Skip to main content

Abstract

Judge Judith Sheindlin, supervising judge for the Manhattan Family Court, published in 1996 her perspective on the state of affairs in juvenile justice in a book titled, Don’t Pee on My Leg and Tell Me It’s Raining. Judge Sheindlin’s views, graphically foreshadowed in the title, include a repudiation of the social causation approach to juvenile delinquency and a call for a return to an ethic of self-discipline and individual accountability. From the vantage-point of over 20 years’ experience as a juvenile judge, Sheindlin sees a system that can ‘barely function’, trading in empty threats and broken promises (p. 5). Juvenile courts, in her view, have avoided assigning blame for wrongdoing and have thereby encouraged a lack of individual responsibility, leaving young offenders with ready excuses for their predatory behavior and completely without fear of any consequences. The system must ‘cut through the baloney and tell the truth’, starting with the ‘total elimination of probation’ in favor of a greater reliance on police surveillance and increased incarceration (p. 61).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, D. A. and Gendreau, P. (1990) Tertiary prevention: What the meta-analyses of the offender treatment literature tells us about ‘what works’. Canadian Journal of Criminology 32, 173–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., Kiessling, J., Robinson, D. and Mickus, S. (1986) The risk principle of case classification: An outcome evaluation with young adult probationers. Canadian Journal of Criminology 28, 377–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, T. L. (ed.) (1991) Introduction. Intensive Interventions with High Risk Youths (pp. 1–26). Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (1996) Youth Violence, Guns, and Illicit Drug Markets. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. and Gardner, W. (1996) Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, F. (1996) After 10 years, juvenile crime begins to drop. The New York Times (9 August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. P., Jr. (1996) When community corrections means business: Introducing ‘reinventing’ themes to probation and parole. Federal Probation 60, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Crime in America (1996) The State of Violent Crime in America. Washington, DC: Council on Crime in America.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (1996) Stop crime where it starts. The New York Times (31 July), A15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finckenauer, J. (1982) Scared straight! and the panacea phenomenon. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A. (1996) Trends In Juvenile Violence — A Report to the United States Attorney General on Current and Future Rates of Juvenile Offending. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J. (1996) The Book of David. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P. (1996) The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (ed.), Choosing Correctional Options That Work (pp. 117–30). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. W., Model, K., Rydell, C. P. and Chiesa, J. (1996) Diverting Children From A Life of Crime. Santa Monica, California: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humes, E. (1996) No Matter How Loud I Shout. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. D. (1990) Screwing the System and Making It Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickona, T. (1991) Educating For Character. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1995) What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In J. McGuire (ed.), What Works. Reducing Reoffending: Guidelines from Research Practices (pp. 63–78). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B., Rodriguez, O., Baake, A., Nuenfeldt, D. and Steele, P. (1989) Demonstration of Post-adjudication, Non-residential Intensive Supervision Programs: Assessment Report. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, D. M. and Umbreit, M. S. (1995) Managing change: Toward a balanced and restorative justice model. Perspectives (Spring), 43–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Juvenile Justice (1991) Desktop Guide to Good Juvenile Probation Practice. Pittsburgh: National Juvenile Court Services Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • OJJDP (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency) (1996) Reducing Youth Gun Violence: An Overview of Programs and Initiatives. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. (1992) The Re-Emergence of Correctional Intervention. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1991) Policy relevance and the future of criminology. Criminology 29, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. (1996) Juvenile Boot Camps: Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, L. (1996) Preliminary Evaluation Report: Violence Prevention Groups. Newton, Massachusetts: Romano & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline. New York: DoubleDay Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheindlin, J. (1996) Don’t Pee On My Leg and Tell Me It’s Raining. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., Sickmund, M. and Poe-Yamagata, E. (1996) Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1996 Update on Violence. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbet, P. M. (1996) Juvenile Probation: The Workhorse of the Juvenile Justice System. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebush, R. G. (1993) Juvenile intensive supervision: The impact on felony offenders diverted from institutional placement. Crime & Delinquency 39, 68–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1995a) Crime and public policy. In J. Q. Wilson and J. Petersilia (eds.), Crime. San Francisco: CS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1995b) On Character. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldredge, J. (1988) Differentiating the effects of juvenile court sentences on eliminating recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25, 264–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corbett, R.P. (1999). Juvenile Probation on the Eve of the Next Millennium. In: McDowell, G.L., Smith, J.S. (eds) Juvenile Delinquency in the United States and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27412-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics