Abstract
Soundness of inference systems for inductive proofs is sometimes shown ad hoc and a posteriori, lacking modularization and interface notions. As a consequence, these soundness proofs tend to be clumsy, difficult to understand and maintain, and error prone with difficult to localize errors. Furthermore, common properties of the inference rules are often hidden, and the comparison with similar systems is difficult. To overcome these problems we propose to develop soundness proofs systematically by presenting an abstract frame inference system a priori and then to design each concrete inference rule locally as a sub-rule of some frame inference rule and to show its soundness by a small local proof establishing this sub-rule relationship. We present a frame inference system and two approaches to show its soundness, discuss an alternative, and briefly classify the literature. In an appendix we give an example and briefly discuss failure recognition and refutational completeness.
supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 314 (D4-Projekt)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Leo Bachmair (1988). Proof by Consistency in Equational Theories. 3rd IEEE symposium on Logic In Computer Science, pp. 228–233.
Klaus Becker (1993). Proving Ground Confluence and Inductive Validity in Constructor Based Equational Specifications. TAPSOFT 1993, LNCS 668, pp. 46–60, Springer.
Klaus Becker (1994). Rewrite Operationalization of Clausal Specifications with Predefined Structures. PhD thesis, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern.
Wolfgang Bibel, E. Eder (1993). Methods and Calculi for Deduction. In: Dov M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger, J. A. Robinson (eds.). Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. Vol. 1, pp. 67–182, Clarendon.
Robert S. Boyer, J Strother Moore (1979). A Computational Logic. Academic Press.
Ulrich Fraus (1993). A Calculus for Conditional Inductive Theorem Proving. 3rd CTRS 1992, LNCS 656, pp. 357–362, Springer.
Bernhard Gramlich (1989). Inductive Theorem Proving Using Refined Unfailing Completion Techniques. SEKI-Report SR-89-14 (SFB), Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern. Short version in: 9th ECAI 1990, pp. 314–319, Pitman.
Martin Protzen (1994). Lazy Generation of Induction Hypotheses. 12th CADE 1994, LNAI814, pp. 42–56, Springer.
Uday S. Reddy (1990). Term Rewriting Induction. 10th CADE 1990, LNAI 449, pp. 162–177, Springer.
Christoph Walther (1994). Mathematical Induction. In: Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, eds. cf. above. Vol. 2, pp. 127–228, Clarendon.
Claus-Peter Wirth (1991). Inductive Theorem Proving in Theories specified by Positive/Negative Conditional Equations. Diplomarbeit, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern.
Claus-Peter Wirth, Bernhard Gramlich (1993). A Constructor-Based Approach for Positive/Negative-Conditional Equational Specifications. 3rd CTRS 1992, LNCS 656, pp. 198–212, Springer. Revised and extended version in J. Symbolic Computation (1994) 17, pp. 51–90, Academic Press.
Claus-Peter Wirth, Bernhard Gramlich (1994). On Notions of Inductive Validity for First-Order Equational Clauses. 12th CADE 1994, LNAI 814, pp. 162–176, Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wirth, CP., Becker, K. (1995). Abstract notions and inference systems for proofs by mathematical induction. In: Dershowitz, N., Lindenstrauss, N. (eds) Conditional and Typed Rewriting Systems. CTRS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 968. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60381-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60381-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60381-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45513-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive