Abstract
The advent of the Internet has led to a sizeable increase in the number of options from which humans can choose, in such evolutionarily important domains as housing, food and mates . The level of choice and the amount of information seen on the Internet are well beyond that which would have been found in our ancestral choice environment ; so how does it impact our decisions? We describe the results of two experiments in which we examine the influence of increasing online mate choice on expected and experienced choice-related affect and cognitions. In Study 1, participants merely expecting an increasing choice of mates believed they would enjoy choosing more from these sets and would have greater satisfaction and less regret with their chosen partner (vs. when they expected to face limited choice), but only up to a point. On the other hand, participants in Study 2 who experienced a supposedly ideal number of potential mates from whom to choose did not have enhanced feelings about the choice process and person selected than did participants experiencing a more limited number of options. Furthermore, the results indicated that having more choice may lead to memory confusion . Together, these studies suggest that while participants anticipate that increasing choice may ultimately yield more downsides than upsides, they underestimate how quickly increasing choice can become overwhelming. We propose that these results may be understood best within the context of an evolutionary–cognitive framework . The chapter concludes by discussing why the error in anticipation may be difficult to overcome and, further, how the design of dating Web sites could be improved, given people’s expectations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As determined by individual t-tests, not included here; details available upon request.
References
Bargh JA, McKenna KYA (2004) The internet and social life. Annu Rev Psychol 55:573–590
Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–169
Brym R, Lenton R (2004) Love at first byte: internet dating in Canada. In: Brym R (ed) Society in question: sociological readings for the 21st century, 4th edn. Nelson, Toronto
Buss DM (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav Brain Sci 12(1):1–49
Buss DM, Barnes ML (1986) Preferences in human mate selection. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(3):559–570
Buss DM, Schmitt DP (1993) Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev 100(2):204–232
Buston PM, Emlen ST (2003) Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: the relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(15):8805–8810
Chernev A (2003) Product assortment and individual decision processes. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(1):151–162
Dhar R (1997) Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J Consum Res 24(2):215–231
DiClemente DF, Hantula DA (2003) Optimal foraging online: increasing sensitivity to delay. Psychol Market 20(9):785–809
Dunbar RIM (1992) Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J Hum Evol 22(6):469–493
Eaton SB, Konner M, Shostak M (1988) Stone agers in the fast lane: chronic degenerative diseases in evolutionary perspective. Am J Med 84(4):739–749
Edwards W, Fasolo B (2001) Decision technology. Annu Rev Psychol 52:581–606
Fasolo B, McClelland GH, Todd PM (2007) Escaping the tyranny of choice: when fewer attributes make choice easier. Market Theory 7(1):13–26
Fiore AT, Donath JS (2005) Homophily in online dating: when do you like someone like yourself? Paper presented at the 2005 computer–human interaction conference, Portland, Oregon. http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/~atf/papers/fiore_chi2005_short.pdf. Retrieved 28 May 2007
Gerhardt HC (1987) Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Anim Behav 35(5):1479–1489
Gerhardt HC, Klump GM (1988) Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: a limitation on mate choice. Anim Behav 36(4):1247–1249
Gilbert DT, Wilson TD (2000) Miswanting: some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In: Forgas J (ed) Thinking and feeling: the role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Grinde B (2002) Darwinian unhappiness: evolution as a guide for living and understanding human behavior. Darwin Press, Princeton
Halford G, Baker R, McCredden JE, Bain JD (2005) How many variables can humans process? Psychol Sci 16(1):70–76
Hahn M, Lawson R, Young G (1992) The effects of time pressure and information load on decision quality. Psychol Market 9(5):365–379
Haixia P (2005 Oct. 24) 5,000 turn up at ‘meet and mate’ mega event. ChinaDaily.com. Retrieved 11 January 2006
Hutchinson JMC (2005) Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment. Biol Rev 80(1):73–92
Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 79(6):995–1006
Jacoby J, Speller DE, Kohn CA (1974) Brand choice behavior as a function of information overload. J Market Res 11(1):63–69
Johnstone RA, Earn DJD (1999) Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45(3–4):277–281
Kahn BE, Wansink B (2004) The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. J Consum Res 30(4):519–533
Kahneman D (1994) New challenges to the rationality assumption. J Inst Theor Econ 150(1):18–36
Klaaren KJ, Hodges SD, Wilson TD (1994) The role of affective expectations in subjective experience and decision-making. Soc Cogn 12(2):77–101
Kock N (2005) Media richness or media naturalness: the evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward e-communication tools. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 48(2):117–130
Kokko H, Sutherland WJ, Lindström J, Reynolds JD, Mackenzie A (1998) Individual mating success, lek stability, and the neglected limitations of statistical power. Anim Behav 56(3):755–762
Langer EJ, Rodin J (1976) The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol 34(2):191–198
Lenton AP, Bryan A, Hastie R, Fischer O (2007) We want the same thing: projection in judgments of sexual intent. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33(7):975–988
Lenton AP, Fasolo B, Todd PM (2009) The relationship between number of potential mates and mating skew in humans. Anim Behav 77(1):55–60
Lenton AP, Stewart A (2008) Changing her ways: number of options and mate standard strength impact mate choice strategy and satisfaction. Judgm Decis Mak 3(7):501–511
Manasian D (2003) Digital dilemmas: a survey of the Internet society. Economist 25:1–26
Match.com (2004) Match.com Corporate. From Web site: http://corp.match.com/index/cs_index.aspx. Retrieved 20 September 2004
Miller GF (1997) Mate choice: from sexual cues to cognitive adaptations. In: Cardew G (ed) Characterizing human psychological adaptations, Ciba Foundation symposium 208. John Wiley, New York, pp 71–87
Miller GF, Todd PM (1998) Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends Cogn Sci 2(5):190–198
Nesse RM, Williams GC (1994) Evolution and healing: the new science of Darwinian medicine. Phoenix, London
Penke L, Todd PM, Lenton AP, Fasolo B (2007) How self-assessments can guide human mating decisions. In: Geher G, Miller G (eds) Mating intelligence: sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp. 37–76
Peplau LA (2003) Human sexuality: how do men and women differ? Curr Dir Psychol Res 12(2):37–40
Pirolli P, Card S (1999) Information foraging. Psychol Rev 106(4):643–675
Saad G (2007) The evolutionary bases of consumption. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
Saad G, Gill T (2000) Applications of evolutionary psychology in marketing. Psychol Market 17(12):1005–1034
Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM (2009) What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychol Market 26(3):229–253
Schwartz B (2004) The paradox of choice: why more is less. Harper-Collins, New York
Schwartz B, Ward A, Monterosso J, Lyubomirsky S, White K, Lehman D (2002) Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. J Pers Soc Psychol 83(5):1178–1197
Shah AM, Wolford G (2007) Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychol Sci 18(5):369–370
Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118
Speeddater.co.uk (n.d.) Frequently asked questions. From Web site: http://speeddater.co.uk/faq/viewfaq.cfm?ID=4. Retrieved 20 September 2004
Speedmatching.com (2004) Online speedmatching. From Web site: http://online.speedmatching.com/. Retrieved 20 September 2004
Stenstrom E, Stenstrom P, Saad G, Cheikhrouhou S (2007) Online hunting and gathering: an evolutionary perspective on sex differences in website preferences and navigation. IEEE Trans Prof Commun Darwinian Perspect Commun 51(2):155–168 (special issue)
Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York
US Census Bureau (2002) Survey of income and program participation. From Web site: http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/marital-hist/p70-80/tab01.pdf. Retrieved 2 September 2004
Whitty M, Gavin J (2001) Age/sex/location: uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. Cyberpsychol Behav 4(5):623–630
Zahedi FM, Van Pelt WJ, Song J (2001) A conceptual framework for international web design. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 44(2):83–103
Zuckerman M, Porac J, Lathin D, Smith R, Deci EL (1978) On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 4(3):443–446
Acknowledgments
This chapter is a revised version of an article by the authors published in 2008 in the journal IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. The authors would like to thank their research assistants for help with data collection (Thea Loch, St John Haw, Albina Shayevich, Martin Bruder, and Joshua Mora) and Kim S. Campbell and Ned Kock for their suggestions in connection with the previous version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lenton, A.P., Fasolo, B., Todd, P.M. (2010). Who Is in Your Shopping Cart? Expected and Experienced Effects of Choice Abundance in the Online Dating Context. In: Kock, N. (eds) Evolutionary Psychology and Information Systems Research. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 24. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6138-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6139-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)