Skip to main content

Part of the book series: British History in Perspective ((BHP))

Abstract

In the seventh and eighth centuries successful kings gained power by conquest, but their hard-won confederations were rarely stable; what was welded together in one generation dissolved in the next, to be reassembled in other equally short-lived hegemonies. The real problem was not to acquire but to maintain control. Lordship was based upon rewarding faithful service, and kings especially were expected to be generous: both kings and queens ‘must first of all be free with gifts’.2 Bede praises Oswine of Deira because he was not merely ‘tall and handsome, pleasant of speech, courteous in manners’ but also ‘bountiful to nobles and commoners alike’, and the Bernician King Oswald had at his court an official specifically charged to distribute alms to the poor.3

[He] became great under the skies, prospered in honour, until every one of those who lived about him … had to pay him tribute. That was a good king.

(Beowulf)1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. James Campbell, ‘The Sale of Land and the Economics of Power in Early England: Problems and Possibilities’, Haskins Society J., 1 (1989), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. M. Charles-Edwards, ‘Kinship, Status and the Origins of the Hide’, P&P, 56 (1962), 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Senchus is edited, translated and discussed by John Bannermann, in Celtica, 7 (1966), 142–62

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tangl (ed.), Die briefe des heligen Bonifatius und Lullus, no. 14 (Barbara Yorke, “‘Sisters under the Skin”? Anglo-Saxon Nuns and Nunneries in Southern England’, Reading Medieval Studies, 15 (1989), 99).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. 1257 (dated 781); Donald A. Bullough, ‘What has Ingeld to do with Lindis-farne?’, ASE, 22 (1993), 106–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Later evidence suggests that when only a part of the whole was granted, the structure was often preserved by dividing each settlement between grantor and grantee (David Roffe, ‘The Descriptio Terramm of Peterborough Abbey’, Historical Research, 65 (1992), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Margaret Sparks and Tim Tatton-Brown, ‘The History of the Villa of St Martin’s, Canterbury’, Archaeologia Cantiana, 104 (1987), 200–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Susan Kelly, ‘Trading Privileges from Eighth-century England’, Early Medieval Europe, 1 (1992), 3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. David Peacock, ‘Offa’s Black Stones’, Antiquity, 71 (1997), 709–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Ann Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, A. (1999). Strategies of Power. In: Kingship and Government in Pre-Conquest England c.500–1066. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27454-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27454-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-56798-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27454-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics