Abstract
The dispensation of justice in matters per-taining to religion is always a ticklish task in secular, liberal democracies. Quite often the right to freedom of religion is at odds with secular laws, resulting in a predicament about which principle should gain prece-dence. Orthodox Jews and Sikhs, for in-stance, demand that they should be exempt from wearing the headgear in the police or military because doing so conflicts with their religious practices. Sikhs in India ar-gue that the state has no right to prevent them from boarding a plane just because they carry the traditional kripan(a small dagger), mandated by Sikhism. But the state maintains that in view of the escalating in-cidence of terrorism, it has no choice but to impose a blanket ban on all kinds of ’weapons’ that could be potentially used for hijacking. In Montreal and Paris, the ma-jority French resent the fact that Muslim schoolgirls insist on wearing the hijab(head scarf), violating the secular rules of the edu-cational system. By a similar token, the mi-norities, particularly the Muslims, take ex-ception to the Sunday holiday laws because they see a majoritarian bias in them. Why not allow us to close our shops on Fridays, they ask?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baird, R. D. (1976). Religion and the secular: Cate-gories for religious conflict and religious change in Independent India. In B. L. Smith (Ed.)Reli-gion and social conflict in south Asia.Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Bharatiya Janata Party (1996). Bharatiya Janata Party: For a strong and prosperous India.New Delhi. (1996 election manifesto)
Bharatiya Janata Party (1993). BJP’s White Paper on Ayodhya and The Rama Temple Movement.New Delhi. Communalism Combat (1995). Vol. II, no. 5, Jan.
Cossman, B. & Kapur, R. (1997). Secularism’s last sigh? The Hindu right, the courts and India’s strug-gle for democracy?Harvard International Law Journal, 38pp. 113–170.
Dhavan, R. (1987). Religious freedom in IndiaThe American Journal of Comparative Law35, 209–254.
Dhavan, R. (1996). Whither Hindutva? The HinduMarch 29.
Fuller, C. J. (1988). Hinduism and scriptural authority in modern Indian law. Journal for Comparative Study of History and Society225–248
Gajendragadkar, P. B. (1971). Secularism and the Con-stitution of India.(Kashinath Trimbak Telang Endowment Lectures) Bombay: University of Bombay.
Galanter, M. (1989). Hinduism, secularism and the In-dian judiciary. In R. Dhavan (Ed.)Law and society in modern India.New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Gopal, S. (1988). Nehru and minorities. Economic and Political WeeklyXIII, 2463–2466.
Hasan, M. (1991). Adjustment and accommodation: In-dian Muslims after partition. In K. N. Pannikar (Ed.)Communalism in India: History, politics and culture.New Delhi: Manohar Publications.
India Today.(1997). Dec. 29.
Judgements Today.(1994). Vol. 2 (8), March 21.
Kymlicka, W. (1995).Multicultural citizenship: A lib-eral theory of minority rights.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Majumdar, P. K. & Kataria, R. P. (1996).The Constitu-tion of India(eighth edition). New Delhi: Orient Publishing House.
Masselos, J. (1994). The Bombay riots of January 1993: The politics of urban conflagration.South AsiaXVII, 79–95.
Moog, R. S. (1998). Elite-court relations in India: An unsatisfactory arrangement.Asian SurveyXXXVIII, 410–423.
Nariman, F. S. (1996a). Secular norms-I: Hin-dutva and all that.The StatesmanNew Delhi, January 15.
Nâriman, F. S. (1996b). Secular norms-II: Sway-ing the electorate.The StatesmanNew Delhi, January 16.
Nariman, F. S. (1995). Where then, O Lord shall we turn?Communalism CombatII, January, pp. 2.
Nauriya, A. (1996). The Hindutva judgements: A warning signal.Economic and Political WeeklyJanuary 6, 10–13.
Noorani, A. G. (1996). On ’a way of life’: Hindutva judicially licensed.FrontlineJanuary 26, 122–124.
Palkhivala, N. A. (1996). India remains secular: Full bench needed to end confusion.Times of IndiaBombay, February 5.
Pandey, G. (1991). Hindus and others: The mili-tant Hindu construction.Economic and Political Weeklyno. 26, 2997–3009.
Rahman, T. (1999). The politics of Urdu in India.Joun- ral of South Asian and Middle Eastern StudiesXXII, 38–60.
Rao, P. T. (1996). SC clarifies Hindutva ruling.The HinduMadras, March 23.
Rao, P. P. (1995). Verdict requires reconsideration.Ra-diance WeeklyDecember 24, 8–9.
Russell, R. (1999). Urdu in India since independence.Economic and Political Weekly, XXXIV, January 9, 44–48.
Sathe, S. P. (1968). Secularism and law. In V. K. Sinha (Ed.)Secularism in India.Bombay: Lalvani Pub-lishing House.
Sathe, S. P. (1996). Secularism and the Supreme Court of India.Lawyers CollectiveAugust, 4–12.
Sebastian, P. A. (1993). People’s commission report on Bombay riots. Economic and Political WeeklyOct. 16, 2256–2257.
Seervai, H. M. (1995). SC should recall its order.Com-munalism CombatII, January, 2–12.
Smith, D. E. (1963).India as a secular state.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sorabjee, S. J. (1995a). Constitution, secularism and freedom of religion.Towards secular India, 1, April-June, 61–66.
Sorabjee, S. J. (1995b). Appeal to religion: The Supreme Court’s view.Indian ExpressBombay, December 18.
Supreme Court Cases.(1994). Vol. 6. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.
Supreme Court Cases.(1996). Vol. 1. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.
Suresh, V. & Nagasaila, D. (1992). Is it unsecular to invoke the Gayatri Mantra?The PioneerDelhi, December 1.
Tarkunde, V. M. (1996). Hindutva and the Supreme Court.Hindustan TimesNew Delhi, March 10.
The Gazette of India.(1998). Part II, Section I, no. 191, April 24.
White Paper on Ayodhya.(1993). New Delhi: Govern-ment of India.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rao, B. (2004). Religion, Law, and Minorities in India. In: Richardson, J.T. (eds) Regulating Religion. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9094-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9094-5_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47887-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9094-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive