Skip to main content

Mediators of Socio-technical Capital in a Networked Learning Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning

Abstract

In addition to supporting immediate instructional objectives, online learning environments can enable participants to gain value from a network of scholars and resources. This potential value in a technology-mediated network has been termed socio-technical capital. Our software, Prometheus, is being used to support online university level education under an open community model inspired by this idea. The analysis reported in this chapter examines the extent to which people who come to the online environment for instrumental objectives such as taking a course encounter persons or products of others from outside their course workspace. Various digital media available in Prometheus – discussions, resources, user profiles, and wiki pages – are compared in terms of how they support these encounters. Results show that there is appreciable bridging across classes and programs, and that the effectiveness of media for socio-technical capital depends on whether they are owned by task-specific workspaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3). Retrieved August 6, 2011 from http://sloanconsortium.org/system/files/v7n3_aviv.pdf

  • Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council, N. R. (1993). National collaboratories: Applying information technology for scientific research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. J., & Fischer, G. (2005). Transdisciplinary graduate education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donath, J. S., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (1993). Building a global network: The WBSI experience. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computerizing the international community (pp. 185–197). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Lewis, R., & Rugelj, J. (1999). Using telematics for collaborative knowledge construction. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 169–196). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The virtual classroom: Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36(2), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S., Lid, V., & Suthers, D. D. (2007). Transcendent communities. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007 (pp. 317–319). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., McKim, G., Fortuna, J., & King, A. (2000). Scientific collaboratories as socio-technical interaction networks: A theoretical approach. arXiv.org. Retrieved August 6, 2011 from http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs.CY/0005007. doi:arXiv:cs/0005007v1 [cs.CY]

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembing the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayadas, F. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks: A sloan foundation perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1. Retrieved August 6, 2011 from http://sloanconsortium.org/system/files/v1n1_mayadas.pdf

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekkedal, T., & Paulsen, M. F. (1989). Computer conferencing in distance education: Status and trends. European Journal of Education, 24(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K., & Shumar, W. (2002). Building virtual communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P. (2002). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human–computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 647–672). Upper Saddle River, NJ: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, P., & Fisher, C. (1994). Exploratory sequential data analysis: Foundations. Human Computer Interaction, 9(3–4), 251–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1971). Group expansion and the development of individuality. In D. M. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (2001). Collaborative representations: Supporting face to face and online knowledge-building discourse. Proceedings of the 34th Hawai‘i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-34), January 3–6, 2001, Maui, Hawai‘i (CD-ROM). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Chu, K.-H., & Joseph, S. (2009). Bridging socio-technical capital in an online learning environment. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawai‘i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-42), January 5–8, 2009, Waikoloa, Hawai‘i (CD-ROM). New Brunswick: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Harada, V. H., Doane, W. E. J., Yukawa, J., Harris, B., & Lid, V. (2004). Technology-supported systemic reform: An initial evaluation and reassessment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Santa Monica, CA (pp. 537–544).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., & Rosen, D. (2011). A unified framework for multi-level analysis of distributed learning. To appear in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, AB, February 27–March 1, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Yukawa, J., & Harada, V. H. (2007). An activity system analysis of a tripartite technology-supported partnership for school reform. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berlmer & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1). Retrieved August 6, 2011 from http://sloanconsortium.org/system/files/v2n1_wegerif.pdf

  • Yukawa, J., Harada, V. H., & Suthers, D. D. (2007). Professional development in communities of practice. In S. Hughes-Hassell & V. H. Harada (Eds.), School reform and the school library media specialist (pp. 179–192). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge our team members cited as co-authors above for their contributions to these ideas over the years. We especially thank Sam Joseph for design and implementation of the Prometheus code base, and Viil Lid for community interface design. This work was funded by NSF grants #0100393 and #0943147. Authors may be contacted at suthers@hawaii.edu and karhai@hawaii.edu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel D. Suthers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suthers, D.D., Chu, KH. (2012). Mediators of Socio-technical Capital in a Networked Learning Environment. In: Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., McConnell, D. (eds) Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics