Skip to main content
  • 4226 Accesses

Abstract

Osteoporosis is manifested by low mineral density or by the presence of fragility fractures. The occurrence of an atraumatic vertebral fracture is sufficient enough to establish a diagnosis of osteoporosis. In 1996, the incidence of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was 700,000 which surpasses the combined fractures of the ankle and the hip. For several decades, vertebral compression fractures were thought to be benign and self-limited. This view evolved from at least two-thirds of fractures never being reported by patients to their physicians. If diagnosed, most patients underwent conservative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leidig-Bruckner G, et al. Clinical grading of spinal osteoporosis: quality of life components and spinal deformity in women with chronic low back pain and women with vertebral osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:663–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leech JA, et al. Relationship of lung function to severity of osteoporosis in women. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:68–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Silverman SL. The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone. 1992;13 suppl 2:S27–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:557–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, Edwards R, Gray LA, Stout L, Owen S, Hollingworth W, Ghdoke B, Annesley-Williams DJ, Ralston SH, Jarvik JG. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:569–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Orr R. Vertebroplasty, cognitive dissonance, and evidence-based medicine: what do we do when the ‘evidence’ says we are wrong? Cleve Clin J Med. 2010;77:8–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolster M. Consternation and questions about two vertebroplasty trials. Cleve Clin J Med. 2010;77:12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kallmes D, Buchbinder R, Jarvik J, Heagerty P, Comstock B, Turner J, Osborne R. Response to “randomized vertebroplasty trials: bad news or sham news?”. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1809–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Staples MP, Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Jarvik JG. Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;343:d3952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wasnich U. Vertebral fracture epidemiology. Bone. 1996;18:1791–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nevitt M, et al. The association of radiologically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:793–899.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith H. Painful osseous metastases. Pain Physician. 2011;14:E373–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deramond H, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: technique, indication, and results. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;36:533–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Belkoff S, et al. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine. 2001;26:151–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang K, Yan J, Lin R. Histopathologic findings of retrieved specimens of vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate cement: case control study. Spine. 2005;30:E585–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chevalier Y, Pahr D, Charlebois M, Heini P, Schneider E, Zysset P. Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:1722–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn SH, Lee S, Choi D, et al. Mechanical properties of blood-mixed polymethylmethacrylate in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Asian Spine J. 2009;3:45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tannenbaum C, et al. Yield of laboratory testing to identify secondary contributors to osteoporosis in otherwise healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:4431–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper C, et al. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:221–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van-staa T, et al. Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;20:1487–94.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Malawer M, et al. Treatment of metastatic cancer to bone. In: DeVita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S, editors. Principles and practice of oncology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1989. p. 2298–317.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gold DT. The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Bone. 1996;18:185S–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Group: T.E.P.O.S.E. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17:2214–21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Babayev M, et al. The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79:404–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Belkoff S, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. Spine. 2000;25:1061–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Riggs B, et al. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17:505S–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jensen ME, et al. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1897–904.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen ME, et al. Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Society of Spine Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:325–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rotter R, Martin H, Fuerderer S, Gabl M. Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:916–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fiors L, Lonjedo E, Leiva-Salinas C, Martinez-Rodrigo JJ. Vesselplasty: a new technical approach to treat symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:218–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jeon T, Kim S, Park WK. Lordoplasty: an alternative technique for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fracture. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bayley E, Srinivas S, Boszczyk BM. Clinical outcomes of sacroplasty in sacral insufficiency fractures: a review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1266–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Braal SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Leersum M, et al. Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy, and feasibility. Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;194:W445–51.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Patil A. Computed tomography-guided vertebroplasty using a stereotactic guidance system (stereo-guide). Surg Neurol Int. 2010;1:17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mathias J, Deramond H, Belkoff S. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 223–48.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Zoarski G, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:139–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Riew KD, Park J, Cho YS, et al. Nerve root blocks in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1722–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lieberman IH, et al. Initial outcomes and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1631–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Tillman JB, Ranstam J, Eastell R, Shabe P, Talmadge K, Boonen S. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1016–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Truumees E, et al. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Contemporary concepts in spine care: NASS. 2004:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vasconcelos S, et al. Transient arterial hypotension induced by polymethylmethacrylate injection during percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:1001–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Grados F, et al. Long-term observation of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:1410–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim M, Lee A, Min S, et al. Risk factors of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Asian Spine J. 2011;5:180–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Klazen CA, Venmans A, de Vries J, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is not a risk factor for new osteoporotic compression fractures: results from VERTOS II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1447–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Garfin S, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Spine. 2002;2:76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nevitt M, et al. Association of prevalent vertebral fractures, bone 720 density, and alendronate treatment with incident vertebral frac- 721 tures: effect of number and spinal location of fractures. Bone. 1999;25:613–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip S. Kim M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 American Academy of Pain Medicine

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, P.S. (2013). Vertebral Augmentation: Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty. In: Deer, T., et al. Comprehensive Treatment of Chronic Pain by Medical, Interventional, and Integrative Approaches. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1560-2_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1560-2_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1559-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1560-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics