Abstract
The actin cortex is an essential element of the cytoskeleton allowing cells to control and modify their shape. It is involved in cell division and migration. However, probing precisely the physical properties of the actin cortex has proved to be challenging: it is a thin and dynamic material, and its location in the cell—directly under the plasma membrane—makes it difficult to study with standard light microscopy and cell mechanics techniques. In this chapter, we present a novel protocol to probe dynamically the thickness of the cortex and its fluctuations using superparamagnetic microbeads in a uniform magnetic field. A bead ingested by the cell and another outside the cell attract each other due to dipolar forces. By tracking their position with nanometer precision, one can measure the thickness of the cortex pinched between two beads and monitor its evolution in time. We first present the set of elements necessary to realize this protocol: a magnetic field generator adapted to a specific imaging setup and the aforementioned superparamagnetic microbeads. Then we detail the different steps of a protocol that can be used on diverse cell types, adherent or not.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chugh P, Paluch EK (2018) The actin cortex at a glance. J Cell Sci 131:jcs186254. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.186254
Fritzsche M, Lewalle A, Duke T et al (2013) Analysis of turnover dynamics of the submembranous actin cortex. Mol Biol Cell 24:757–767. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e12-06-0485
Svitkina TM, Neyfakh AA, Bershadsky AD (1986) Actin cytoskeleton of spread fibroblasts appears to assemble at the cell edges. J Cell Sci 82:235–248. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.82.1.235
Chugh P, Clark AG, Smith MB et al (2017) Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension. Nat Cell Biol 19:689–697. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3525
Charras GT, Hu C-K, Coughlin M et al (2006) Reassembly of contractile actin cortex in cell blebs. J Cell Biol 175:477–490. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200602085
Eghiaian F, Rigato A, Scheuring S (2015) Structural, mechanical, and dynamical variability of the actin cortex in living cells. Biophys J 108:1330–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.016
Clark AG, Dierkes K, Paluch EK (2013) Monitoring actin cortex thickness in live cells. Biophys J 105:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.057
Laplaud V, Levernier N, Pineau J et al (2021) Pinching the cortex of live cells reveals thickness instabilities caused by myosin II motors. Sci Adv 7:eabe3640. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe3640
Pierre P, Turley SJ, Gatti E et al (1997) Developmental regulation of MHC class II transport in mouse dendritic cells. Nature 388:787–792. https://doi.org/10.1038/42039
Halbach K (1985) Application of permanent magnets in accelerators and electron storage rings (invited). J Appl Phys 57:3605–3608. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.335021
Tretiak O, Blümler P, Bougas L (2019) Variable single-axis magnetic-field generator using permanent magnets. AIP Adv 9:115312. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5130896
Fonnum G, Johansson C, Molteberg A et al (2005) Characterisation of Dynabeads® by magnetization measurements and Mössbauer spectroscopy. J Magn Magn Mater 293:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.041
Bauër P, Tavacoli J, Pujol T et al (2017) A new method to measure mechanics and dynamic assembly of branched actin networks. Sci Rep 7:15688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15638-5
Azioune A, Storch M, Bornens M et al (2009) Simple and rapid process for single cell micro-patterning. Lab Chip 9:1640. https://doi.org/10.1039/b821581m
Carpi N, Carpi N, Piel M et al (2011) Micropatterning on glass with deep UV. Protoc Exch. https://doi.org/10.1038/protex.2011.238
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Gosse C, Croquette V (2002) Magnetic tweezers: micromanipulation and force measurement at the molecular level. Biophys J 82:3314–3329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75672-5
Van Der Walt S, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J et al (2014) Scikit-image: image processing in python. PeerJ 2:e453. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453
Clausen MP, Colin-York H, Schneider F et al (2017) Dissecting the actin cortex density and membrane-cortex distance in living cells by super-resolution microscopy. J Phys Appl Phys 50:064002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa52a1
Truong Quang BA, Peters R, Cassani DAD et al (2021) Extent of myosin penetration within the actin cortex regulates cell surface mechanics. Nat Commun 12:6511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26611-2
Bon P, Bourg N, Lécart S et al (2015) Three-dimensional nanometre localization of nanoparticles to enhance super-resolution microscopy. Nat Commun 6:7764. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8764
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Vermeil, J. et al. (2024). A Magnetic Pincher for the Dynamic Measurement of the Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells. In: Wuelfing, C., Murphy, R.F. (eds) Imaging Cell Signaling. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2800. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3834-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3834-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3833-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3834-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols