Skip to main content

Interactome Profiling of DNA Damage Response (DDR) Mediators with Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Base Excision Repair Pathway

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2701))

Abstract

Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) is a versatile tool to probe for global protein–protein interactions (PPIs) in biological samples. Such interactions coordinate complex biological processes, such as the DNA damage response (DDR). Induction of DNA damage activates signaling networks where posttranslational modifications cause PPI that facilitate DNA repair and cell cycle coordination. Protein interactome profiling of DDR sensors, transducers, and effectors has the potential to identify novel DDR mechanisms that could advance our understanding and treatment of diseases associated with DDR defects, such as cancer. The protocol described here is a routine PPI analysis procedure that can be performed on samples stimulated with DNA damage. All processes and reagents are optimized for maximum sensitivity on the interactome and minimal contamination for the mass spectrometer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mesquita RD, Woods NT, Seabra-Junior ES, Monteiro AN (2010) Tandem BRCT domains: DNA’s praetorian guard. Genes Cancer 1:1140–1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947601910392988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerloff DL, Woods NT, Farago AA, Monteiro AN (2012) BRCT domains: a little more than kin, and less than kind. FEBS Lett 586:2711–2716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Li J et al (2002) Structural and functional versatility of the FHA domain in DNA-damage signaling by the tumor suppressor kinase Chk2. Mol Cell 9:1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00527-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Durocher D, Jackson SP (2002) The FHA domain. FEBS Lett 513:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03294-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharp MF, Bythell-Douglas R, Deans AJ, Crismani W (2021) The Fanconi anemia ubiquitin E3 ligase complex as an anti-cancer target. Mol Cell 81:2278–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarsounas M, Sung P (2020) The antitumorigenic roles of BRCA1-BARD1 in DNA repair and replication. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21:284–299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0218-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Woods NT et al (2012) Charting the landscape of tandem BRCT domain-mediated protein interactions. Sci Signal 5:rs6. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2002255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu WF et al (2019) CTDP1 regulates breast cancer survival and DNA repair through BRCT-specific interactions with FANCI. Cell Death Discov 5:105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-019-0185-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lagundzin D et al (2019) Delineating the role of FANCA in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in beta cells through its protein interactome. PLoS One 14:e0220568. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mellacheruvu D et al (2013) The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods 10:730–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi H et al (2012) Analyzing protein-protein interactions from affinity purification-mass spectrometry data with SAINT. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 39:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0815s39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas T. Woods .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Law, H.C.H., Noe, D., Woods, N.T. (2023). Interactome Profiling of DNA Damage Response (DDR) Mediators with Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry. In: Bhakat, K.K., Hazra, T.K. (eds) Base Excision Repair Pathway. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2701. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3373-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3373-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3372-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3373-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics