Abstract
Geophysical electrical resistivity surveys have been used in a number of attempts to locate clandestine ‘shallow’ graves, based on the valid assumption that a grave may represent a contrast in the electrical properties of the ground compared to ‘background’ values. However, the exact causes of measurable geophysical signals associated with graves are not well understood, particularly for electrical methods. In this study, soil and groundwater samples have been obtained from a simulated grave containing a domestic pig (Sus domestica) carcass, in order to better understand how the presence of a grave may influence the bulk electrical properties of the soil. This information is used to explain observations based on repeat resistivity surveys over a period of 6 months over a second simulated grave at the same site. An area of low resistivity values was observed at the grave location in the survey data obtained from 4 to 20 weeks post-burial, with the grave being difficult to identify in survey data collected outside of this interval. The low resistivity grave anomaly appeared to be caused by highly conductive fluids released by the actively decomposing carcass and this is consistent with the relatively short timescale during which the grave was detectable. It is then suggested that the most appropriate time to use resistivity surveys in the search for a grave is during the period in which the cadaver is most likely to be undergoing active decomposition. However, other authors have observed low resistivity anomalies over much older graves and it is possible that, for graves in different environments, other factors may contribute to a detectable change in the bulk electrical properties of the soil.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Archie GE (1942). The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Mineralogical Engineers 146:54–62.
Barnes GE (2000). Soil Mechanics: Principles and Practices, 2nd edition. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Buck SC (2003). Searching for graves using geophysical technology: field tests with ground penetrating radar, magnetometry and electrical resistivity. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48:5–11.
Carter DO, Yellowlees D and Tibbett M (2007). Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 94:12–24.
Cheetham P (2005). Forensic geophysical survey. In: Forensic Archaeology: Advances in Theory and Practice (Eds. J Hunter and M Cox), pp. 62–95. Routledge, London.
Drever JI (1982). The Geochemistry of Natural Waters. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, Lindemann JW, Davenport GC, Trammell V, Armbrust CT, Kondratieff B, Nelson A, Castellano K and Hopkins D (1992). A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. Journal of Forensic Sciences 37:1445–1458.
Freeland RS, Yoder RE, Miller ME and Koppenjan SK (2002). Forensic application of sweep-frequency and impulse GPR. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (Eds. SK Koppenjan and H Lee), pp. 533–538. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham.
Friedman SP (2005). Soil properties influencing electrical conductivity: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46:45–70.
Hillel D (1980). Fundamentals of Soil Physics. Academic, London.
Hintze J (2001). NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. NCSS Systems, Kaysville, UT.
Miller ML, Freeland RS and Koppenjan SK (2002). Searching for concealed human remains using GPR imaging of decomposition. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (Eds. SK Koppenjan and H Lee), pp. 539–544. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham.
Nobes DC (2000). The search for “Yvonne”: a case example of the delineation of a grave using near-surface geophysical methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences 45:715–721.
Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Cassella, JP and Cassidy NJ (2008). Time lapse geophysical investigations over a simulated urban clandestine grave. Journal of Forensic Sciences 53 DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00884.x
Reynolds JM (1997). An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. Wiley, Chichester.
Ruffell A (2005). Searching for the IRA “disappeared”: ground penetrating radar investigation of a churchyard burial site, Northern Ireland. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50:1430–1435.
Schultz JJ (2008). Sequential monitoring of burials containing small pig cadavers using ground penetrating radar. Journal of Forensic Sciences 53:279–287.
Schultz JJ, Collins ME and Falsetti AB (2006). Sequential monitoring of burials containing large pig cadavers using ground-penetrating radar. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51:607–616.
Schultz JJ, Falsetti AB and Collins ME (2002). The detection of forensic burials in Florida using GPR. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (Eds. SK Koppenjan and H Lee), pp. 443–448. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham.
Scott J and Hunter JR (2004). Environmental influences on resistivity mapping for the location of clandestine graves. In: Forensic Geoscience: Principles, Techniques and Applications (Eds. K Pye and DJ Croft), pp. 33–38. The Geological Society of London, London.
Smith WHF and Wessel P (1990). Gridding with continuous curvature splines in tension. Geophysics 55:293–305.
Turner B and Wiltshire P (1999). Experimental validation of forensic evidence: a study of the decomposition of buried pigs in a heavy clay soil. Forensic Science International 101:113–122.
Vass AA, Bass WM, Wolt, JD, Foss, JE and Ammons, JT (1992). Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. Journal of Forensic Sciences 37:1236–1253.
Warner RM (2008). Applied Statistics: From Bivariate Through Multivariate Techniques. Sage, Los Angeles.
Wilson AS, Janaway RC, Holland AD, Dodson HI, Baran E, Pollard AM and Tobin DJ (2007). Modelling the buried body environment in upland climes using three contrasting field sites. Forensic Science International 169:6–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jervis, J.R., Pringle, J.K., Cassella, J.P., Tuckwell, G. (2009). Using Soil and Groundwater Data to Understand Resistivity Surveys over a Simulated Clandestine Grave. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L., Miller, D. (eds) Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9203-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9204-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)