Abstract
Bacterial persister cells are dormant cells, tolerant to multiple antibiotics, that are involved in several chronic infections. Toxin–antitoxin modules play a significant role in the generation of such persister cells. Toxin–antitoxin modules are small genetic elements, omnipresent in the genomes of bacteria, which code for an intracellular toxin and its neutralizing antitoxin. In the past decade, mathematical modeling has become an important tool to study the regulation of toxin–antitoxin modules and their relation to the emergence of persister cells. Here, we provide an overview of several numerical methods to simulate toxin–antitoxin modules. We cover both deterministic modeling using ordinary differential equations and stochastic modeling using stochastic differential equations and the Gillespie method. Several characteristics of toxin–antitoxin modules such as protein production and degradation, negative autoregulation through DNA binding, toxin–antitoxin complex formation and conditional cooperativity are gradually integrated in these models. Finally, by including growth rate modulation, we link toxin–antitoxin module expression to the generation of persister cells.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pomerening JR, Sontag ED, Ferrell JE Jr (2003) Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. Nat Cell Biol 5(4):346–351
Novak B, Tyson JJ (1993) Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. J Cell Sci 106(Pt 4):1153–1168
Noble D (2004) Modeling the heart. Physiology (Bethesda) 19:191–197
Grassly NC, Fraser C (2008) Mathematical models of infectious disease transmission. Nat Rev Microbiol 6(6):477–487
Cataudella I, Trusina A, Sneppen K, Gerdes K, Mitarai N (2012) Conditional cooperativity in toxin-antitoxin regulation prevents random toxin activation and promotes fast translational recovery. Nucleic Acids Res 40(14):6424–6434
Kussell E, Kishony R, Balaban NQ, Leibler S (2005) Bacterial persistence: a model of survival in changing environments. Genetics 169(4):1807–1814
Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S (2004) Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305(5690):1622–1625
Cogan NG (2007) Incorporating toxin hypothesis into a mathematical model of persister formation and dynamics. J Theor Biol 248(2):340–349
Rotem E, Loinger A, Ronin I, Levin-Reisman I, Gabay C, Shoresh N, Biham O, Balaban NQ (2010) Regulation of phenotypic variability by a threshold-based mechanism underlies bacterial persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(28):12541–12546
Lou C, Li Z, Ouyang Q (2008) A molecular model for persister in E. coli. J Theor Biol 255(2):205–209
Koh RS, Dunlop MJ (2012) Modeling suggests that gene circuit architecture controls phenotypic variability in a bacterial persistence network. BMC Syst Biol 6:47
Cataudella I, Sneppen K, Gerdes K, Mitarai N (2013) Conditional cooperativity of toxin - antitoxin regulation can mediate bistability between growth and dormancy. PLoS Comput Biol 9(8):e1003174
Fasani RA, Savageau MA (2013) Molecular mechanisms of multiple toxin-antitoxin systems are coordinated to govern the persister phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(27):E2528–E2537
Gelens L, Hill L, Vandervelde A, Danckaert J, Loris R (2013) A general model for toxin-antitoxin module dynamics can explain persister cell formation in E. coli. PLoS Comput Biol 9(8):e1003190
Feng J, Kessler DA, Ben-Jacob E, Levine H (2014) Growth feedback as a basis for persister bistability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(1):544–549
Lewis K (2010) Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:357–372
Fauvart M, De Groote VN, Michiels J (2011) Role of persister cells in chronic infections: clinical relevance and perspectives on anti-persister therapies. J Med Microbiol 60(Pt 6):699–709
Maisonneuve E, Gerdes K (2014) Molecular mechanisms underlying bacterial persisters. Cell 157(3):539–548
Maisonneuve E, Castro-Camargo M, Gerdes K (2013) (p)ppGpp controls bacterial persistence by stochastic induction of toxin-antitoxin activity. Cell 154(5):1140–1150
Pandey DP, Gerdes K (2005) Toxin-antitoxin loci are highly abundant in free-living but lost from host-associated prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 33(3):966–976
Fozo EM, Hemm MR, Storz G (2008) Small toxic proteins and the antisense RNAs that repress them. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72(4):579–589
Gerdes K, Maisonneuve E (2012) Bacterial persistence and toxin-antitoxin loci. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:103–123
Buts L, Lah J, Dao-Thi MH, Wyns L, Loris R (2005) Toxin-antitoxin modules as bacterial metabolic stress managers. Trends Biochem Sci 30(12):672–679
Yamaguchi Y, Park JH, Inouye M (2011) Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria and archaea. Annu Rev Genet 45:61–79
Blower TR, Salmond GP, Luisi BF (2011) Balancing at survival’s edge: the structure and adaptive benefits of prokaryotic toxin-antitoxin partners. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21(1):109–118
Blower TR, Short FL, Rao F, Mizuguchi K, Pei XY, Fineran PC, Luisi BF, Salmond GP (2012) Identification and classification of bacterial Type III toxin-antitoxin systems encoded in chromosomal and plasmid genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 40(13):6158–6173
Wang X, Lord DM, Cheng HY, Osbourne DO, Hong SH, Sanchez-Torres V, Quiroga C, Zheng K, Herrmann T, Peti W, Benedik MJ, Page R, Wood TK (2012) A new type V toxin-antitoxin system where mRNA for toxin GhoT is cleaved by antitoxin GhoS. Nat Chem Biol 8(10):855–861
Maisonneuve E, Shakespeare LJ, Jorgensen MG, Gerdes K (2011) Bacterial persistence by RNA endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(32):13206–13211
Helaine S, Cheverton AM, Watson KG, Faure LM, Matthews SA, Holden DW (2014) Internalization of Salmonella by macrophages induces formation of nonreplicating persisters. Science 343(6167):204–208
Tripathi A, Dewan PC, Barua B, Varadarajan R (2012) Additional role for the ccd operon of F-plasmid as a transmissible persistence factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(31):12497–12502
Tian QB, Ohnishi M, Tabuchi A, Terawaki Y (1996) A new plasmid-encoded proteic killer gene system: cloning, sequencing, and analyzing hig locus of plasmid Rts1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 220(2):280–284
Yamaguchi Y, Park JH, Inouye M (2009) MqsR, a crucial regulator for quorum sensing and biofilm formation, is a GCU-specific mRNA interferase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 284(42):28746–28753
Hallez R, Geeraerts D, Sterckx Y, Mine N, Loris R, Van Melderen L (2010) New toxins homologous to ParE belonging to three-component toxin-antitoxin systems in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Mol Microbiol 76(3):719–732
Overgaard M, Borch J, Gerdes K (2009) RelB and RelE of Escherichia coli form a tight complex that represses transcription via the ribbon-helix-helix motif in RelB. J Mol Biol 394(2):183–196
Schumacher MA, Piro KM, Xu W, Hansen S, Lewis K, Brennan RG (2009) Molecular mechanisms of HipA-mediated multidrug tolerance and its neutralization by HipB. Science 323(5912):396–401
Loris R, Dao-Thi MH, Bahassi EM, Van Melderen L, Poortmans F, Liddington R, Couturier M, Wyns L (1999) Crystal structure of CcdB, a topoisomerase poison from E. coli. J Mol Biol 285(4):1667–1677
Li GY, Zhang Y, Chan MC, Mal TK, Hoeflich KP, Inouye M, Ikura M (2006) Characterization of dual substrate binding sites in the homodimeric structure of Escherichia coli mRNA interferase MazF. J Mol Biol 357(1):139–150
Garcia-Pino A, Balasubramanian S, Wyns L, Gazit E, De Greve H, Magnuson RD, Charlier D, van Nuland NA, Loris R (2010) Allostery and intrinsic disorder mediate transcription regulation by conditional cooperativity. Cell 142(1):101–111
Afif H, Allali N, Couturier M, Van Melderen L (2001) The ratio between CcdA and CcdB modulates the transcriptional repression of the ccd poison-antidote system. Mol Microbiol 41(1):73–82
Overgaard M, Borch J, Jorgensen MG, Gerdes K (2008) Messenger RNA interferase RelE controls relBE transcription by conditional cooperativity. Mol Microbiol 69(4):841–857
De Jonge N, Garcia-Pino A, Buts L, Haesaerts S, Charlier D, Zangger K, Wyns L, De Greve H, Loris R (2009) Rejuvenation of CcdB-poisoned gyrase by an intrinsically disordered protein domain. Mol Cell 35(2):154–163
Brown BL, Lord DM, Grigoriu S, Peti W, Page R (2013) The Escherichia coli toxin MqsR destabilizes the transcriptional repression complex formed between the antitoxin MqsA and the mqsRA operon promoter. J Biol Chem 288(2):1286–1294
Magnuson R, Lehnherr H, Mukhopadhyay G, Yarmolinsky MB (1996) Autoregulation of the plasmid addiction operon of bacteriophage P1. J Biol Chem 271(31):18705–18710
Dao-Thi MH, Charlier D, Loris R, Maes D, Messens J, Wyns L, Backmann J (2002) Intricate interactions within the ccd plasmid addiction system. J Biol Chem 277(5):3733–3742
McAdams HH, Arkin A (1999) It’s a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet 15(2):65–69
Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297(5584):1183–1186
Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Kurtser I, Grossman AD, van Oudenaarden A (2002) Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet 31(1):69–73
Carrier GF (1968) Ordinary differential equations. A Blaisdell book in pure and applied mathematics. Blaisdell Pub. Co, Waltham, MA
Atkinson K, Han W, Stewart DE (2009) Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Pure and applied mathematics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Coffey WT, Kalmykov YP, Waldron JT (2004) The Langevin equation. With applications to stochastic problems in physics, chemistry and electrical engineering. World Scientific series in contemporary chemical physics. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
Gardiner CW (2004) Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry, and the natural sciences. Springer, Berlin
San Miguel M, Toral R (2000) Stochastic effects in physical systems. In: Instabilities and nonequilibrium structures VI. Springer, Netherlands, pp 35–127
Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 81(25):2340–2361
Cai L, Friedman N, Xie XS (2006) Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature 440(7082):358–362
McAdams HH, Arkin A (1997) Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(3):814–819
Loris R, Garcia-Pino A (2014) Disorder- and dynamics-based regulatory mechanisms in toxin-antitoxin modules. Chem Rev 114(13):6933–6947
Hayes F, Van Melderen L (2011) Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 46(5):386–408
Nevozhay D, Adams RM, Van Itallie E, Bennett MR, Balazsi G (2012) Mapping the environmental fitness landscape of a synthetic gene circuit. PLoS Comput Biol 8(4):e1002480
Castro-Roa D, Garcia-Pino A, De Gieter S, van Nuland NA, Loris R, Zenkin N (2013) The Fic protein Doc uses an inverted substrate to phosphorylate and inactivate EF-Tu. Nat Chem Biol 9(12):811–817
Christensen SK, Gerdes K (2003) RelE toxins from bacteria and Archaea cleave mRNAs on translating ribosomes, which are rescued by tmRNA. Mol Microbiol 48(5):1389–1400
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), by the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) for project support and individual support (A.V. and L.G.), by the Belgian American Educational Foundation (L.G.), and by the Onderzoeksraad of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. The authors thank Lydia Hill, Abel Garcia-Pino, and Egon Geerardyn for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Numerical Code to Solve an ODE/SDE
A simple matlab code to solve Eq. 10, with (D ≠ 0) or without noise (D = 0), can be found here below:
1 function ODE_SDE
2
3 %% parameters
4 prodAT = 0.0530 * 0.116086/0.00203;
5 degrAT = 2.8881e-4;
6 D = 25;
7 dt = 0.01; % [s] simulation time step
8 dt_save = 10; % [s] plotting time step
9 t_end = 5*60*60; % [s] final time
10
11 %% initialize system
12 AT = 0;
13 t_saved = [];
14 AT_saved = [];
15 count = 0;
16
17 %% simulate the stochastic differential equation
18 for n = 0:((t_end)/dt)
19 t = n * dt;
20
21 %% Euler-Heun
22 noise = sqrt(D) * sqrt(dt) * randn(); % sample from the noise
23
24 AT_star = AT + dt * F(AT) + noise;
25 AT = AT + (dt/2)*(F(AT) + F(AT_star)) + noise/2;
26 AT = max(AT, 0); % force protein concentration to be positive
27
28 %% Save data
29 if (count == dt_save/dt)
30 t_saved(end+1) = t;
31 AT_saved(end+1) = AT;
32 count = 0;
33 end
34 count = count + 1;
35
36 end
37
38 %% plot the results
39 figure;
40 plot(t_saved./3600, AT_saved, 'k');
41 xlabel('Time (h)')
42 ylabel('AT')
43
44 %% definition of the differential equation
45 function dATdt = F(TA)
46 dATdt = prodAT - degrAT*TA;
47 end
48 end
Appendix 2: Numerical Code Using the Gillespie Algorithm
A simple matlab code to solve Eq. 1 using the stochastic Gillespie Algorithm can be found here below:
1 % Gillespie code
2 % There are 2 reactions and there is one species AT
3
4 %% Parameters
5 prodAT = 0.0530*0.116086/0.00203; % reaction 0 -> AT
6 degrAT = 2.8881e-4; % reaction AT -> 0
7
8 %% Initialization
9 AT = 0; % [AT] initial concentration AT
10 t = 0; % [s] starting time
11 t_end = 5*60*60; % [s] final time
12 t_saved = []; % [s] stored times
13 AT_saved = [];
14
15 %% Simulation
16 while t <= t_end
17 %% Update propensities
18 p1 = degrAT * AT;
19 p2 = prodAT;
20
21 %% Computation of the random time step
22 p0 = p1 + p2;
23 r1 = rand();
24 r2 = rand();
25 dt = 1/p0 * log(1/r1); % [s] next time step
26
27 %% Selection of random reaction
28 %% Update the population based on selected reaction
29 yr2 = r2 * p0;
30 if yr2 <= p1
31 % reaction 1
32 AT = AT - 1;
33 else
34 % reaction 2
35 AT = AT + 1;
36 end
37
38 %% Update the current time
39 t = t + dt;
40
41 %% Save population information
42 t_saved(end+1) = t;
43 AT_saved(end+1) = AT;
44
45 end
46
47 %% plot the results
48 figure;
49 plot(t_saved./3600, AT_saved, 'k');
50 xlabel('Time (h)')
51 ylabel('AT')
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Vandervelde, A., Loris, R., Danckaert, J., Gelens, L. (2016). Computational Methods to Model Persistence. In: Michiels, J., Fauvart, M. (eds) Bacterial Persistence. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1333. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_17
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2853-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2854-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols