampe C, Van Troys M, Martens L (2013) CellMissy: a tool for management, storage and analysis of cell migration data produced in wound healing-like assays. Bioinformatics 29:2661–2663
Masuzzo P, Lynn H, Simiczyjew A, Ampe C, Martens L, Van Troys M (2017) An end-to-end software solution for the analysis of high-throughput single-cell migration data. Sci Rep 13:42383. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42383
Masuzzo P, Martens L (2015) An open data ecosystem for cell migration research. Trends Cell Biol 25:55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2014.11.005
De Wever O, Hendrix A, De Boeck A, Eertmans F, Westbroek W, Braems G, Bracke ME (2014) Single cell and spheroid collagen type i invasion assay. Methods Mol Biol 1070:13–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8244-4_2
Hulkower KI, Herber RL (2011) Cell migration and invasion assays as tools for drug discovery. Pharmaceutics 3:107–124. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics3010107
Simpson MJ, Treloar KK, Binder BJ, Haridas P, Manton KJ, Leavesley DI, McElwain DLS, Baker RE (2013) Quantifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay. J R Soc Interface 10:20130007–20130007. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0007
Johnston ST, Simpson MJ, McElwain DLS, (2014) J R Soc Interface 11:20140325. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0325
Glenn HL, Messner J, Meldrum DR (2016) A simple non-perturbing cell migration assay insensitive to proliferation effects. Sci Rep 6:31694. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31694
Raub CB, Unruh J, Suresh V, Krasieva T, Lindmo T, Gratton E, Tromberg BJ, George SC (2008) Image correlation spectroscopy of multiphoton images correlates with collagen mechanical properties. Biophys J 94:2361–2373. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.120006
Sabeh F, Shimizu-Hirota R, Weiss SJ (2009) Protease-dependent versus-independent cancer cell invasion programs: three-dimensional amoeboid movement revisited. J Cell Biol 185:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200807195
Wolf K, Alexander S, Schacht V, Coussens LM, von Andrian UH, van Rheenen J, Deryugina E, Friedl P (2009) Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20:931–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.08.005
Kunz-Schughart LA, Kreutz M, Knuechel R (1998) Multicellular spheroids: a three-dimensional in vitro culture system to study tumour biology. Int J Exp Pathol 79:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2613.1998.00051.x
Nagelkerke A, Bussink J, Sweep FCGJ, Span PN (2013) Generation of multicellular tumor spheroids of breast cancer cells: how to go three-dimensional. Anal Biochem 437:17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2013.02.004
Fennema E, Rivron N, Rouwkema J, van Blitterswijk C, De Boer J (2013) Spheroid culture as a tool for creating 3D complex tissues. Trends Biotechnol 31:108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.003
Napolitano AP, Dean DM, Man AJ, Youssef J, Ho DN, Rago AP, Lech MP, Morgan JR (2007) Scaffold-free three-dimensional cell culture utilizing micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. BioTechniques 43:494–500. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112591
Leung BM, Lesher-Perez SC, Matsuoka T, Moraes C, Takayama S (2015) Media additives to promote spheroid circularity and compactness in hanging drop platform. Biomater Sci 3:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4BM00319E
Surolia R, Li FJ, Wang Z, Li H, Liu G, Zhou Y, Luckhardt T, Bae S, Liu R, Rangarajan S, de Andrade J, Thannickal VJ, Antony VB (2017) 3D pulmospheres serve as a personalized and predictive multicellular model for assessment of antifibrotic drugs. JCI Insight 2:e91377. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.91377
Raub CB, Suresh V, Krasieva T, Lyubovitsky J, Mih JD, Putnam AJ, Tromberg BJ, George SC (2007) Noninvasive assessment of collagen gel microstructure and mechanics using multiphoton microscopy. Biophys J 92:2212–2222. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.097998
Gobeaux F, Mosser G, Anglo A, Panine P, Davidson P, Giraud-Guille MM, Belamie E (2008) Fibrillogenesis in dense collagen solutions: a physicochemical study. J Mol Biol 376:1509–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.047
Yang YL, Motte S, Kaufman LJ (2010) Pore size variable type I collagen gels and their interaction with glioma cells. Biomaterials 31:5678–5688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.039
Fraley SI, Feng Y, Krishnamurthy R, Kim D, Celedon A, Longmore GD, Wirtz D, Louis S (2010) A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility. Nat Cell Biol 12:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2062.A
Bertier L, Boucherie C, Zwaenepoel O, Vanloo B, Van Troys M, Van Audenhove I, Gettemans J (2017) Inhibitory cortactin nanobodies delineate the role of NTA- and SH3-domain-specific functions during invadopodium formation and cancer cell invasion. FASEB J 31:2460–2476. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201600810RR
Mitchell CB, O’Neill G (2016) Cooperative cell invasion: matrix metalloproteinase–mediated incorporation between cells. Mol Biol Cell 27:3284–3292
Blacher S, Erpicum C, Lenoir B, Paupert J, Moraes G, Ormenese S, Bullinger E, Noel A (2014) Cell invasion in the spheroid sprouting assay: a spatial organisation analysis adaptable to cell behaviour. PLoS One 9:e97019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097019
Kumar KS, Pillong M, Kunze J, Burghardt I, Weller M, Grotzer MA, Schneider G, Baumgartner M (2015) Computer-assisted quantification of motile and invasive capabilities of cancer cells. Sci Rep 5:15338. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15338
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme under Grant Agreement 634107 (PHC32–2014). L.H. was funded by Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent 01J04806. M.V.T. acknowledges VIB TechWatch for funding of software acquisition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Van Troys, M. et al. (2018). Analysis of Invasion Dynamics of Matrix-Embedded Cells in a Multisample Format. In: Gautreau, A. (eds) Cell Migration. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1749. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7701-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7701-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7700-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7701-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols