Skip to main content

Fostering Higher Levels of Learning Using Diverse Instructional Strategies with Internet Communication Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Science of Learning

Abstract

This chapter provides an evidence-based overview of pedagogical strategies that facilitate active and engaged learning through the use of diverse and innovative instructional strategies using text-based Internet communication tools. Research has shown that some pedagogical interventions can be effective at achieving higher levels of learning and thinking in using Internet communication tools. Pedagogical interventions explored in this chapter include the following instructional methods: debates, invited guests, reflective deliberation, webquests, and nominal group technique – all using text-based Internet group communication tools. The results drawn from this study reveal that webquests and debates are the most effective pedagogical interventions at moving students toward achieving higher levels of learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Aviv, G. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to email. How written English evolved and where it’s heading. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. (1954). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology: Theory and method (Vol. 1, pp. 488–522). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M., de Rubalcava, B. R., & St-Pierre, D. (2000). Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research. Distance Education, 21(2), 260–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C. J., & Reynolds, T. H. (1997). Learner-centered Web instruction for higher-order thinking, teamwork, and apprenticeship. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based Instruction (pp. 167–178). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: APA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, D., Kanuka, H., Blanchette, J., & Goodale, C. (1999). Learning technologies in distance education. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castell, S., Bryson, M., & Jenson, J. (2002). Object lessons: Towards an educational theory of technology. First Monday, 7(1). Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_1/castell/index.html

  • Dodge, B. (1995, 1997). Some thoughts about Webquests. Retrieved January 5, 2004, from http://edWeb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec596/about_Webquests.html.

  • Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., Ally, M., Cookson, P., Keller, V., & Prosser, F. (2000). The development and testing of a tool for analysis of computer mediated conferencing transcripts. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C., Carabajal, K., & Lowe, C. A. (2001). Critical analysis of models and methods used to evaluate online learning networks. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456159).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E., & Feenberg, A. (2005). The technical codes of online education. Techné, 9 (1), 97-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(3). Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/kanuka.html.

  • Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). On-line social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H., & Kreber, C. (1999). Knowledge construction in the virtual classroom. Proceedings of the Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education, June, 1999, Sherbrooke, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwook, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvalseth, T. O. (1989). Note on Cohen’s Kappa. Psychological Reports, 65, 223–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, C. A., & Merseth, K. K. (1993). Cases, hypermedia and computer networks: Three curricular innovations for teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(6), 543–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, A. (1991). Some guidelines for the design of effective hypercourses. Educational Technology, 31(10), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G. M., Reynolds, R. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (2002), Enhancing the quality of on-line discussions. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. F. (1995). Online report on pedagogical techniques for computer-mediated communication. Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http://www.nettskolen.com/pub/artikkel.xsql?artid=123.

  • Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. -F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119–140. [online]. Retrieved December 16, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pawan/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, P. (1999). The art of teaching adults: How to become an exceptional instructor and facilitator. Vancouver, BC: The Training Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L. (2005). Learning Through Online Discussion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 14(21), 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating. The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, D. F., & Fellenz, R. A. (1989). Effective strategies for teaching adults. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, S. G. (1997). Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 12(3), 227–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., & Austin, J. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory investigation. Learning and Instruction, 11, 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning with incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2002). Learning on-line: A review of recent literature in a rapidly expanding field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(3), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, C., & Feenberg, A. (2005). Pedagogy in cyberspace: The dynamics of online discussion. Special studies of the ACT Lab. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation reason and order versus deindividuation impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Kanuka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kanuka, H. (2010). Fostering Higher Levels of Learning Using Diverse Instructional Strategies with Internet Communication Tools. In: Khine, M., Saleh, I. (eds) New Science of Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics