Abstract
The sun provides energy for all living things on Earth. Yet along with these beneficial effects are significant negative events that may result from excessive sun exposure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Friedman RJ, Rigel DS, Kopf AW, et al. Malignant melanoma in the 1990s: the continued importance of early detection and the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA 1991, 41:201–226.
Koh H, et al. MMWR, CDC Atlanta, February 1991.
O’Donoghue MN. Sunscreen: one weapon against melanoma. Dermatol Clin. 1991; 9:789–793.
Willis I. Sensitization potential of para-aminobenzoic acid. Cosmet Toilet. 1976; 91:63.
Dromgoole SH, Maibach HI. Contact sensitization and photocontact sensitization of sun-screening agents. In: Sunscreens: Development, Evaluation and Regulatory Aspects, NJ Lowe, NA Shaath, eds. Marcel Derker, New York, 1991.
Wennerstein G, Thone P, Broathagen H, et al. The Scandinavian multicenter photopatch study: preliminary results. Contact Dermatit. 1984; 10:305–309.
Bruze M, Fregert S, Gruvberger B. Occurence of para-aminobenzoic acid and benzocaine as contaminants in sunscreen agents. Photodermatology. 1988; 5:162.
Dromgoogle SH, Maibach HI. Sunscreening agent intolerance: contact and photocontact sensitization and contact urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990; 22:1068–1078.
Gange RW, Sproker A, Matzinger E, et al. Efficacy of a sunscreen containing butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane against ultraviolet A radiation in photosensitized subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986; 15:494–499.
Roberts DL. Contact allergy to Eusolex 8021. Contact Dermatit. 1989; 20:74.
Kaidbey K, Gange, RW. Comparison of methods for assessing photoprotection against ultraviolet A in vivo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987; 16:346–353.
Taylor CR, Stern RS, Leyden JJ, et al. Photoaging/photodamage and photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990; 22:1–15.
Leroy C, Dompmartin A. Sunscreen substantivity: comparison between water and sweat resistance tests. Photodermatolrogy. 1988; 5:49–50.
Cesarini JP, Chardon A, Binet O, et al. High-protection sunscreen formulation prevents UVB-induced sunburn cell formulation. Photodermatology. 1989; 6:20–23.
Kaidbey KH. The photoprotection potential of the new superpotent sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990; 22:449–452.
Mills OH, Kligman AM. Comedogenicity of sunscreens. Arch Dermatol. 1982; 118:417–419.
Gurish MF, Robert LK, Kruegen GC, et al. The effects of various sunscreen agents on skin damage and their induction of tumor susceptability in mice subjected to ultraviolet radiation. J Invest Dermatol. 1981; 76:246–251.
Knobler E, Almeida L, Ruzkowski AM, et al. Photoallergy to benzophenone. Arch Dermatol. 1989; 125:801–804.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rigel, D.S. (1995). Sunscreen: Prevention of Aging and Skin Cancer. In: Elson, M.L. (eds) Evaluation and Treatment of the Aging Face. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8401-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8401-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8403-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8401-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive