Skip to main content

Using Soil and Groundwater Data to Understand Resistivity Surveys over a Simulated Clandestine Grave

  • Chapter

Abstract

Geophysical electrical resistivity surveys have been used in a number of attempts to locate clandestine ‘shallow’ graves, based on the valid assumption that a grave may represent a contrast in the electrical properties of the ground compared to ‘background’ values. However, the exact causes of measurable geophysical signals associated with graves are not well understood, particularly for electrical methods. In this study, soil and groundwater samples have been obtained from a simulated grave containing a domestic pig (Sus domestica) carcass, in order to better understand how the presence of a grave may influence the bulk electrical properties of the soil. This information is used to explain observations based on repeat resistivity surveys over a period of 6 months over a second simulated grave at the same site. An area of low resistivity values was observed at the grave location in the survey data obtained from 4 to 20 weeks post-burial, with the grave being difficult to identify in survey data collected outside of this interval. The low resistivity grave anomaly appeared to be caused by highly conductive fluids released by the actively decomposing carcass and this is consistent with the relatively short timescale during which the grave was detectable. It is then suggested that the most appropriate time to use resistivity surveys in the search for a grave is during the period in which the cadaver is most likely to be undergoing active decomposition. However, other authors have observed low resistivity anomalies over much older graves and it is possible that, for graves in different environments, other factors may contribute to a detectable change in the bulk electrical properties of the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archie GE (1942). The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Mineralogical Engineers 146:54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes GE (2000). Soil Mechanics: Principles and Practices, 2nd edition. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck SC (2003). Searching for graves using geophysical technology: field tests with ground penetrating radar, magnetometry and electrical resistivity. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48:5–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DO, Yellowlees D and Tibbett M (2007). Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 94:12–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheetham P (2005). Forensic geophysical survey. In: Forensic Archaeology: Advances in Theory and Practice (Eds. J Hunter and M Cox), pp. 62–95. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drever JI (1982). The Geochemistry of Natural Waters. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, Lindemann JW, Davenport GC, Trammell V, Armbrust CT, Kondratieff B, Nelson A, Castellano K and Hopkins D (1992). A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. Journal of Forensic Sciences 37:1445–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland RS, Yoder RE, Miller ME and Koppenjan SK (2002). Forensic application of sweep-frequency and impulse GPR. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (Eds. SK Koppenjan and H Lee), pp. 533–538. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman SP (2005). Soil properties influencing electrical conductivity: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46:45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillel D (1980). Fundamentals of Soil Physics. Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintze J (2001). NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. NCSS Systems, Kaysville, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller ML, Freeland RS and Koppenjan SK (2002). Searching for concealed human remains using GPR imaging of decomposition. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (Eds. SK Koppenjan and H Lee), pp. 539–544. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobes DC (2000). The search for “Yvonne”: a case example of the delineation of a grave using near-surface geophysical methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences 45:715–721.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Cassella, JP and Cassidy NJ (2008). Time lapse geophysical investigations over a simulated urban clandestine grave. Journal of Forensic Sciences 53 DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00884.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JM (1997). An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A (2005). Searching for the IRA “disappeared”: ground penetrating radar investigation of a churchyard burial site, Northern Ireland. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50:1430–1435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JJ (2008). Sequential monitoring of burials containing small pig cadavers using ground penetrating radar. Journal of Forensic Sciences 53:279–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JJ, Collins ME and Falsetti AB (2006). Sequential monitoring of burials containing large pig cadavers using ground-penetrating radar. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51:607–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JJ, Falsetti AB and Collins ME (2002). The detection of forensic burials in Florida using GPR. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (Eds. SK Koppenjan and H Lee), pp. 443–448. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J and Hunter JR (2004). Environmental influences on resistivity mapping for the location of clandestine graves. In: Forensic Geoscience: Principles, Techniques and Applications (Eds. K Pye and DJ Croft), pp. 33–38. The Geological Society of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WHF and Wessel P (1990). Gridding with continuous curvature splines in tension. Geophysics 55:293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner B and Wiltshire P (1999). Experimental validation of forensic evidence: a study of the decomposition of buried pigs in a heavy clay soil. Forensic Science International 101:113–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vass AA, Bass WM, Wolt, JD, Foss, JE and Ammons, JT (1992). Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. Journal of Forensic Sciences 37:1236–1253.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner RM (2008). Applied Statistics: From Bivariate Through Multivariate Techniques. Sage, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AS, Janaway RC, Holland AD, Dodson HI, Baran E, Pollard AM and Tobin DJ (2007). Modelling the buried body environment in upland climes using three contrasting field sites. Forensic Science International 169:6–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Jervis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jervis, J.R., Pringle, J.K., Cassella, J.P., Tuckwell, G. (2009). Using Soil and Groundwater Data to Understand Resistivity Surveys over a Simulated Clandestine Grave. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L., Miller, D. (eds) Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics