Abstract
People form mental concepts of categories of objects, which permit them to respond appropriately to new objects they encounter by making inferences from properties of known categories. Among those concepts, food concepts are central to human food perception and acceptation, but how these concepts are represented in memory is unclear and remains a vast field of research to explore. Traditionally, it was though that categories and hence concepts were well defined with clear definitions that specifies what is in and out of the category. However, it has not been possible to find definitions for many familiar categories especially in the food domain where food can be classified in many different ways: food to eat at breakfast, processed food, sweet food, food for kids, protein-containing food, plant food. Thus, it is necessary to use empirical approaches to understand food mental representations. In this chapter, we will focus on how to access consumers’ mental representations. We first discuss the notions of categorization, categories, and concepts that are closely related to mental representations. Then, two methods used in sensory evaluation and consumer science to access mental representations are presented: sorting task and projective mapping. These methods are illustrated with applications taken from the literature.
Key words
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chollet S, Lelièvre M, Abdi H, Valentin D (2011) Sort and beer: everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask. Food Qual Prefer 22(6):507–520
Risvik E, McEwan JA, Colwill JS, Rogers R, Lyon DH (1994) Projective mapping: a tool for sensory analysis and consumer research. Food Qual Prefer 5(4):263–269
Risvik E, McEwan JA, Rødbotten M (1997) Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping data. Food Qual Prefer 8(1):63–71
Reed SK (2011) Cognition. De Boeck, Bruxelles, 476 p
Sternberg RJ (2007) Manuel de ppsychologie cognitive. Du laboratoire à la vie quotidienne. De Boeck, Bruxelles, 662 p
Blanchard SJ, Banerji I (2016) Evidence-based recommendations for designing free-sorting experiments. Behav Res 48(4):1318–1336
Faye P, Brémaud D, Durand Daubin M, Courcoux P, Giboreau A, Nicod H (2004) Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: an alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Qual Prefer 15(7):781–791
Honoré-Chedozeau C, Lelièvre-Desmas M, Ballester J, Chollet S, Valentin D (2017) Knowledge representation among assessors through free hierarchical sorting and a semi-directed interview: exploring Beaujolais wines. Food Qual Prefer 57:17–31
Patris B, Gufoni V, Chollet S, Valentin D (2007) Impact of training on strategies to realize a beer sorting task: behavioral and verbal assessments. In: Ho Chi Minh: University-Ho chi Minh City Publishing House. [cité 22 juin 2021]. Disponible sur: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00149116
Lawless HT (1989) Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chem Senses 14(3):349–360
Chrea C, Valentin D, Sulmont-Rossé C, Nguyen DH, Abdi H (2005) Semantic, typicality and odor representation: a cross-cultural study. Chem Senses 30(1):37–49
Lawless H, Glatter S (1990) Consistency of multidimensional scaling models derived from odor sorting. J Sens Stud 5(4):217–230
MacRae AW, Howgate P, Geelhoed EN (1990) Assessing the similarity of odours by sorting and by triadic comparison. Chem Senses 15:661–699
MacRae AW, Rawcliffe T, Howgate P, Geelhoed EN (1992) Patterns of odour similarity among carbonyls and their mixtures. Chem Senses 17(2):119–125
Cliceri D, Dinnella C, Depezay L, Morizet D, Giboreau A, Appleton KM et al (2017) Exploring salient dimensions in a free sorting task: a cross-country study within the elderly population. Food Qual Prefer 60:19–30
Guerrero L, Claret A, Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Enderli G, Sulmont-Rossé C et al (2012) Cross-cultural conceptualization of the words Traditional and Innovation in a food context by means of sorting task and hedonic evaluation. Food Qual Prefer 25(1):69–78
Lawless HT, Sheng N, Knoops SSCP (1995) Multidimensional scaling of sorting data applied to cheese perception. Food Qual Prefer 6(2):91–98
Campo E, Do BV, Ferreira V, Valentin D (2008) Aroma properties of young Spanish monovarietal white wines: a study using sorting task, list of terms and frequency of citation. Aust J Grape Wine Res 14(2):104–115
Lelièvre M, Chollet S, Abdi H, Valentin D (2009) Beer-trained and untrained assessors rely more on vision than on taste when they categorize beers. Chemosens Percept 2(3):143–153
Soufflet I, Calonnier M, Dacremont C (2004) A comparison between industrial experts’ and novices’ haptic perceptual organization: a tool to identify descriptors of the handle of fabrics. Food Qual Prefer 15(7):689–699
Garbez M, Galopin G, Sigogne M, Favre P, Demotes-Mainard S, Symoneaux R (2015) Assessing the visual aspect of rotating virtual rose bushes by a labeled sorting task. Food Qual Prefer 40:287–295
Gómez-Corona C, Valentin D, Escalona-Buendía HB, Chollet S (2017) The role of gender and product consumption in the mental representation of industrial and craft beers: an exploratory study with Mexican consumers. Food Qual Prefer 60:31–39
Abdi H, Valentin D, Chollet S, Chrea C (2007) Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications. Food Qual Prefer 18(4):627–640
Ballester J, Abdi H, Langlois J, Peyron D, Valentin D (2009) The odor of colors: can wine experts and novices distinguish the odors of white, red, and rosé wines? Chemosens Percept 2(4):203
Parr WV, Valentin D, Green JA, Dacremont C (2010) Evaluation of French and New Zealand Sauvignon wines by experienced French wine assessors. Food Qual Prefer 21(1):56–64
Rao VR, Katz R (1971) Alternative multidimensional scaling methods for large stimulus sets. J Mark Res 8(4):488–494
APM C (1999) Sorting data: collection and analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Clark H (1968) On the use and meaning of propositions. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 7:421–431
Kirkland J, Bimler D, Drawneek A, McKim M, Schölmerich A (2000) A quantum leap in the analyses and interpretation of attachment sort items. In: Patterns of secure base behavior: Q-sort perspectives on attachment and caregiving in infancy and childhood. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Cadoret M, Lê S, Pagès J (2011) Statistical analysis of hierarchical sorting data. J Sens Stud 26(2):96–105
Dun-Rankin P (1983) Scaling methods. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Goldstone R (1994) An efficient method for obtaining similarity data. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 26(4):381–386
Pagès J (2003) Recueil direct de distances sensorielles: application à l’évaluation de dix vins blancs du Val-de-Loire. Sci Aliment 23(5–6):679–688
Pagès J (2005) Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Qual Prefer 16(7):642–649
Torri L, Dinnella C, Recchia A, Naes T, Tuorila H, Monteleone E (2013) Projective Mapping for interpreting wine aroma differences as perceived by naïve and experienced assessors. Food Qual Prefer 29(1):6–15
Mitterer Daltoé ML, Breda LS, Belusso AC, Nogueira BA, Rodrigues DP, Fiszman S et al (2017) Projective mapping with food stickers: a good tool for better understanding perception of fish in children of different ages. Food Qual Prefer 57:87–96
Aschemann-Witzel J, Varela P, Peschel AO (2019) Consumers’ categorization of food ingredients: do consumers perceive them as ‘clean label’ producers expect? An exploration with projective mapping. Food Qual Prefer 71:117–128
Heatherly M, Dein M, Munafo JP, Luckett CR (2019) Crossmodal correspondence between color, shapes, and wine odors. Food Qual Prefer 71:395–405
de Boer J, Aiking H (2019) Strategies towards healthy and sustainable protein consumption: a transition framework at the levels of diets, dishes, and dish ingredients. Food Qual Prefer 73:171–181
Smith AM, McSweeney MB (2019) Partial projective mapping and ultra-flash profile with and without red light: a case study with white wine. J Sens Stud 34(5):e12528
Lê TM, Brard M, Lê S (2017) Holos: a collaborative environment for similarity-based holistic approaches. Behav Res 49(5):1597–1604
Chollet S, Valentin D (2001) Impact of training on beer flavor perception and description: are trained and untrained subjects really different? J Sens Stud 16(6):601–618
Lelièvre M, Chollet S, Abdi H, Valentin D (2008) What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Qual Prefer 19(8):697–703
Ballester J, Patris B, Symoneaux R, Valentin D (2008) Conceptual vs. perceptual wine spaces: does expertise matter? Food Qual Prefer 19(3):267–276
Solomon GEA (1997) Conceptual change and wine expertise. J Learn Sci 6(1):41–60
Blancher G, Clavier B, Egoroff C, Duineveld K, Parcon J (2012) A method to investigate the stability of a sorting map. Food Qual Prefer 23(1):36–43
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chollet, S., Valentin, D. (2023). Perception and Representation: Sorting Task and Projective Mapping. In: Gómez-Corona, C., Rodrigues, H. (eds) Consumer Research Methods in Food Science. Methods and Protocols in Food Science . Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3000-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3000-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2999-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3000-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols