Skip to main content

The Posture-Based Motion Planning Framework: New Findings Related to Object Manipulation, Moving Around Obstacles, Moving in Three Spatial Dimensions, and Haptic Tracking

  • Chapter
Progress in Motor Control

Abstract

We describe the results of recent studies inspired by the posture-based motion planning theory (Rosenbaum et al., 2001). The research concerns analyses of human object manipulation, obstacle avoidance, three-dimensional movement generation, and haptic tracking, the findings of which are discussed in relation to whether they support or fail to support the premises of the theory. Each of the aforementioned topics potentially challenges the theory’s claim that, in motion, goal postures are planned before the selection of movements towards those postures. However, even the quasi-continuous phenomena under study show features that comply with prospective, end-state-based motion planning. We conclude that progress in motor control should not be frustrated by the view that no model is, or will ever be, optimal. Instead, it should find promise in the steady growth of insights afforded by challenges to existing theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, S. L. (1986). Rotations, quaternions, and double groups. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi, E., Hogan, N., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Giszter, S. (1992). Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 603–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. G. & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where objects are grasped reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, C. C. A. M., Vrijenhoek, E. J., & Flash, T. (1997). Principles for the control of kine-matically redundant limbs. In M Fetter, H. Misslisch, & D. Tweed (Eds.), Three-dimensional kinematics of eye-, head-, and limb-movements (pp. 285–297). Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, M. S., Taylor, C. S. R., & Moore, T. (2002). Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex. Neuron, 34, 841–851.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermens, F. & Gielen, S .(2004). Posture-based or trajectory-based movement planning: A comparison of direct and indirect pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 340–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, N. (1984). An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. The Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 2745–2754.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach, J. M. & Atkeson, C. G. (1986). Characterization of joint-interpolated arm movements. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Ed.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 41–54). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jax, S. A., Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2003). Computational motor control and human factors: Modeling movements in real and possible environments. Human Factors, 45, 5–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jax, S. A. & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 425–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawato, M. (1996). Bidirectional theory approach to integration. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVI: Information integration (pp 335 – 367). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S. (1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology, 246, R1000–R1004.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein Breteler, M. D., & Meulenbroek, R.G. J. (2006). Modeling 3D object manipulation: synchronous single-axis joint rotations? Experimental Brain Research, 168, 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, C. L. & Iberall, T. (1994). The grasping hand. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Rosenbaum, D. A., Jansen, C., Vaughan, J., & Vogt, S. (2001). Multijoint grasping movements: Simulated and observed effects of object location, object size, and initial aperture. Experimental Brain Research, 138, 219–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navas, M. F. (1964). Sampling or quantization in the human tracking system. Unpublished masters thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, K. M. & Corcos, D. M. (Eds). (1993). Variability and motor control. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (2005). The Cinderella of psychology: The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychologist, 60, 308–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Meulenbroek, R. G., & Vaughan, J. (2006). Plans for grasping objects. In M. Latash & F. Lestienne (Ed.), Motor Control and Learning Over the Lifespan (pp. 9–25). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. & Dawson, A. M. (2004). The motor system computes well but remembers poorly. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 390–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Dawson, A. M., & Challis, J. H. (2006). Haptic tracking permits bimanual independence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1266–1275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Engelbrecht, S. E., Bushe, M. M., & Loukopoulos, L. D. (1993). Knowledge model for selecting and producing reaching movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 217–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J., & Jorgensen, M. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 321–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709–734.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Slotta, J. D., Vaughan, J., & Plamondon, R. J. (1991). Optimal movement selection. Psychological Science, 2, 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M. M. (1984). Memory for movements. In M. M. Smyth & A. M. Wing (Eds.), The psychology of human movement (pp. 83–117). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, S.P., Jardin, K., Verschueren, S., Meulenbroek, R., Franz, L., Dounskaia, N., Walter, C.B. (1998). Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: effects of muscle grouping and direction. Behavioral Brain Research,90, 79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 907–915.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wel, R. P. Fleckenstein, R., Jax, S., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence for abstract spatio-temporal forms in human motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1117–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, J., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2006). Modeling reaching and manipulating in 2- and 3-D workspaces: The posture-based model. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning and Development, Bloomington, IN, May 31 – June 3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, J., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2001). Planning reaching and grasping movements: The problem of obstacle avoidance. Motor Control, 5, 116–135.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Rosenbaum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenbaum, D.A. et al. (2009). The Posture-Based Motion Planning Framework: New Findings Related to Object Manipulation, Moving Around Obstacles, Moving in Three Spatial Dimensions, and Haptic Tracking. In: Sternad, D. (eds) Progress in Motor Control. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 629. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics