Skip to main content

Analysing and Supporting Cooperative Practices: An Interdisciplinary Approach

  • Chapter
  • 798 Accesses

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

In this chapter we present an approach that aims at the development of a research program that entails a theoretical-empirical and a technological dimension simultaneously. The objective is both to contribute to the understanding of the socio-cognitive phenomena that underpin cooperation and collaboration in context and to contribute to the sustainable development of society by designing services that fulfil societal needs in a selected set of domains (e.g. risk and crisis management, social support for the disabled and the elderly, ecological sustainability and energy savings). One of the distinctive points of our approach is that it involves a set of researchers coming from different disciplines and working in a single team on the same empirical-theoretical and technological objects: mediated communication, cooperative practices and cooperative technologies. This approach has different but complementary faces: the naturalistic analysis of cooperative practices in different contexts, the design of services to support cooperative practices and the design of technological models, architectures and platforms that provide an infrastructure to support the cooperative services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Technologies pour la Coopération, l’Interaction et les Connaissances dans les collectifs (Technologies for Cooperation, Interaction and Knowledge in Collective).

  2. 2.

    We have no problem with such research, but it is not the topic of this chapter. Some of our recent projects are actually related to the design of participative serious games and social software for smartphones.

  3. 3.

    It is fair here to face the reality: in a context where public funding gets lower and lower, it has become critical to be able to find external resources, and this can lead to the opening of new studies in fields of application of societal concerns related to current trends in funding policies (see, e.g. Wulf et al. 2011) for a similar reflection).

  4. 4.

    But in our opinion, this cannot be reduced to a mere ‘applied science’ perspective where outcomes from academic research could be transferred and applied so as to manage problems of societal concern in an uncritical way. Quite the opposite: it is the prerogative of the field to question findings from scientific disciplines, giving new, sometimes unexpected, impetus to the study of phenomena of theoretical and practical interest.

  5. 5.

    Let us remind a trivial point: the relation between ethics and theory is always present in the definition of a research program. It is not just a question of selecting or rejecting more or less amenable fields of application: ethics orients (or should orient) the choice of theoretical objects offered to the scrutiny of the researcher.

  6. 6.

    See, for example Schmidt (2011).

  7. 7.

    Theureau characterised this orientation as ‘methodological situationism’ in order to contrast it with ‘methodological collectivism’ and ‘methodological individualism’ as research strategies for studying cognition in real-world settings (Theureau 2006).

  8. 8.

    As everyone involved in this sort of translation knows, this is far from being simple.

  9. 9.

    This point opens a traditionally much debated question: does design require any theoretical foundations to fulfil its instrumental goals? (see, e.g. Halverson 2002) in the context of CSCW).

References

  • Alaoui, M., & Lewkowicz, M. (2013). A living lab approach to involve elderly in the design of smart TV applications offering communication services. In A. Ant Ozok, & P. Zaphiris (Eds.), Online communities and social computing (Lecture notes in computer science, Ch. 37, Vol. 8029, pp. 325–334), Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atifi, H., & Marcoccia, M. (2003, July 13–18). Cultural variation and standardization in CMC. A comparative analysis of French and Moroccan Newsgroups. Paper presented at the 8th IPrA conference, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardram, J. E., Bjorn, P., Glenstrup, A. J., & Pederson, T. (2011, 19–23 March). The global interaction research initiative at the IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Proceedings of CSCW 2011 (pp. 489–495), Hangzhou, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguin, G., Lewandowski, A., & Lewkowicz, M. (2013). Sharing experience around component compositions: Application to the eclipse ecosystem. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), 4(4), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budweg, S., Lewkowicz, M., Müller, C., & Schering, S. (2012). Fostering social interaction in AAL: Methodological reflections on the coupling of real household Living Lab and SmartHome approaches. i-com, 11(3), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahier, J.-P. (2009). RCA-sos21: Serious Game pour les activités citoyennes liées au développement durable. Paper presented at the Carrefour des Possibles FING (Fédération Internet de Nouvelle Génération), Rennes, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahier, J.-P., & Zacklad, M. (2001). Expérimentation d’une approche coopérative et multi points de vue de la construction et de l’exploitation de catalogues commerciaux “actifs”. Document Numérique, 5(3–4), 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahier, J.-P., Ait-Said, A., & Zaher, L. (2008). Un Web 2.0 basé sur Hypertopic pour les initiatives de développement durable Actes de la conférence IC 2008, Atelier spécialIC 2.0, 17–19 Juin, Nancy. 17–19 Juin, Nancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahier, J.-P., El Nawas, N., Zhou, C., & Benel, A. (2011, July 6–8). Web 2.0 & serious game: Structuring knowledge for participative and educative representations of the City. Proceedings of the international conference on smart and sustainable city, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahier, J.-P., Benel, A., & Salembier, P. (2013). Towards a “non-disposable” software infrastructure for participation. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal – IxD&A (18), 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahour, B., & Salembier, P. (2012, 5–10 May). The user phenomenological experience: Evoking the lived activity with “re-situating” interviews. Paper presented at the workshop on theories behind UX research and how they are used in practice, CHI’2012, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahour, B., Salembier, P., Brassac, C., Bouraoui, J. L., Pachoud, B., Vermersch, P., et al. (2005). Methodologies for evaluating the affective experience of a mediated interaction Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Evaluating Affective Interfaces, Proceedings of the CHI 2005 conference, April 2–7. Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caussanel, J., Cahier, J.-P., Zacklad, M., & Charlet, J. (2002). Cognitive interactions in the semantic web. Paper presented at the Semantic web workshop, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A. (2003). Designing collaborative systems: A practical guide to ethnography. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montmollin, M. (1984). L’intelligence de la tâche. Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMichelis, G., & Loregian, M. (2009). From CSCW to new workstations: The itsme project. Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (pp. xvii–xix). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, E., Gauffre, G., Bach, C., & Salembier, P. (2006). Participatory design meets mixed reality design models – Implementation based on a formal instrumentation of an informal design approach. In G. Calvary, C. Pribeanu, G. Santucci & J. Vanderdonckt (Eds.), “Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces V, Procrrdings of the 6th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI2006 (Bucharest, 6–8 June) (pp. 71–84). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, T. (1995). Notes on design practice: Stories and prototypes as catalysts for communication. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUSSET. (2012). Situated computing – A proposal to explore and develop innovative socially embedded technologies. From http://www.eusset.eu/index.php?id=5

  • Février, F., Gauducheau, N., Jamet, E., Rouxel, G., & Salembier, P. (2011). La prise en compte des affects dans le domaine des interactions homme-machines : quels modèles, quelles méthodes, quels bénéfices ? Le Travail Humain, 74(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, G., & Foli, O. (2011, September 7–10). The organizational sense of internal communication practionners. Paper presented at the ESA Congress (European Sociological Association), Genève.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, C. A. (2002). Activity theory and distributed cognition: Or what does CSCW need to do with theories ? Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(1–2), 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., & Shapiro, D. (1993). From ethnographic record to system design. Some experiences from the field. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1(1), 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacour, P., Freitas, A., Benel, A., Eyraud, F., & Zambon, D. (2013). Enhancing linguistic diversity through collaborative translation. In E. H. G. Jones & E. Uribe-Jongbloed (Eds.), Minority languages and social media: Participation, policy and perspectives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, M. Marcoccia, M., Atifi, H., Benel, A., Gaglio, G., Gauducheau, N., & Tixier, M. (2008, May 20–23). Online social support: Benefits of an interdisciplinary approach for studying and designing cooperative computer-mediated solutions. In P. Hassanaly et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of COOP’08: 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (pp. 144–155), Carry-Le-Rouet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matta, N., Loriette, S., Nigro, J.-M., Barloy, Y., Cahier, J.-P., & Sediri, M. (2012). Representing experience on Road accident Management. Proceedings of WETICE, Track on Collaborative Technology for Coordinating Crisis Management, 25–27 Juin 2012, Toulouse: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merle, F., Benel, A., Doyen, G., & Gaiti, D. (2012). Decentralized documents authoring system for decentralized teamwork: Matching architecture with organizational structure. Proceedings of GROUP’2012, 27–31 October 2012, Sanibel Island (pp. 27–31). Sanibel Island: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaci, F., Filippi, G., & Salembier, P. (2012). Coordination and artifacts in joint activity: the case of tagging in high-risk industries. Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 41(Suppl 1), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, C., Marx, A., & Pipek, V. (2012). Crisis management 2.0: Towards a systematization of social software use in crisis situations. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM), 4(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salembier, P. (2013, February 22). A brief (and subjective) history of francophone ergonomics. Paper presented at the workshop on Francophone ergonomics & CSCW, ECSCW 2013, Paphos, Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salembier, P., & Legout, M.-C. (2012, July 23–28). Analysing the design process of an interactive music installation in the urban space. Proceedings of the ICMPC – ESCOM 2012 joint conference (12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition – 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music. Symposium on Cognition in Musical Composition: methodologies, results, challenges. Thessaloniki, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salembier, P., Dugdale, J., Frejus, M., & Haradji, Y. (2009, September 30–October 2). A descriptive model of contextual activities for the design of domestic situations. Proceedings of ECCE 2009. Helsinki: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (2011). Cooperative work and coordinative practices – Contributions to the conceptual foundations of computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (2013). Constructing CSCW: The first quarter century. Computer Supported Cooperative Work – The Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices, 22(4–6), 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., Bannon, L., & Wagner, I. (2011). Lest we forget – The European field study tradition and the issue of conditions of work in CSCW research. ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24–28 September 2011, Aarhus, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulier, E., & Caussanel, J. (2002, July 28). Narrative tools to improve collaborative sense-making. Workshop on meaning negociation, held in conjunction with Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence – AAAI02, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulier, E., Rousseau, F., Bugeaud, F., Legrand, J., & Neffati, H. (2011). Modeling and simulation of new territories projects using agencements theory, mereological principles and simplicial complex tool. Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart and Sustainable City (ICSSC), 06–08 Juillet 2011, Shangai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulier, E., Neffati, H., Rousseaux, F., Legrand, J., Bugeaud, F., Saurel, P., et al. (2012, July 4–6). Collective intelligence modeling throughout territorial agencements. Proceedings of 2012 EcoMod, Seville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1–2), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theureau, J. (2006). Cours d’action : Méthode développée. Toulouse: Octares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tixier, M., & Lewkowicz, M. (2011). Design and evaluation of an online social support application for family caregivers. In A. Ant Ozok & P. Zaphiris (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on online communities and social computing (OCSC’11)(pp. 267–276). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier, M., Gaglio, G., & Lewkowicz, M. (2009, May 10–13). Translating social support practices into online services for family caregivers. Proceedings of GROUP2009. Sanibel Island: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tixier, M., Lewkowicz, M., Marcoccia, M., Atifi, H., Benel, A., & Gaglio, G. (2010). Practices analysis and digital platform design – An interdisciplinary study of social support. Proceedings of COOP 2010 – 9th international conference on the design of cooperative systems, 19–21 May, Aix-en-Provence. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., & Stevens, G. (2011, March 19–23). Engaging with practices: Design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. Proceedings of CSCW 2011(pp. 505–512). Hangzhou: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacklad, M. (2005). Introduction aux ontologies sémiotiques dans le Web Socio Sémantique. In M.-C. Jaulent (Ed.), Actes des 16èmes journées francophones d’Ingénierie des Connaissances – IC’2005. Grenoble: PUG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C., Bénel, A., & Lejeune, C. (2006). Towards a standard protocol for community-driven organizations of knowledge. Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on concurrent engineering. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (Vol. 143, pp. 438–449). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouinar, M., Salembier, P., & Darcy, S. (2010). Etude exploratoire des usages d’une application mobile. Proceedings of IHM 2010, Luxembourg, 20–23 Septembre. New-York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The MISS project was funded by UTT (strategic research program grant), with the support of Conseil Général de l’Aube for the doctoral work.

Other mentioned projects benefited from various grants from the French National Research Agency (ANR) programs, Région Champagne-Ardennes, ANDRA, DGA, Orange Labs, France Telecom and EDF.

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and insightful comments. We are also grateful to Jacques Theureau for his reading and comments on an early version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myriam Lewkowicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewkowicz, M., Salembier, P. (2015). Analysing and Supporting Cooperative Practices: An Interdisciplinary Approach. In: Wulf, V., Schmidt, K., Randall, D. (eds) Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6719-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6720-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics