Skip to main content

The Role Of Artefacts In Mathematical Thinking: A Situated Learning Perspective

  • Chapter
New Directions for Situated Cognition in Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education Library ((MELI,volume 45))

Abstract

This chapter aims to explore and discuss the notion of learning as participation with artefacts in social practices. It uses insights and evidence from the empirical field of ardinas’ practice in Cape Verde to support a discussion that combines a situated learning approach with elements of activity theory. Two artefacts are analysed — the calculator and the record table used by the ardinas. We claim that the regulation of participation made possible by these artefacts does not come from the artefacts themselves but from the way they become present in the everyday and the functions they have in the practice. The artefacts do not represent something fixed and external to the practice; their usefulness is not revealed in the characteristics identified outside of its use in the practice. Artefacts are artefacts in the practice, though they have to be read in the interaction with the forms of use that practitioners put into action. Our final discussion goes into two key concepts in situated learning that we connect with the notion of artefact and resource: technology of practice and shared repertoire. The two concepts are complementary: giving visibility to particular aspects: firstly, to the process of construction; secondly, to the history. In both the key idea of participation is present, and it is through participation that one contributes to construction and has access to history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axel, E. (1997). One developmental line in European activity theories. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 128-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhurst, D. (1997). Activity, consciousness, and communication. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 147-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R.G. (1968). Ecological Psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behaviour. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1999). The content and unsolved problems of activity theory. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 39-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1999a). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1999b). Innovative learning in work teams: Analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y., & Cole, M. (1997). Situated cognition in search of an agenda. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition (pp. 301-309). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1996). Novas regras do método sociológico (António Escobar Pires, Trad.) (2nd ed. Vol. 34). Lisboa: Gradiva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M., Chaiklin, S., & Jensen, U. J. (1999). Activity theory and social practice: An introduction. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 12-30). Aarhus, DK: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: An introduction. In D. Holland & J. Lave (Eds.), History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities (pp. 3-33). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, U. J. (1999). Categories in activity theory: Marx’s philosophy just-in-time. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 79-99). Aarhus, DK: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1992). Word problems: A microcosm of theories of learning. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 74-92). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Murtaught, M., & Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67-94). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality(M. J. Hall, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restivo, S. (1993). The social life of mathematics. In S. Restivo, J. P. V. Bendegem & R. Fischer (Eds.), Math worlds: Philosophical and social studies of mathematics and mathematics education (pp. 247-278). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M. P. & Matos, J. F. (1998). School mathematics learning: Participation through appropriation of mathematical artefacts. In A. Watson (Ed.), Situated cognition and the learning of mathematics (pp. 104-125). Oxford: Centre for Mathematics Education Research, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1999). Knowledge as shared procedures. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 53-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

dos Santos, M., Mates, J. (2008). The Role Of Artefacts In Mathematical Thinking: A Situated Learning Perspective. In: Watson, A., Winbourne, P. (eds) New Directions for Situated Cognition in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library, vol 45. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71579-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics