Skip to main content

Model Updating

Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics

Abstract

The term “model updating” describes the process of adjusting the parameters of a finite element model in order that its predictions, in terms of eigenvalues and eigenvectors, are in agreement with measurements obtained by modal testing. The sensitivity method described in this chapter has been implemented numerous times in commercial codes and applied successfully in industry. It has become a mature technology in regular use in the automotive and aerospace industries worldwide. However, there are various subtleties surrounding the application of model updating that are discussed here for the benefit of potential users. Firstly there must be an awareness of the frequency range in which the updated model is to be applied. The available data is generally insufficient to define the system parameters without the use of additional information provided by regularization. And the choice of parameters is of critical importance: it is not only a matter of choosing sensitive parameters; they should also be chosen as part of an engineering understanding of the dynamics of the system. Careful choice of parameters, together with regularization, will lead to validated models that predict the behavior of the system beyond the scope of the original test data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

f :

Vector of forces

x :

Displacement vector

z :

Vector of outputs

C :

Damping matrix

G :

Matrix of sensitivities

H :

Matrix of frequency response functions

K :

Stiffness matrix

M :

Mass matrix

P :

Matrix of stiffness-matrix eigenvalues

W :

Weighting matrix

λ :

Eigenvalue

θ :

Vector of parameters

φ :

Eigenvector

Ψ :

Matrix of stiffness-matrix eigenvectors

Cov(•, •):

Covariance matrix

\( \left(\overline{\bullet}\right) \) :

Mean

References

  1. Adhikari S, Friswell MI (2010) Distributed parameter model updating using the Karhunen-Loève expansion. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:326–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadian H, Gladwell GML, Ismail F (1997) Parameter selection strategies in finite element model updating. ASME J Vib Acoust 119:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmadian H, Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (1998) Regularisation methods for finite element model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(1):47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmadian H, Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (2002) Physical realisation of generic element parameters in model updating. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Vib Acoust 124(4):628–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Au SK (2012) Connecting Bayesian and frequentist quantification of parameter uncertainty in system identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 29:328–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balmes E (1997) Garteur Group on Ground Vibration Testing – results from the tests of a single structure by 12 laboratories in Europe. Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference IMAC XV, Orlando, pp 1346–1352

    Google Scholar 

  7. Batou A (2015) Model updating in structural dynamics – uncertainties on the position and orientation of sensors and actuators. J Sound Vib 354:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck JL, Katafygiotis L (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech 124(4):445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Behmanesh I, Moaveni B, Lombaert G, Papadimitriou C (2015) Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 64–65:360–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carvalho J, Datta BN, Gupta A, Lagadapati M (2007) A direct method for model updating with incomplete measured data and without spurious modes. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:2715–2731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins JD, Hart GC, Hasselman TK, Kennedy B (1974) Statistical identification of structures. AIAA J 12(2):185–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2000) The use of antiresonances for robust model updating. J Sound Vib 236:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Datta BN, Deng S, Sokolov VO, Sarkissian DR (2009) An optimization technique for damped model updating with measured data satisfying quadratic orthogonality constraints. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:1759–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Degener M (1997) Ground vibration results from the tests of an aircraft model performed as part of an European round robin exercise. Proceedings of the CEAS international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  15. Degener M, Hermes H (1996) Ground vibration test and finite element analysis of the GARTEUR SM-AG19 testbed. Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt e V Institut für Aeroelastik, IB 232-96 J 08

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fang SE, Ren WX, Perera R (2012) A stochastic model updating method for parameter variability quantification based on response surface models and Monte-Carlo simulation. Mech Syst Signal Process 33:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fang SE, Zhang QH, Ren WX (2015) An interval model updating strategy using interval response surface models. Mech Syst Signal Process 60–61:909–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox R, Kapoor M (1968) Rate of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. AIAA J 6:2426–2429

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Friswell MI (1989) The adjustment of structural parameters using a minimum variance estimator. Mech Syst Signal Process 3(2):143–155

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE, Ahmadian H (1998) Combining subset selection and parameter constraints in model updating. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Vib Acoust 120(4):854–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE, Ahmadian H (2001) Finite element model updating using experimental test data: parameterisation and regularisation. R Soc Philos Trans Math Phys Eng Sci 359:169–186

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Gladwell GML, Ahmadian H (1995) Generic element matrices suitable for finite element model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 9(6):601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goller B, Pradlwarter HJ, Schuëller GI (2009) Robust model updating with insufficient data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3096–3104

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Goller B, Broggi M, Calvi A, Schuëller GI (2011) A stochastic model updating technique for complex aerospace structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goulet J-A, Michel C, Smith IFC (2013) Hybrid probabilities and error domain structural identification using ambient vibration monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 37:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Govers Y, Link M (2010) Stochastic model updating – covariance matrix adjustment from uncertain experimental modal data. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(3):696–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Govers Y, Link M (2012) Using stochastic experimental modal data for identifying stochastic finite element parameters of the AIRMOD benchmark structure. Proceedings of the international conference on noise and vibration engineering, USD2012, Leuven, Belgium, pp 4697–4715

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hansen PC (1994) Regularisation tools: a MATLAB package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems. Numer Algorithms 6:1–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hua XG, Ni YQ, Chen ZQ, Ko JM (2008) An improved perturbation method for stochastic finite element model updating. Int J Numer Methods Eng 73:1845–1864

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Hua XG, Ni YQ, Ko JM (2009) Adaptive regularisation parameter optimization in output-error-based finite element model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:563–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hua XG, Wen Q, Ni YQ, Chen ZQ (2017) Assessment of stochastically updated finite element models using reliability indicator. Mech Syst Signal Process 82:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacquelin E, Adhikari S, Friswell MI (2012) A second-moment approach for direct probabilistic model updating in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 29:262–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Katafygiotis L, Beck JL (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. II: model identifiability. J Eng Mech 124(4):463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kenigsbuch R, Halevi Y (1998) Model updating in structural dynamics: a generalised reference basis approach. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khodaparast HH, Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (2008) Perturbation methods for the estimation of parameter variability in stochastic model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(8):1751–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Khodaparast HH, Mottershead JE, Badcock KJ (2011) Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the Kriging predictor. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(4):1204–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuo Y-C, Datta BN (2012) Quadratic model updating with no spillover and incomplete measured data: existence and computation of solution. Linear Algebra Appl 436:2480–2493

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Lallement G, Piranda J (1990) Localisation methods for parameter updating of finite element models in elastodynamics. IMAC IIX, Orlando, pp 579–585

    Google Scholar 

  40. Link M (1999) Updating of analytical models – basic procedures and extensions. In: Silva JMM, Maia NMM (eds) Modal analysis and testing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 281–304

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Link M, Friswell MI (2003) Working group 1: generation of validated structural dynamic models- results of a benchmark study Utilising the GARTEUR SM-AG19 test-bed. In: Golinval J-C, Link M (eds) COST action F3 “structural dynamics” (1997–2001)- an European co-operation in the field of science and technology. Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing, vol 17, no (1), pp 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mao X, Dai H (2012) Finite element model updating with positive definiteness and no spillover. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mares C, Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (2006) Stochastic model updating: part 1- theory and simulated examples. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1674–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mottershead JE, Foster CD (1991) On the treatment of ill-conditioning in spatial parameter estimation from measured vibration data. Mech Syst Signal Process 5(2):139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (1993) Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey. J Sound Vib 167(2):347–375

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Mottershead JE, Friswell MI, Ng GHT, Brandon JA (1996) Geometric parameters for finite element model updating of joints and constraints. Mech Syst Signal Process 10(2):171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mottershead JE, Mares C, Friswell MI, James S (2000) Selection and updating of parameters for an aluminium space-frame model. Mech Syst Signal Process 14(6):923–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mottershead JE, Mares C, James S, Friswell MI (2006) Stochastic model updating: part 2- application to a set of physical structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(8):2171–2185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mottershead JE, Link M, Friswell MI (2011) The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(7):2275–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mthembu L, Marwala T, Friswell MI, Adhikari S (2011) Model selection in finite element model updating using the Bayesian evidence statistic. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2399–2412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Natke HG (1991) On regularization methods applied to the error localization of mathematical models. Proc Int Modal Analysis Conf IMAC IX, Florence, pp 70–73

    Google Scholar 

  52. Natke HG (2004) Einführung in Theorie und Praxis der Zeitreihen und Modalanalyse. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Natke HG, Lallement G, Cottin N (1995) Properties of various residuals within updating of mathematical models. Inverse Prob Eng 1:329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Patelli E, Govers Y, Broggi M, Martins Gomes H, Link M, Mottershead JE (2017) Sensitivity or Bayesian model updating: a comparison of techniques using the DLR AIRMOD test data. Arch Appl Mech 87(5):905–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Prells U (1996) A regularisation method for the linear error localisation of models of elastomechanical systems. Inverse Prob Eng 3:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schedlinski C (2012) Finite element model validation of a large spinning facility. Proceedings, ISMA 2012, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schedlinski C (2018) ICS.sysval product description. http://www.ics-engineering.com

  58. Schedlinski C, Staples B (2004) Computational model updating of axisymmetric systems. Proceedings of the noise and vibration engineering conference, ISMA 2004, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schedlinski C, et al (2004) Experimental modal analysis and computational model updating of a body in white. Proceedings of the noise and vibration engineering conference, ISMA 2004, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  60. Schedlinski C, et al (2008) Computational model updating of structural damping and acoustic absorption for coupled fluid-structure-analyses of passenger cars. Proceedings of the Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference, ISMA 2008, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  61. Silva T, Maia NMM, Link M, Mottershead JE (2016) Parameter selection and covariance updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 70–71:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Simoen E, De Roeck G, Lombaert G (2015) Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review. Mech Syst Signal Process 56–57:123–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Smith SW (1998) Iterative matrix approximation for model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(1):187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solutions of ill-posed problems. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Titurus B, Friswell MI (2008) Regularization in model updating. Int J Numer Methods Eng 75(4):440–478

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang X, Hill TL, Neild SA, Shaw AD, Khodaparast HH, Friswell MI (2018) Model updating strategy for structures with localized nonlinearities using frequency response measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process 100:940–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Webber B, Paultre P, Proulx J (2009) Consistent regularisation of nonlinear model updating for damage identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:1965–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Xie D (2011) A numerical method of structure-preserving model updating problem and its perturbation theory. Appl Math Comput 217:6364–6371

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Yuan Y (2009) A symmetric inverse eigenvalue problem in structural dynamic model updating. Appl Math Comput 213:516–521

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Yuen K-V (2010) Bayesian methods for structural dynamics and civil engineering. Wiley, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. Yuen K-V (2012) Updating large models for mechanical systems using incomplete modal measurement. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhang EL, Feissel P, Antoni J (2011) A comprehensive Bayesian approach for model updating and quantification of modelling errors. Probab Eng Mech 26:550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The content and images presented for the automotive example problem are published with the kind permission of the Volkswagen AG, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Mottershead .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Society for Experimental Mechanics

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mottershead, J.E., Link, M., Friswell, M.I., Schedlinski, C. (2020). Model Updating. In: Allemang, R., Avitabile, P. (eds) Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6503-8_18-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6503-8_18-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6503-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6503-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Model Updating
    Published:
    02 September 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6503-8_18-2

  2. Original

    Model Updating
    Published:
    22 January 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6503-8_18-1