Abstract
One-to-one technology classrooms equip each child with a computing device that provides personalised learning tools. One-to-one learning is showing promise in classrooms due to support for individual and small group learning through the affordances of mobile learning devices such as portability, low cost and communication features. However, there are problems of management of the technology-enabled classroom, lack of support for collaborative and whole class working, design of lessons that switch easily between activities, and difficulty in re-use of lesson components. In this chapter we describe the SceDer system to orchestrate learning with one-to-one technologies. Sceder provides an authoring system for teachers to design lessons, an interchange language (COML) to describe lesson sequences and resources, and a delivery system that enables the teacher to manage collaborative one-to-one learning in the classroom. The system has been tested in school classrooms and has demonstrated its effectiveness in managing fluid transitions between individual, group, and whole class learning activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Wright, M., Martin, H., Ainsworth, S., Benford, S., et al. (2008). Learning 21st century science in context with mobile technologies. In B. C. Traxler John. Riordan (Ed.), Mlearn 2008 conference (pp. 12–19).
Asensio-Pérez, J., Bote-Lorenzo, M., Vega-Gorgojo, G., Dimitriadis, Y., Gómez-Sánchez, E., & Villasclaras-Fernández, E. (2008). Adding mash-up based tailorability to VLEs for scripted collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on mash-up personal learning environments(mupple08) (Vol. 388, pp. 14–17).
Britain, S. (2004). A review of learning design: Concept, specifications and tools. JISC report, 20.
Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, K., Sharples, M., Brown, T., et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1, 3–29.
Dalziel, J. (2003). Implementing learning design: The learning activity anagement system (LAMS). In Proceedings of the ascilite 2003 conference, Adelaide (p. 25).
Dalziel, J. R. (2006). Lessons from LAMS for IMS learning design. In Sixth international conference on advanced learning technologies (p. 1101–1102).
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dillenbourg, P., & Crivelli, Z. (2009). A model of collaborative learning scripts instantiated with mobile technologies. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 36–48.
Ferraris, C., Martel, C., & Vignollet, L. (2007). LDL for collaborative activities. In L. Botturi & T. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of visual languages in instructional design: Theories and practices (pp. 226–253). Hershey, PA: Idea Group. Chapter XII.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (Vol. 6). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Giemza, A., Weinbrenner, S., Engler, J., & Hoppe, H. U. (2007). Tuple spaces as a flexible integration platform for distributed learning environments. Supporting Learning Flow Through Integrative Tech-nologies, 313-320.
Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fern_andez, E., JarrÃn-Abellán, I., Asensio-Pérez, J., Dimitriadis, Y., Ruiz-Requies, I., et al. (2006). COLLAGE, a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 58–71.
Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (1999). An analysis of learner arguments in a collective learning environment. In Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning.
Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 211–224.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.
Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (2005). Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. Netherlands: Springer.
Koschmann, T. (1996). CSCL, theory and practice of an emerging paradigm: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Laurillard, D., Oliver, M., Wasson, B., & Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing Technology-Enhanced learning. Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products, 289–306.
Liu, T. C., Liang, J. K., Wang, H. Y., Chan, T. W., & Wei, L. H. (2003). Embedding educlick in classroom to enhance interaction. In Proceedings of international conference on computers in education (ICCE) (p. 117–125).
Lowery, R. C. (2005). Teaching and learning with interactive student response systems: A comparison of commercial products in the higher education market. In Annual meeting of the southwestern social science association and its affiliates, march (p. 2326).
Miao, Y., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, H. U., & Harrer, A. (2005). CSCL scripts: Modelling features and potential use. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 423–432). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature review in mobile technologies and learning. A Report for NESTA Futurelab. ISBN: 0–9548594.
Niramitranon, J., Sharples, M., & Greenhalgh, C. (2006). COML (Classroom orchestration modelling language) and scenarios designer: Toolsets to facilitate collaborative learning in a One-to-One technology classroom. Selected Papers from the Kaleidoscope Convergence Workshop: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niramitranon, J., Sharples, M., & Greenhalgh, C. (2009) (Paper accepted). Designing and orchestrating collaborative learning in a one-to- one classroom. In The 17th international conference on computers in education, ICCE 2009, Hongkong.
Niramitranon, J., Sharples, M., Greenhalgh, C., & Lin, C. (2007). SceDer and COML: Toolsets for learning design and facilitation in one-to- one technology classroom. In U. S. Hirashima T.Hoppe (Eds.), ICCE'07 (pp. 385–391). Netherlands: IOS Press.
Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52(1), 147–153.
Pinkwart, N., Hoppe, H. U., Milrad, M., & Perez, J. (2003). Educational scenarios for cooperative use of personal digital assistants. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 383–391.
Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL. In Proceedings of CSCL (Vol. 2) Boulder, CO.
Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Estrella, G., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2009). From handheld collaborative tool to effective classroom module: Embedding CSCL in a broader design framework. In Proceedings of computer supported collaborative learning practices (pp. 395–403). Rhodes, Greece: ISLS.
Roschelle, J., Schank, P., Brecht, J., Tatar, D., & Chaudhury, S. R. (2005). From response systems to distributed systems for enhanced collaborative learning. In Proceeding of the 13th international conference on computers in education (ICCE 2005) (pp. 363–370).
Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Chaudbury, S. R., Dimitriadis, Y., Patton, C., DiGiano, C., et al. (2007). Ink, improvisation, and interactive engagement: Learning with tablets. Computer, 40(9), 42–48.
Sharples, M. (2000, April). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34(3–4), 177–193.
van Es, R., & Koper, R. (2006). Testing the pedagogical expressiveness of IMS LD. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 229.
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 130.
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Mcscl: Mobile computer supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 42(3), 289–314.
Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Shaples, M. (2003). Encouraging face-to-face collaborative learning through the use of handheld computers in the classroom. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 193–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niramitranon, J., Sharples, M., Greenhalgh, C. (2010). Orchestrating Learning in a One-to-One Technology Classroom. In: Khine, M., Saleh, I. (eds) New Science of Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5715-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5716-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)