Skip to main content

Optimizing the Biofuels Infrastructure: Transportation Networks and Biorefinery Locations in Illinois

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 33))

Abstract

Growing biofuel mandates pose considerable challenges to the infrastructure needed across all stages of the supply chain − from crop production, feedstock harvesting, storage, transportation, and processing to biofuel distribution and use. This chapter focuses on the biofuel transportation and distribution network infrastructure, using Illinois as a case study. Building on an optimal land use allocation model for feedstock production, a mathematical programming model is used to determine optimal locations and capacities of biorefineries, delivery of bioenergy crops to biorefineries, and processing and distribution of ethanol and co-products (DDGS). The model aims to minimize total system costs in a multiyear planning horizon for the period of 2007–2022. Certain locations may be more suitable for corn and corn stover-based ethanol plants, others more for producing ethanol using perennial grasses (miscanthus)

Authors’ names are listed in alphabetical order, seniority of authorship is not assigned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the color of each county indicates the total amount of biomass production, not the density.

  2. 2.

    The number of refineries is actually the number of counties having at least one refinery. Some counties have multiple refineries, such as Peoria and Tazewell.

References

  • API (2008) “Shipping Ethanol Through Pipelines.” American Petroleum Institute. Available at http://www.api.org/aboutoilgas/sectors/pipeline/upload/pipelineethanolshipment-2.doc. Accessed on May 15, 2009.

  • Babcock BA, Hayes DJ and Lawrence JD (eds) (2008) “Using Distillers Grains in the U.S. and International Livestock and Poultry Industries,” Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brat I and Machalaba D (2007) “Can Ethanol Get a Ticket to Ride?,” The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 1, p. B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Orwig E, Nemeth J and Subietta Rocha C (2007) “Economic potential for ethanol expansion in Illinois”, Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs at Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRS (2007) “Ethanol and Other Biofuels-Potential for U.S.-Brazil Energy Cooperation.” Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB and Thapa MN (2003) Linear Programming: Theory and Extensions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskin MS (1995) Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Torre Ugarte DG and Ray DE (2000) “Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework.” Biomass and Bioenergy 18: 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra EW (1959) “A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs.” Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley FJ, Cox M and Cox L (2008) “Distillers Grain Handbook: A Guide for Indiana Producers to Using DDGS for Animal Feed”, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, http://incorn.org/images/stories/IndianaDDGSHandbook.pdf. Accessed on May 15, 2009.

  • Drezner Z (1995) Facility Location. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eathington L and Swenson DA (2007) “Dude, Where's My Corn? Constraints on the Location of Ethanol Production in the Corn Belt.” Department of Economics, Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinger P (2008) Ethanol Plant Simulator. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • English B, Short C and Heady EO (1981) “The Economic Feasibility of Crop Residues as Auxiliary Fuel in Coal-Fired Power Plants.” Am J Agri Econ 63(4): 636–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller SW, Randolph P and Klingman D (1976) “Optimizing Subindustry Marketing Organizations: A Network Analysis Approach.” Am J Agri Econ 58(3): 425–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GAO (2007) “Biofuels: DOE Lacks a Strategic Approach to Coordinate Increasing Production with Infrastructure Development and Vehicle Needs”, U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-07-713, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess JR, Wright CT and Kenney KLK (2007) “Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production.” Biofuels, Bioproducts Biorefining 1(3): 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilger DA, McCarl BA and Uhrig JW (1977) “Facilities Location: The Case of Grain Subterminals.” Am J Agri Econ 59(4): 674–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamm B, Gruber PR and Kamm M, eds. (2005) Biorefineries. Biobased Industrial Processes and Products, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaylen M, Van Dyne DL, Choi YS and Blasé M (2000) “Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks.” Bioresource Tech 72: 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Dhungana B and Clifton-Brown J (2008) “Costs of producing Miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois.” Biomass and Bioenergy 32(6): 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Önal H, Chen X and Huang H (2009) “Meeting Biofuels Targets: Implications for Land Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Nitrogen Use in Illinois.” See Chapter 17 in this book.

  • Kim Y, Mosier NS, Hendrickson R, et al. (2008) “Composition of corn dry-grind ethanol by-products: DDGS, wet cake, and thin stillage”. Bioresource Tech 99(12):5165–5176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Sokhansanj S and Flynn PC (2006) “Development of a Multicriteria Assessment Model for Ranking Biomass Feedstock Collection and Transportation Systems.” Proceedings of 27th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmudi H, Flynn PC and Checkel MD (2005) “Life Cycle Analysis of Biomass Transportation: Trains vs. Trucks.” SAE Technical Papers, http://www.sae.org/technical/papers/2005-01-1551. Accessed on May 15, 2009.

  • Mahmudi H and Flynn P (2006) “Rail vs Truck Transport of Biomass.” Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129(1): 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapemba LD (2005) “Cost to Deliver Lignocellulosic Biomass to a Biorefinery.” Ph.D Dissertation, Oklahoma State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapemba LD, Epplin M, Taliaferro CM and Huhnke RL (2007) “Biorefinery Feedstock Production on Conservation Reserve Program Land.” Rev Agri Econ 29(2): 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow WR, Griffin WM and Matthews HS (2006) “Modeling Switchgrass Derived Cellulosic Ethanol Distribution in the United States.” Environ Sci Technol 40(9): 2877–2886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nienow S, McNamara KT and Gillespie AR (2000) “Assessing plantation biomass for co-firing with coal in northern Indiana: A linear programming approach.“ Biomass Bioenergy 18: 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NREL (2007) “A National Laboratory Market and Technology Assessment of the 30x30 Scenario”, National Renewable Energy Lab, Technical Report/TP-510-40942, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso T, Baker L and Thomassin PJ (1998) “The Siting of Ethanol Plants in Quebec.” Can J Region Sci 21(1): 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • RFA (2008) “Industry Statistics”, Renewable Fuel Association, accessed 28 November 2008, http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/locations. Accessed on May 15, 2009.

  • Scheffran J and Bendor T (2009) “Bioenergy and Land Use – A Spatial-Agent Dynamic Model of Energy Crop Production in Illinois.” Int J Environ Pollution: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh V, Johnston D, Naidu K, Rausch KD, Belyea RL and Tumbleson ME (2004) Effect of modified dry grind corn processes on fermentation characteristics and ddgs composition. Proceedings of the Corn Utilization & Technology Conference, Indianapolis, IN. June 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Kumar A and Turhollow AF (2006) “Development and implementation of integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics model (IBSAL).” Biomass Bioenergy 30(10): 838–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S.EPA (2007) “Renewable Fuel Standard Implementation.” Available at: http://www.epa.gov/OTAQ/renewablefuels/index.htm. Accessed on May 15, 2009.

  • Tembo G, Epplin FM and Huhnke RL (2003) “Integrative investment appraisal of a lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol industry.” J Agri Res Econ 28(3): 611–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tursun D, Kang S, Onal H, Ouyang Y and Scheffran J (2009) “Optimum Biorefinery Locations and Transportation Network for the Future Biofuels Industry in Illinois.”: In: M. Khanna (ed.), Transition to a Bioeconomy: Environmental and Rural Development Impacts, Proceedings of Farm Foundation/USDA Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, October 15–16, 2008, Farm Foundation, Oak Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace R, Ibsen K, McAloon A and Yee W (2005) “Feasibility Study for Co-Locating and Integrating Ethanol Production Plants from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks.” NREL/TP-510-37092 Revised January Edition: USDA/USDOE/NREL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch (2006) “Biofuels for Transportation, Global Potential and Implications for Sustainable Agriculture and Energy in the 21st Century”, Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H and Galvez A (1999) “Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol – Process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis – Current and futuristic scenarios”. Report No. TP-580-26157, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright M and Brown RC (2007) “Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1(3): 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seungmo Kang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kang, S., Önal, H., Ouyang, Y., Scheffran, J., Tursun, Ü.D. (2010). Optimizing the Biofuels Infrastructure: Transportation Networks and Biorefinery Locations in Illinois. In: Khanna, M., Scheffran, J., Zilberman, D. (eds) Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 33. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0369-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0369-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0368-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0369-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics