Skip to main content

A rule-based similarity measure

  • Selected Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 837))

Abstract

An induction-based method for retrieving similar cases and/or easily adaptable cases is presented in a 3-steps process: first, a rule set is learned from a data set; second, a reformulation of the problem domain is derived from this ruleset; third, a surface similarity with respect to the reformulated problem appears to be a structural similarity with respect to the initial representation of the domain. This method achieves some integration between machine learning and case-based reasoning: it uses both compiled knowledge (through the similarity measure and the ruleset it is derived from) and instanciated knowledge (through the cases).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Aamodt, Explanation-Driven Retrieval, Reuse and Retain of Cases, in [7].

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.K. Bamberger, K. Goos, Integration of CBR and Inductive Learning Methods, in [7].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bareiss R., Exemplar-based knowledge acquisition. Boston, MA, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bareiss R. et al., Panel discussion on indexing vocabulary, DARPA CBR Workshop 1989, Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Bergadano, A Giordana, L. Saitta, Automated Concept Acquisition in Noisy Environments, IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-10, pp 555–578, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Bisson, KBG A Knowledge Based Generalizer. ML-90, B. Porter & R. Mooney Eds, Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Proceedings of 1st EWCBR, M. Richter, S. Wess, K.-D. Althoff, F. Maurer Eds, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, nov 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Fisher, Cobweb: Knowledge acquisition via Conceptual clustering, Machine Learning Vol2, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gams, New Measurements Highlight the Importance of Redundant Knowledge. Proc. of EWSL 1989, K. Morik Ed., Pitman, London, pp 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.G. Ganascia, AGAPE et CHARADE, deux techniques d'apprentissage symbolique appliquées à la construction de bases de connaissances, Thèse d'Etat, 1987, Orsay.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Gentner, Structure Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science, 1983, Vol 7 N 2, pp 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.J. Holyoak, L. Koh, Analogical Problem Solving: Effects of Surface and Structural Similarity in Analogical Transfer, Midwestern Psychological Association Ed, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Indurkhya, On the Role of Interpretive Analogy in Learning. Algorithmic Learning Theory, S. Arikawa et al. Eds, Springer Verlag 1990, pp 174–189.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.P. Jantke, S. Lange, Case-Based Representation and Learning of Pattern Languages, in [7].

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.T. Keane, Analogical Problem Solving, Chichester, Ellis Horwood 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. D. Kelly, L. Davis, A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Classification, Proc. IJCAI 1991, J. Mylopoulos, R. Reiter Eds, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp 645–650.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Kibler, D. Aha, Learning representative exemplars of concepts: An initial case study, Proc. of the 4th IWML, reprinted in Readings in Machine Learning, J.W. Shavlik T. G. Dietterich, Morgan Kaufman 1990, pp 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.L. Kolodner, Extending problem solver capabilities through case-based inference, Proceedings 4th Workshop on ML, UC Irvine 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Manago, K-D Althoff, E. Auriol, R. Traphoner, S. Wess, N. Conruyt, F. Maurer, Induction and Reasoning from Cases, in [7].

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.S. Michalski, A theory and methodology for inductive learning, Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, I, R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonnell, T.M. Mitchell Eds, Springer Verlag, (1993), p 83–134.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Nakatani, D. Israel, Tuning Rules by Cases, in [7].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nicolas J, Lebbe J, Vignes R, From Knowledge to Similarity, Numeric-Symbolic Learning and Data Analysis, Diday Ed, Nova Sciences, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Quinlan, R.M. Cameron-Jones, FOIL; A Midterm Report, ECML 93, P.B. Bradzil Ed, Springer-Verlag, 1993, pp 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. J. Russell, The Use of Knowledge in Analogy and Induction, Pitman, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Sebag M. Schoenauer, Incremental Learning of Rules and Meta-Rules. ML-90, B. Porter & R. Mooney Eds, Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Sebag, A Constraint-based Induction Algorithm in FOL, ML-94, W. Cohen & H. Hirsh Eds, Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stefan Wess Klaus-Dieter Althoff Michael M. Richter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sebag, M., Schoenauer, M. (1994). A rule-based similarity measure. In: Wess, S., Althoff, KD., Richter, M.M. (eds) Topics in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 837. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58330-0_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58330-0_81

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58330-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48655-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics