Skip to main content

A Hierarchical Model for Clustering and Categorising Documents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2291))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose a new hierarchical generative model for textual data, where words may be generated by topic specific distributions at any level in the hierarchy. This model is naturally well-suited to clustering documents in preset or automatically generated hierarchies, as well as categorising new documents in an existing hierarchy. Training algorithms are derived for both cases, and illustrated on real data by clustering news stories and categorising newsgroup messages. Finally, the generative model may be used to derive a Fisher kernel expressing similarity between documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Douglas Baker, Thomas Hofmann, Andrew McCallum, and Yiming Yang. A hierarchical probabilistic model for novelty detection in text. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/ mccallum/papers/tdt-nips99s.ps.gz.

  2. Gilles Celeux and Gérard Govaert. A Classification EM algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 14:315–332, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, and R. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):391–407, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1):1–38, 1977.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Gaussier and N. Cancedda. Probabilistic models for terminology extraction and knowleddge structuring from documents. In Proceedings of the 2001IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Grefenstette. Explorations in Automatic Thesaurus Construction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. S. Harris. Distributional structure. Word, 10:146–162, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 289–296. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999. http://www2.sis.pitt.edu/ dsl/UAI/uai99.html.

  9. Thomas Hofmann. Learning the similarity of documents: An information-geometric approach to document retrieval and categorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, page 914. MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas Hofmann and Jan Puzicha. Statistical models for co-occurence data. A.I. Memo 1625, A.I. Laboratory, February 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tommi S. Jaakkola and David Haussler. Exploiting generative models in discriminative classifiers. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 11, pages 487–493, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thorsten Joachims. Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML98), number 1398 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 137–142. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christopher D. Manning and Hinrich Schütze. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Andrew McCallum, Ronald Rosenfeld, Tom Mitchell, and Andrew Y. Ng. Improving text classification by shrinkage in a hierarchy of classes. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 359–367, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fernando Pereira, Naftali Tishby, and Lillian Lee. Distributional clustering of english words. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Rose, E. Gurewitz, and G. Fox. Statistical mechanics and phase transitions in clustering. Physical Review Letters, 65(8):945–848, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Salton. Automatic Thesaurus Construction for Information Retrieval. North Holland Publishing, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. M. Titterington, A. F. Smith, and U. E. Makov. Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distribution. John Wiley & Sons, San Diego, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kristina Toutanova, Francine Chen, Kris Popat, and Thomas Hofmann. Text classification in a hierarchical mixture model for small training sets. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naonori Ueda and Ryohei Nakano. Deterministic annealing variant of the EM algorithm. In Gerry Tesauro, David Touretzky, and Todd Leen, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, pages 545–552. MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. J. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworth, 2nd edition edition, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alexei Vinokourov and Mark Girolami. A probabilistic framework for the hierarchic organisation and classification of document collections. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 18(2–3):153–172, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peter Willett. Recent trends in hierarchical document clustering: A critical review. Information Processing & Management, 24(5):577–597, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yiming Yang and Xin Liu. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 42–49, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gaussier, E., Goutte, C., Popat, K., Chen, F. (2002). A Hierarchical Model for Clustering and Categorising Documents. In: Crestani, F., Girolami, M., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45886-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45886-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43343-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45886-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics