Skip to main content

Design, Reconfiguration, and Control of Parallel Kinematic Machines

  • Conference paper
Parallel Kinematic Machines

Part of the book series: Advanced Manufacturing ((ADVMANUF))

  • 1031 Accesses

Abstract

Parallel kinematic machines have attracted worldwide interest due to their potential in revolutionizing machine tool technology and their potential in maneuvering precisely heavy objects such as fixtures and tool holders for complex tasks in assembly and disassembly operations. Our recent research activities on parallel kinematic machines have been concentrated on the following issues. (1) The concept of vertex space was introduced to decompose complex workspace problem into simpler subproblems. Through the vertex spaces, key design parameters are analyzed, and method for determining the placement of machines and tasks are developed. (2) Design and planning issues for effective and convenient reconfiguration were studied. To assist the leg placement, the concept of foot- placement space (EPS) is introduced, and a construction method for obtaining the foot-placement space has also been developed. (3) Application of 6-dof parallel kinematic machines in machining operations leads to some unique planning and control issues. Several of them are under investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gough V E, Whitehall S G 1956–57 Universal Tyre Testing Machine. In: Proc., 9th International Technical Congress FISIA, Vol 117, pp 117–135

    Google Scholar 

  2. Merlet J-P i996 Workspace-oriented Methodology for Designing a Parallel Manipulator. In: Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, pp 3726–3731

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart D 1965-66 A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom. In: Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Vol 180, Pt 1, No 15, pp 371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Minski M 1972 Manipulator Design Vignettes. AI memo, No. 267, MIT AI Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albus J, Bostelman R, Dagalakis N 1993 The NIST ROBOCRANE. J. of Robotic Systems 10 (5): 709–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tindale J 1965-66 Discussion on the Stewart Paper. In: Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Vol 180, Pt 1, No 15, pp 383-384

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aronson R B 1997 Hexapods: Hot or Ho Hum. Manufacturing Engineering, Oct., pp 60–67

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gosselin C 1990 Determination of the Workspace of 6-DOF Parallel Manipulator. IEEE, Trans, on Robotics and Automation 6 (3): 281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gosselin C, Lavoie E, Toutant P 1992 An Efficient Algorithm for the Graphical Representation of the Three-Dimensional Workspace of Parallel Manipulators. Robotics, Spatial Mechanisms, and Mechanical Systems ASME DE-Vol. 45, pp 323–328

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang T, Whitehouse D J, Wang J S 1998 Local Dexterity, Optimal Architecture and Design Criteria of Parallel Machine Tools. CIRP Annuals 47 (1): 347–351

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar V 1990 Characterization of Workspaces of Parallel Manipulators. ASME DE-Vol. 25: 321–329

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pennock G R, Kassner D J 1991 The Workspace of a General Geometry Planar Three-Degree-of-Freedom Platform-Type Manipulator. Advances in Design Automation ASME DE-Vol. 32 (2): 537–544

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ji Z 1994 Workspace Analysis of Stewart Platforms Via Vertex Space. J. of Robotic Systems 11 (7): 631–639

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ji Z 1996 Analysis of Design Parameters in Platform Manipulators. ASME J. of Mechanical Design 118 (4): 526–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ji Z 1995 Placement Analysis for a Class of Platform Manipulators. In: Proc. of ASME Design Engineering Conferences, Vol 1, Boston, pp 773-779

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ji Z, Song P 1998 Design of a Reconfigurable Platform Manipulator. J. of Robotic Systems 15 (6): 341–346

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ji Z, Li Z 1998 Determination of Individual Foot-Placement Space for Modular Platform Manipulators. In: Proc. of DETC98, to appear

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arai T, Stoughton R, Jaya Y M 1993 Micro Hand Module using Parallel Link Mechanism. In: Proc. of Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, San Francisco, pp 163–168

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bajpai A, Roth B 1986 Workspace and Mobility of a Closed-Loop Manipulator. Int. J. of Robotics Research 5 (2): 131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen N-X Song S-M 1992 Direct Position Analysis of the 4-6 Stewart Platforms. Robotics, Spatial Mechanisms, and Mechanical Systems ASME DE- Vol. 45: 75–80

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cheok K C, Overholt J L, Beck R 1993 Exact Methods for Determining the Kinematics of a Stewart Platform Using Additional Displacement Sensors. J. of Robotic Systems 10 (5): 689–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cleary K, Arai T 1991 A Prototype Parallel Manipulator: Kinematics, Construction, Software, Workspace Results, and Singularity Analysis. In: Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp 566–571

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cleary K, Brooks T 1993 Kinematic Analysis of a Novel 6-DOF Parallel Manipulator. In: Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA., pp 708–713

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dasgupta B, Mruthyunjaya T S 1994 A Canonical Formulation of the Direct Position Kinematics Problem for a General 6-6 Stewart Platform. Mechanisms and Machine Theory 29 (6): 819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fichter E F 1986 A Stewart Platform-Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction. Int. J. of Robotics Research 5 (2): 157–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fitzgerald J M 1993 Evaluating the Stewart Platform for Manufacturing. Robotics Today 6 (1): 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gosselin C 1990 Stiffness Mapping for Parallel Manipulator. IEEE, Trans, on Robotics and Automation 6 (3): 377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gosselin C, Angeles J 1990 Singularity Analysis of Closed Loop Kinematic Chains. ASME J. of Mechanical Design 112 (3): 331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gosselin C, Ricard R, Nahon M 1995 A Comparison of Architectures of Parallel Mechanisms for Workspace and Kinematic Properties. In: Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Vol /, pp 951–958

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grace K W et al. 1993 A Six Degree of Freedom Micromanipulator for Ophthalmic Surgery. In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol 7, Atlanta, pp 630-635

    Google Scholar 

  31. Griffis M, Duffy J 1989 A Forward Displacement Analysis of a Class of Stewart Platforms. J. of Robotic Systems 6 (6): 703–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hudgens J, Tesar D 1988 A Fully-Parallel Six Degree-of-freedom Micromanipulator: Kinematic Analysis and Dynamic Model. Trends and Developments in Mechanisms, Machines and Robotics ASME DE-Vol. 15-3:29- 37

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hunt K H 1983 Structural Kinematics of In-Parallel-Actuated Robot-Arms. ASME J. of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 105: 705–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Husty M 1994 An Algorithm for Solving the Direct Kinematics of the Stewart- Gough-Type Platform. Preprint, McGill Research Center for Intelligent Machines, June

    Google Scholar 

  35. Innocenti C, Parenti-Castelli V 1992 Forward Kinematics of the General 6-6 Fully Parallel Mechanism: an Exhaustive Numerical Approach via a Mono- Dimensional-Search Algorithm. Robotics, Spatial Mechanisms, and Mechanical Systems ASME DE-Vol. 45: 545–552

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ma O, Angeles J 1991 Architecture Singularities of Parallel kinematic machines. In: Proc., IEEE Int. Conf on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA., pp 1542–1547

    Google Scholar 

  37. Masory O, Wang J 1992 Workspace Evaluation of Stewart Platforms. Robotics, Spatial Mechanisms, and Mechanical Systems ASME DE-Vol. 45: 337–346

    Google Scholar 

  38. Masory O, Wang J 1993 On the Accuracy of a Stewart Platform. In: Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, pp 114-120 and 725-731

    Google Scholar 

  39. McCallion H, Pham D T 1979 The Analysis of a Six Degree of Freedom Work Station for Mechanised Assembly. In: Proc. of the 5th World Congress on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Montreal, pp 611-616

    Google Scholar 

  40. Merlet J-P 1989 Singular Configurations of Parallel Manipulators and Grassmann Geometry. Int. J. of Robotics Research 8 (5): 45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Merlet J-P 1993 Closed-form resolution of the direct kinematics of Parallel Manipulators using Extra sensor Data. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, pp 200–204

    Google Scholar 

  42. Merlet J-P 1995 Determination of the Orientation Workspace of Parallel Manipulators. J. of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 13: 143–160

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mohamed M G, Duffy J 1985 A Direct Determination of the Instantaneous Kinematics of Fully Parallel Robot Manipulators. ASME J. of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 107: 226–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nanua P, Waldron K J, Murthy V 1989 Direct Kinematic Solution of a Stewart Platform. IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation 6 (4): 438–444

    Google Scholar 

  45. Parenti-Castelli V, Gregorio R 1995 Determination of the actual configuration of the general Stewart platform using only one additional displacement sensor. In: Proc. of ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Nov. 12- 17, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Raghavan M 1993 The Stewart Platform of General Geometry Has 40 Configurations. J. of Mechanical Design 115 (2): 277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shi X, Fenton R G 1992 Structural Instabilities in Platform-type Parallel Manipulators due to Singular Configurations. Robotics, Spatial Mechanisms, and Mechanical Systems ASME DE-Vol. 45: 347–352

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sreenivasan S V, Waldron K J 1994 Closed-form Direct Displacement Analysis of a 6-6 Stewart Platform. Mechanisms and Machine Theory 29 (6): 855–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tsai L, Tahmasebi F 1993 Synthesis and Analysis of a New Class of Six- Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulators. J. of Robotic Systems 10 (5): 561–580

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang D C H, Lee T W 1984 Feasibility Study of a Platform Type of Robotic Manipulators from a Kinematic Viewpoint. ASME J. of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 106: 191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ji, Z., Leu, M.C. (1999). Design, Reconfiguration, and Control of Parallel Kinematic Machines. In: Boër, C.R., Molinari-Tosatti, L., Smith, K.S. (eds) Parallel Kinematic Machines. Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0885-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0885-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1228-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0885-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics