Skip to main content

A Comparative Approach to Reconstructing the Socioecology of Extinct Primates

  • Chapter
Reconstructing Behavior in the Primate Fossil Record

Part of the book series: Advances in Primatology ((AIPR))

Abstract

Some aspects of behavior can be reconstructed in the fossil record because structure and function (i.e., behavior) are directly linked. For instance, one may be able to reconstruct the diet of an extinct taxon based on a variety of morphological features that are known to have certain functions among extant species. Many chapters in this book follow this approach, which, for all its limitations (Kay and Cartmill, 1977; Kay, 1984), may produce the most reliable reconstructions of the behavior and ecology of extinct species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiello, L. C. and Wheeler, P. 1995. The expensive tissue hypothesis. Curr. Anthropol. 36: 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andelman, S. J. 1986. Ecological and social determinants of cercopithecine mating patterns. In:D. I. Rubenstein and R. W. Wrangham (eds.) Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds andMammals pp. 201–216. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. 1996. Palaeoecology and hominoid palaeoenvironments. Biol. Rev. 71: 257–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., and van Couvering, J. A. H. 1975. Palaeoenvironments in the East African Miocene.In: F. Szalay (ed.) Contributions to Primatology. pp. 62–103. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics, J., and van Tienderen, P. H. 1991. Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 166–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. A., and Purvis, A. 1994. Primate brains and ecology: looking beneath the surface. In: B. Thierry, J. R. Anderson, J. J. Roeder, and N. Herrenschmidt (eds.) Current Primatology pp. 1–9. Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. A., Purvis, A., and Harvey, P. H. 1995. Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 348: 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleisch, W., Cheng Ao-Song, Ren Xiao-Dong, and Xie Jia-Hua 1993. Preliminary results from a field study of wild guizhou snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus brelichi). Folia Primatol. 60: 7282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartmill, M. 1980. Morphology, function, and evolution of the anthropoid postorbital septum. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.) Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift pp. 243–274. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A., Walker, S., and Lefebvre, L. 1990. Reproductive strategies of primates: the influence of body size and diet on litter size. Primates 31: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. 1993. Life History Invariants. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, D. L., and Wrangham, R. W. 1987. Predation. In: B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Primate Societies, pp. 227–239. Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H., 1977a. Primate ecology and social organization. J. Zool. 183: 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. 1977b. Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In: T.H.Clutton-Brock (ed.), Primate Ecology, pp. 557–579. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. 1980. Primates, brains and ecology. J Zool. 190: 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. 1984. Comparative approaches to investigating adapta-tion. In:J.R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (eds.), Behavioural Ecology, pp. 7–29.Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, G. B., and Hill, J. E. 1991. A World List of Mammalian Species. Oxford University Press,Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, C. M., and Wilson, W. L. 1980. The ecological separation of Macaca nemestrina and Macaca fascicularis in Sumatra. In: D. G. Lindburg (ed.), The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, pp. 148–181. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., Omland, K., and Oakley, T. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 361–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagosto, M., and Terranova, C. J. 1992. Estimating the body size of Eocene primates: acomparison of results from dental and postcranial variables. Int. J. Primatol. 13: 307–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. G., and Oates, J. F. 1994. Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology Behaviour and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Fiori, A., and Rendall, D. 1994. Evolution of social organization: a reappraisal for primates by using phylogenetic methods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 9941–9945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. 1991. Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol. 57: 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. 1992a. Behavioural ecology of the extinct papionines. J. Hum. Evol. 22: 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. 1992b. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 20: 469–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. 1993. Socioecology of the extinct theropiths: a modelling approach. In:N. G. Jablonski (ed.) Theropithecus: The Rise and Fall of a Primate Genus pp. 465–486. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris J.S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G. 1984. Primate locomotion and diet In:D.J. Chivers, B. A. Wood, and A. Bilsborough(eds.), Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G. 1988. Primate Adaptation and Evolution. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G., and Kay, 1985. The paleobiology of catarrhines. In: E. Delson (ed.) Ancestors: The Hard Evidence pp. 23–36. A. R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G., and Reed, K. E. 1996. Comparing primate communities: a multivariate approach. J. Hum. Evol. 30: 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumhoff, P. C., and Reeve, H. K. 1994. Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48: 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, T., Jr., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., and Jones, J. A. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42: 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, T., Jr., Martin, K. L. M., and Diaz-Uriarte, R. 1997. Reconstructing ancestral trait values using squared-change parsimony: plasma osmolarity at the origin of amniotes. In: S. S. Sumida and K. L. M. Martin (eds.) Amniote Origins pp. 425–501. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gautier-Hion, A., Bourlière, F., Guatier, J.-P., and Kingdon, J. 1988. A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. R. 1986. Cognition, brain size and the extraction of embedded food resources. In: G. Else and P. C. Lee (eds.) Primate Ontogeny Cognitive and Social Behavior pp. 93–105. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D., Smith, B. H., and Rosenberg, K. 1982. Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 58: 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman, J. L., and Luh, 1992. On comparing comparative methods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman, J. L., and Luh, H. K. 1994. Phylogeny, evolutionary models, and comparative methods: a simulation study. In: P. Eggleton and R. I. Vane-Wright (eds.) Phylogenetics and Ecology pp. 103–122. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H., and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H., Read, A. F., and Promislow, D. E. L. 1989. Life history variation in placental mammals: unifying the data with theory. In: P. H. H. Partridge (ed.) Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology pp. 13–31. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K. 1992. Sharing and collective action. In: E. A. Smith and B. Winterhalder (eds.) Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior pp. 269–300. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladik, C. M. 1975. Ecology, diet, and social patterning in Old and New World primates. In: R. H. Tuttle (ed.) Socioecology and Psychology of Primates pp. 3–35. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, C. H., and Goldsmith, M. 1995. Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risk. Behay. Ecol. 6: 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M., and Heymann, E. W. 1996. Nonconvergence in the evolution of primate life history and socio-ecology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F. 1984. On the use of anatomical features to infer foraging behavior in extinct primates. In: P. Rodman, and J. Cant (eds.) Adaptations for Foraging in Nonhuman Primates. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F. 1994. “Giant” tamarin from the Miocene of Columbia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 95: 333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., and Cartmill, M. 1977. Cranial morphology and adaptations of Palaecthon nacimienti and other Paromomyidae (Plesiadapoidea, ?Primates), with a description of a new genus and species. J. Hum. Evol. 6: 19–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., and Williams, B.A. this volume. The adaptations of Branisella boliviana, the earliest South American monkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, M. 1961. The Fire of Life: An Introduction to Animal Energetics. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, H. 1968. Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R. 1994. Ontogenetic correlates of diet in anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94: 499–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E. P., and Garland, T., Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E. P., and Hansen, T. F. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. In: E. Martins (ed.) Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior pp. 22–75. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab, B. K. 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am. Nat. 97: 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K., and May, M. L. 1976. Body weight, diet and home range area in primates. Nature 259: 459–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C., and Rodman, P. S. 1979. Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C., Gros-Louis, J., and Richards, A. F. 1996. Sexual dimorphism, the operational sexratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. Am. Nat. 147: 966–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, C. L. 1995. A simulation test of Smith’s “degrees of freedom” correction for comparativestudies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 98: 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, C. L. (2000). Collective action, free-riders, and male extragroup conflict. In: P. Kappeler (ed.) Primate Males pp. 192–204. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, C. L., and Smith, K. K. 1998. Statistical analyses of developmental sequences: the craniofacial region in marsupial and placental mammals. Am. Nat. 152: 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omland, K. 1997. Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: repeated loss of dichromatism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution 51: 1636–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 255: 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. this volume. Reconstructing social behavior from dimorphism in the fossil record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., and van Schaik, C. P. 1997. Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphismin anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 103: 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pm-vis, A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 348: 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A., and Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Computer Applications in the Biosciences (CABIOS) 11: 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., and Luh, H. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167: 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A., Nee, S., and Harvey, P. H. 1995. Macroevolutionary inferences from primate phylogeny. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 260: 329–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G., and Janson, C. H. 1987. Capuchins, squirrel monkeys, and atelines: socioecological convergence with Old World primates. In: B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.) Primate Societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. 1988. The intrinsic rate of natural increase and reproductive effort in primates. J. Zool. 214:199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, N. 1996. The Pictorial Guide to the Living Primates. Pogonias Press, East Hampton, NY. Rylands, A. B. 1993. Marmosets and Tamarins: Systematics, Behaviour, and Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawaguchi, T. 1990. Relative brain size, stratification, and social structure in anthropoids. Primates 31: 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter, D., Price, T., Mooers, A. O., and Ludwig, D. 1998. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 1699–1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984. Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. 1996. Biology and body size in human evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 37: 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B. and Smuts, R. W. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv. Study Behay. 22: 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. 1987. Primate Societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I. 1987. Cathemeral activity in primates: a definition. Folia Primatol. 49: 200–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., and Juanes, F. 1996. The importance of statistical power analysis: an example from Animal Behaviour. Anim. Behay. 52: 856–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., and DeVore, I. 1987. The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In: W. G. Kinzey (ed.) The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models pp. 183–237. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. 1996. Social evolution in primates: the role of ecological factors and male behavior. Proc. Br. Acad. 88: 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., and Kappeler, P. M. 1996. The social systems of gregarious lemurs: lack of convergence or evolutionary disequilibrium? Ethology 102: 915–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., and van Noordwijk, M. A. 1988. Scramble and contest in feeding competitionamong female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behaviour 105: 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P. M. 1976. Cercocebus albigena: site attachment, avoidance, and intergroup spacing. Am.Nat. 110: 911–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A., and Covert, H. H. 1994. New Early Eocene anaptomorphine primate (Omomyidae) from the Washakie Basin, Wyoming, with comments on the phylogeny and paleobiology of anaptomorphines. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 93: 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. 1977. Feeding behaviour of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In: T. H. Glutton-Brock (ed.) Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs Monkeys and Apes pp. 503–538. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. 1979. On the evolution of ape social systems. Soc. Sci. Inf. 18: 335–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. 1987. The significance of African apes for reconstructing human socialevolution. In: W. G. Kinzey (ed.) The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models pp. 51–71.State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nunn, C.L., Van Schaik, C.P. (2002). A Comparative Approach to Reconstructing the Socioecology of Extinct Primates. In: Plavcan, J.M., Kay, R.F., Jungers, W.L., van Schaik, C.P. (eds) Reconstructing Behavior in the Primate Fossil Record. Advances in Primatology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1343-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1343-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5507-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1343-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics