Skip to main content

Skull and Facial Bone Trauma

  • Chapter
Accidental Injury

Abstract

Trauma, “a body injury produced by sudden force,”1 is something that man has had to confront from the beginning of time. Skull and facial trauma have long been a part of war and warring. Early biblical references, such as David and Goliath,2 and accounts of early man illustrate the severe effects caused by a substantial blow to the head. While interpersonal violence still accounts for a significant portion of head trauma, the invention, development, and use of motor vehicles provides a medium through which a majority of skull and facial trauma still occur.3 The leading causes of facial fracture trauma are illustrated in Fig. 12.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 359.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Random House Dictionary. Random House, New York,1978

    Google Scholar 

  2. Old Testament,1 Samuel 17:49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karlson TA. The incidence of hospital treated facial injuries from vehicles. Trauma 1982;22(4).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Backatitis SH, Dalmotas DJ. Injury patterns and injury sources of unrestrained and three-point belt restrained car occupants in injury producing frontal collisions. 29th AAAM, p. 365, October 7–9, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cesari D, Ramet M, Welbourne E. Experimental evaluation of human facial tolerance to injuries. 1989 IRCOBI, Stockholm, Sweden, September 13–15, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Viano DC, Melvin JW, McCleary JD, Madeira RG, Shee TR. Measurement of head dynamics and facial contact forces in the Hybrid III dummy. 30th Stapp, #861891, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) P-189, p. 269, October 27–29, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The abbreviated injury scale. American Associa tion for Automotive Medicine, 1980 revision.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lange WA. Facial injury biomechanics and its 17–19,1988. applications to automotive design. Society of Automotive Engineers P-49, Warrendale, PA, January 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foster JK, Kortge JO, Wolanin MJ. Hybrid III-a biomechanically based crash test dummy. 21st Stapp, #770938, p. 973, October 19–21, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hubbard RP, McLeod DG. Definition and devel opment of a crash dummy head. 18th Stapp, #741193, p. 599, December 4–5, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hodgson VR, Thomas LM. Comparison of head acceleration injury indices in cadaver skull fracture. 15th Stapp, #710854, Coronado, CA, November 17–19, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grosch L, Katz E, Kassing L, Marwitz H, Zeidler F New measurement methods to assess the improved protection potential of airbag systems. In: Restrain technologies: front seat occupant protection. #870333, SP-690, p. 161, February 1987, Planath, Nilsson, and Cesari, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newman JA, Gallup BM. Biofidelity improve-ments to the Hybrid III headform. 28th Stapp, #841659, p. 87, November 6–7, 1984. 20–21, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Warner CY, Niven J. A prototype load-sensing dummy face form test device for facial injury.hazard assessment. 23rd AAAM, p. 67, October 29. Hodgson BR, Patrick LM. Dynamic response of 3–6,1979. the human cadaver head compared to a simple

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moulton JR, Warner CY, Mellander H. Design, development and testing of a load-sensing crash dummy face. In: Advances in belt restraint systems: design, performance and usage. SAE #840397, pp. 271–277, February 27—March 2, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Warner CY, Wille MG, Brown SR, Nilsson S, Mellander H. A load sensing face form for auto motive collision crash dummy instrumentation. In: Passenger comfort, convenience, and safety: facial bones and skull. 16th Stapp, #720965, p.text tools and procedures. #860197, p. 85, Febru 186, November 8–10, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Warner CY, Allsop DL, Wille MG. Surface pressure sensors and ARD application SBIR final #942213, 1994. report. DOT DTRS-57–86-C-00100, April 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nilsson D, Flanath I. Facial injury occurrence ance. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechan-in traffic accidents an its detection by a load ical Engineering, Brigham Young University, sensing face. 11th ESV Conference, p. 613, May December 1989. 12, 1987. 35. Yoganandan N, Fintar F, Sances A, Myklebust J

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nyquist GW, Cavanaugh JM, Goldberg SJ, King AI. Facial impact tolerance and response. 30th Stapp, #861896, SAE P-189, p. 379, October 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Allsop DL, Warner CY, Wille MG, Schneider DC, Nahum AM. Facial impact response-a comparison of the Hybrid III dummy and human cadaver.32nd Stapp,#881719,p.139,October 17–19, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perl TR, Nilsson S, Planath I, Wille MG.Deformable load sensing Hybrid III face. 33rd Stapp, #892427, p. 29, October 4, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Melvin JW, Shee TR. Facial injury assessment techniques. 12th ESV,Vol.1,May 29-June 1,1989. In: Melvin JW,Little WC, eds, A biome-chanical face for the Hvbrid III dummy.SAE #952715.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benson BR, Perl TR, Smith GC, Planath I. Lateral load-sensing Hybrid III head. 35th Stapp, San Diego, CA, November 18–20, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Le Fort R. Etude experimentale sur les fractures de la machorire supericure. Rev Shir 1901;23:208, 360, 479.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider DC. Biomechanics of facial bone injury:exoerimental asoecys, In:The biomechanics of trauma. NoewalkCT,p281,1985.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hodgson VR, Nakamura GS, Talwalker RK.Resonse of the faxial structure to impact.8th staoo,p299,October 21–23, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hodgson BR,Lange WA, Tolerance of the facuak bones. 9th Stapp, p.144.October 20–21,1965.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hodgson VR. Tolerance of the facial bines to impact. Am J Anat 1967; 120: 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hodgson BR, Patrick LM. Dynamic response of the human cadaver head compated to a simple mathematical model.12th Stapp,#680784,p.280,October 22–23, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swearingen JJ, Tolerances of the human face to crash impact. Office of Aviation Medicine, Federal Aviation Agency,June 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nahum AM, Gatts JD, Gadd CW, Danforth JE Impact tolerance of the skull and face. 2th Stapp, #680785, p. 302, October 22–23, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schneider DC, Nahum AM. Impact studies of facial bones and skull. 16thStapp,#720965,p186,Nobember 8–10, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Allsop DL. Human facial fracture and compli-ance. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechan-ical Engineering, Brigham Young University,December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yoganandan N, Fintar F, Sances A, Myklebust J,Schmaltz D. Steering wheel induced facialtrauma. 32nd Stapp, #881712, p. 45, October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yoganandan B, Sances A, Pintar F,Harris G, Larspm S. Three-dimensional computerized tomography analysis of steering wheel. Department of Neurosurgery,Medical College of Wisconsin, Paper presented at 12th ESV, #89–4A-W-020, Gothenberg, Sweden, MAY 29,1989.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Welbourne ER, Ramet M, Zarebski M. A comparison of human facial fracture tolerance with the performance of a surrogate test device. 12th ESV, #89–4A-0–004, Gothenberg, Sweden, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yoganandan N, Sances AJ, Pintar F, Reinartz J, Haffner M. Facial fracture probability secondary to steering wheel impact. Thirteenth International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles. #S8-O-07.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Reinartz J, Sances AJ. Human facial tolerance to steering wheel impact: a biomechanical study. J Safety Res 1993;24(2).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Porta D, Kress J, et al. Experimentally-induced frontal bone/facial fractures in human cadavers with a characterization of impact response. Fourteenth International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, #94-S1-O-25.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nahum AM, Ward CC, Raasch FO, Adams S, Schneider DC. Experimental studies of side impact to the human head. 24th Stapp, #801301, Troy, MI, October 15–17, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nahum AM, Ward CC, Schneider DC, Raasch FO, Adams S. A study of impacts to the lateral protected and unprotected head. 25th Stapp, #811006, San Francisco, CA, September 28–30, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stalnaker RL, Roberts VL, McElhaney JH. Side impact tolerance to blunt trauma. 17th Stapp, #730979, Oklahoma City, OK, November 12–13, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Got C, Patel A, Fayon A, Tarriere CH, Walfisch G. Results of experimental head impacts on cadavers: the various data obtained and their relations to some measured physical parameters. 22nd Stapp, #780887, October 24–26, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Melvin JW, Fuller PM, Daniel RP, Pavliscak GM. Human head and knee tolerance to localized impacts. SAE #690477, May 19–23, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ono K, Kikuchi A, Kobayashi H, Nakamura N. Human head tolerances to sagittal and lateral impacts—estimation deduced from experimental dead injury using subhuman primates and human cadaver skulls. In: Head injury prevention past and present research. Wayne State University, Department of Neurosurgery, Detroit, MI, December 4, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yoganandan N, Sances A, et al. Biomechanical tolerance of the cranium. SAE #941727.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hodgson VR, Thomas LM. Breaking strength of the human skull vs. impact surface curvature. Wayne State University School of Medicine Department of Neurosurgery, Final report, contract No. FJ-11–7609, June 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hodgson VR, Thomas LM. Breaking strength of the human skull vs. Impact surface curvature. Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, NHTSA DOT-H-S-801–002, PB 233 041, November 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Allsop DL, Perl TR, Warner CY. Force/deflection and fracture characteristics of the temporoparietal region of the human head. 35th Stapp, San Diego, CA, November 18–20, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  50. McIntosh AS, Kallieris D, Mattem R, Mitner E. Head and neck injury resulting from low velocity direct impact. SAE #933112,1993.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Culver R, Bender M, Melvin JW. Mechanisms, tolerances and responses obtained under dynamic superior-inferior head impact. Highway Safety Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, UM-HSRI-78–21, PB 229292, May 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allsop, D., Kennett, K. (2002). Skull and Facial Bone Trauma. In: Nahum, A.M., Melvin, J.W. (eds) Accidental Injury. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21787-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21787-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3168-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21787-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics