Skip to main content

Commentary: Astronomical Transient Detection Controlling the False Discovery Rate

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy V

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNSP,volume 902))

  • 1480 Accesses

Abstract

The two-step, False Discovery Rate-based thresholding procedures presented by Clements and Sarkar in this volume offer a computationally efficient means by which to detect faint sources lurking in collections of megapixel and gigapixel images. We compare Clements and Sarkar’s Procedure 35.1 with the False Cluster Proportion-based algorithm of Friedenberg and Genovese (arXiv:0910.5449, 2009). The former employs pixel-wise error control, while the latter employs cluster-wise error control. We find the two techniques yield source lists of similar efficiency (finding ≈ 50% of the sources detected by a more computationally intensive procedure) and purity ( ≈ 100%), if one eliminates single-pixel detections made by the Clements and Sarkar procedure. We propose that the Clements and Sarkar procedure be refined such that only statistically significant clusters are retained in the final source list, mitigating the issue of single-pixel detections and potentially improving the procedure’s efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/download/doc/detect_manual/

  2. 2.

    We note that, depending on the algorithm, a putative source may be rejected before being listed: for instance, in WAVDETECT, putative sources are rejected if they are detected only when the image-smoothing wavelet scale is smaller than that of the telescope’s point-spread function (PSF).

  3. 3.

    F&G run their algorithm assuming a false cluster proportion of 0.1.

References

  1. Bertin, E. and S. Arnouts (1996, June). SExtractor: Software for source extraction. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 117, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ebeling, H. and G. Wiedenmann (1993, January). Detecting structure in two dimensions combining Voronoi tessellation and percolation. Physical Review E 47, 704–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman, P. E., V. Kashyap, R. Rosner, and D. Q. Lamb (2002, January). A Wavelet-Based Algorithm for the Spatial Analysis of Poisson Data. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 138, 185–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedenberg, D. A. and C. R. Genovese (2009, October). Straight to the Source: Detecting Aggregate Objects in Astronomical Images with Proper Error Control. arXiv:0910.5449.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giacconi, R., A. Zirm, J. Wang, P. Rosati, M. Nonino, P. Tozzi, R. Gilli, V. Mainieri, G. Hasinger, L. Kewley, J. Bergeron, S. Borgani, R. Gilmozzi, N. Grogin, A. Koekemoer, E. Schreier, W. Zheng, and C. Norman (2002, April). Chandra Deep Field South: The 1 Ms Catalog. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 139, 369–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perone Pacifico, M., C. Genovese, I. Verdinelli, and L. Wasserman (2004). False discovery control for random fields. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99(468), 1002–1014.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter E. Freeman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freeman, P.E. (2012). Commentary: Astronomical Transient Detection Controlling the False Discovery Rate. In: Feigelson, E., Babu, G. (eds) Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy V. Lecture Notes in Statistics(), vol 902. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3520-4_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics