Abstract
Minimally invasive rectal surgery is technically challenging because of a narrow and deep pelvis. As a direct consequence, the majority of rectal resections in the US are performed open or with a combined laparoscopic-open approach. The use of a robotic platform may facilitate minimally invasive rectal resection. Surgeons experienced in advanced laparoscopic techniques may find that the robot may enhance the ability to complete rectal procedures, offering patients the benefits of a minimally invasive technique including its enhanced recovery. It is noteworthy that a number of technical principles are common to various rectal procedures. Within this chapter, a detailed description of a hybrid laparoscopic-robotic low anterior resection is provided with emphasis on the technical aspects that allow surgeons to easily transition from one step to the next while achieving the goal of completing the procedure in a minimally invasive fashion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Laparoscopically assisted colectomy is as safe and effective as open colectomy in people with colon cancer Abstracted from: Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, et al.; for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050–9. Cancer treatment reviews. 2004;30(8):707–9. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2004.09.001.
Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):44–52. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70310-3.
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477–84. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70221-7.
Baik SH. Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2008;49(6):891–6. doi:10.3349/ymj.2008.49.6.891.
Bianchi PP, Luca F, Petz W, Valvo M, Cenciarelli S, Zuccaro M, et al. The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7:357. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2013.357.
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(21):3061–8. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.7758.
Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638–45. doi:10.1002/bjs.7160.
van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–8. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70016-0.
Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):535–50. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828cb66c.
McKay GD, Morgan MJ, Wong SK, Gatenby AH, Fulham SB, Ahmed KW, et al. Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(1):42–50. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318239341f.
Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(4):464–71. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5.
Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(7):637–45. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5.
Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg. 2009;250(1):54–61. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511.
Baek JH, Pastor C, Pigazzi A. Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):521–5. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1204-x.
Baek SJ, Al-Asari S, Jeong DH, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):4157–63. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3014-4.
Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):151–6. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fec4fd.
Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3195–202. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1162-5.
Scarpinata R, Aly EH. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(2):253–62. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182694595.
Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edlin R, et al. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(2):233–41. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1313-6.
Ahmed K, Khan MS, Vats A, Nagpal K, Priest O, Patel V, et al. Current status of robotic assisted pelvic surgery and future developments. Int J Surg. 2009;7(5):431–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.08.008.
Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg. 2013;37(12):2782–90. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2024-7.
Lin S, Jiang HG, Chen ZH, Zhou SY, Liu XS, Yu JR. Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(47):5214–20. doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i47.5214.
Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2095–101. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2270-1.
Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Shi C, Zou Y, Qin H, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3727–36. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2429-9.
Kang J, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):154–5. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4.
Leong QM, Son DN, Cho JS, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Amar AH, et al. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2987–92. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6.
Peterson CY, McLemore EC, Horgan S, Talamini MA, Ramamoorthy SL. Technical aspects of robotic proctectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(3):189–93. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824be924.
Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, Rullier A, Laurent C. Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):560–7. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827c4a8c.
Richardson DP, Porter GA, Johnson PM. Population-based use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer: is there room for improvement? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(6):704–10. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182758c2b.
Tilney HS, Tekkis PP. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(1):3–15. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01226.x; discussion 6.
Heald RJ. The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med. 1988;81(9):503–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
In this video, the surgeon demonstrates his approach to hybrid laparoscopic-robotic low anterior resection. (MPG 1059830 kb)
Key Operative Steps
Key Operative Steps
-
1.
The patient is placed on the operating room table in modified lithotomy position and secured to prevent movement when the bed is changed to different positions.
-
2.
The abdominal cavity is accessed and insufflated. Ports are placed after insufflation is complete.
-
3.
The abdomen is thoroughly explored to rule out metastatic disease.
-
4.
The inferior mesenteric vessels are identified then divided and the mesocolon is dissected away from retroperitoneal structures in a medial-to-lateral fashion. Care is taken to identify and protect the ureter.
-
5.
The lateral attachments along the line of Toldt are divided and the splenic flexure is then mobilized.
-
6.
Once the colon has been mobilized, the ureter identified, and the inferior mesenteric vessels divided, the robotic portion of the procedure begins.
-
7.
rTME starts at the sacral promontory as the avascular plane between the EVF that contains the mesorectum and the endopelvic parietal fascia is entered. As dissection starts, it is important to identify the hypogastric nerves in this area and gently dissected them away from the operating field.
-
8.
Dissecting as far distal as possible in the posterior plane makes identification of the lateral stalks and dissection in the anterolateral areas easier.
-
9.
As the peritoneal reflection is opened anteriorly, precise sharp dissection helps prevent injury to the seminal vesicles and prostate in men and the vaginal wall in women. As dissection progresses, the lateral stalks are divided.
-
10.
The distal rectum is then transected at the desired level with a stapler. The robot is then undocked.
-
11.
A Pfannenstiel incision is then made and the specimen delivered into the operative field. The proximal margin of resection is then divided with a stapler.
-
12.
A circular stapler is used to create the colorectal anastomosis. Anastomotic integrity is checked and then the trocars are removed and all incisions are closed.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bosio, R.M., Pigazzi, A. (2015). Hybrid Laparoscopic-Robotic Low Anterior Resection. In: Kim, J., Garcia-Aguilar, J. (eds) Surgery for Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1893-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1893-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1892-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1893-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)