Skip to main content

Closing the Gap between Enterprise Models and Service-oriented Architectures

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering

Abstract

In 2005, four German universities created a research program to improve and standardize their administrative processes. Therefore, reams of processes were analyzed and core functions identified. As a result, automatable core functions have been implemented as web-services using the service-oriented architecture (SOA) paradigm. To facilitate reuse, this functionality has been documented using a service catalog. However, the real advantage of SOA does not evolve until these services become configurable at the business level. We introduce a modeling grammar to model service function interfaces and standardized business object types allowing the redesign of enterprise systems functionalities at the business level. We illustrate the usefulness of our approach with a pilot study conducted at the University of Munster (Germany).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Becker, L. Algermissen, T. Falk, D. Pfeiffer, and P. Fuchs, “Model Based Identification and Measurement of Reorganization Potential in Public Administrations - the PICTURE-Approach,” presented at The Tenth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS’06), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Fremantle, S. Weerawarna, and R. Khalaf, “Enterprise Service - Examining the emerging field of Web Services and how it is integrated into existing enterprise infrastructures,” Communication of the ACM, vol. 45, pp. 77-82, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Erl, Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design: Prentice Hall PTR, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Karow and A. Gehlert, “On the Transition from Computation Independent to Platform Independent Models,” presented at AMCIS Conference Proceedings, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Hammer and J. Champy, Business Reengineering: a manifesto for business revolution, vol. 1. New York: HarperBusiness, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Balzert, Development of Software-Systems: Principles, methods, languages, tools. Mannheim, Vienna, Zurich: Wissenschaftsverlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. K. Ferstl and E. J. Sinz, Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 1, 2 ed. München, Wien: Oldenbourg, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Fettke and P. Loos, “Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application,” Information Systems and e-Business Management, vol. 1, pp. 35-53, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. U. Frank, “Conceptual Modelling as the Core of the Information System Discipline - Perspectives and Epistemological Challenges,” presented at Proceedings of the 5th America’s Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS’99, Milwaukee, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Harel and B. Rumpe, “Modeling languages: Syntax, semantics and all that stuff, part I: The basic stuff.,” Weizmann Institute Of Science 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Agarwal, P. De, and A. P. Sinha, “Comprehending object and process models: An empirical study,” IEEE Trans.Software Engrg., vol. 25, pp. 541-556, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Wand and R. Weber, “Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda,” Information System Research, vol. 13, pp. 363-376, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Desel, “Petri nets and business process management “. Saarbrücken: Geschäftsstelle Schloss Dagstuhl, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.-W. Scheer, ARIS - Business Process Modeling, vol. 3. Berlin: Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. White, “Using BPMN to Model a BPEL Process,” BPTrends, vol. 3, pp. 1-18, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. IBM, “Business Process Execution Language for Web Services,” 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kelly, M. Rossi, and J. P. Tolvanen, “What is Needed in a MetaCASE Environment?,” in Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, U. Frank, Ed., 2005, pp. 22-35.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Cubetto. Dresden: Semture GmbH, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Dietzsch and T. Goetz, “Nutzen-orientiertes Management einer Service-orientierten Unternehmensarchitektur.,” presented at Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005, eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. J. Oey, H. Wagner, S. Rehbach, and A. Bachmann, “Mehr als alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen: Eine einführende Darstellung des Konzepts der serviceorientierten Architektur.,” in Unternehmensarchitekturen und Systemintegration, S. Aier, Ed. Berlin: GITO Verlag, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Muschamp, “An introduction to Web Services ” BT Technology Journal, vol. 22, pp. 9-18, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. E. Walsh, Uddi, Soap, and WSDL: The Web Services Specification Reference Book. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Ardissono, A. Goy, and G. Petrone, “Enabling conversations with web services,” presented at Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS’03, Melbourne, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Weller, M. Juhrisch, and W. Esswein, “Towards using visual process models to control enterprise systems functionalities,” Int. J. Networking and Virtual Organisations, vol. 3, pp. 412-424, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Ouyang, M. Dumas, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, and W. M. P. van der Aalst, “Pattern-based translation of BPMN process models to BPEL web services,” International Journal of Web Service Research (JWSR), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Weske, “Business-Objekte: Konzepte, Architekturen, Standards,” Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 41, pp. 4-11, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Overhage, “A Standardized Framework for the Specification of Software Components,” presented at Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Object-Oriented and Internet-Based Technologies, Concepts, and Applications for a Networked World (NODe 2004), Erfurt, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Greiffenberg, Method Engineering in Business and Government. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. O. M. Group, “Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4,” 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Juhrisch, M., Esswein, W. (2008). Closing the Gap between Enterprise Models and Service-oriented Architectures. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8740-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8741-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics